This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/14/world/asia/inching-near-a-iran-nuclear-deal-negotiators-go-silent.html
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Inching Near an Iran Nuclear Deal, Negotiators Go Silent | |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| VIENNA — Iranian and American negotiators made significant progress on Monday toward a historic nuclear agreement and have narrowed the list of final issues, several diplomats involved in the talks said. | VIENNA — Iranian and American negotiators made significant progress on Monday toward a historic nuclear agreement and have narrowed the list of final issues, several diplomats involved in the talks said. |
| While the negotiators have moved closer to announcing an accord — an announcement could come as early as Tuesday — they said the agreement remained fragile and warned that last-minute hitches could emerge as they review pages of text that define limits on Tehran’s nuclear capacity and the lifting of Western and United Nations sanctions. | While the negotiators have moved closer to announcing an accord — an announcement could come as early as Tuesday — they said the agreement remained fragile and warned that last-minute hitches could emerge as they review pages of text that define limits on Tehran’s nuclear capacity and the lifting of Western and United Nations sanctions. |
| The agreement runs more than 80 pages, including annexes, and covers the pace of research and development on advanced uranium enrichment, the size of nuclear stockpiles over the next 15 years and the pace at which oil, financial and other sanctions will be lifted. If announced in coming days, Congress would have 60 days to review the agreement, and opponents of the deal in Congress and in Israel made clear on Monday that they planned to make the most of that time. | The agreement runs more than 80 pages, including annexes, and covers the pace of research and development on advanced uranium enrichment, the size of nuclear stockpiles over the next 15 years and the pace at which oil, financial and other sanctions will be lifted. If announced in coming days, Congress would have 60 days to review the agreement, and opponents of the deal in Congress and in Israel made clear on Monday that they planned to make the most of that time. |
| Most of the key negotiators went virtually silent on Monday. After predicting day after day that a nuclear accord was imminent, Iran’s foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, told reporters on Monday evening that there would be no agreement on Monday night, and this time he made no predictions. | Most of the key negotiators went virtually silent on Monday. After predicting day after day that a nuclear accord was imminent, Iran’s foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, told reporters on Monday evening that there would be no agreement on Monday night, and this time he made no predictions. |
| Mr. Zarif’s terse declaration — that he was “sleepy and overworked,” a description that appeared to describe most of the negotiating teams — seemed to reflect continuing debates over an array of matters. Among them was the question of how long a United Nations Security Council ban on the sale or purchase of conventional arms and ballistic missiles would remain in place. | Mr. Zarif’s terse declaration — that he was “sleepy and overworked,” a description that appeared to describe most of the negotiating teams — seemed to reflect continuing debates over an array of matters. Among them was the question of how long a United Nations Security Council ban on the sale or purchase of conventional arms and ballistic missiles would remain in place. |
| The nuclear issues at the heart of the agreement — nuclear research and development, the amount of low-enriched uranium, the number of centrifuges Iran can keep, among others — appear to have been settled. | The nuclear issues at the heart of the agreement — nuclear research and development, the amount of low-enriched uranium, the number of centrifuges Iran can keep, among others — appear to have been settled. |
| The arms embargo remains an issue of enormous political sensitivity on all sides. Iran considers the bans, contained in several Security Council resolutions, to be an affront, while the United States and Europe do not want to see Iran using billions of dollars in newly-unfrozen cash and weapons to project power around the Middle East. | The arms embargo remains an issue of enormous political sensitivity on all sides. Iran considers the bans, contained in several Security Council resolutions, to be an affront, while the United States and Europe do not want to see Iran using billions of dollars in newly-unfrozen cash and weapons to project power around the Middle East. |
| Iranian officials apparently believed the issues would be resolved by now, and that they would move directly to celebrating an accord that allowed them to keep almost all of their nuclear infrastructure, even if much of it is disassembled and its operations limited for more than a decade. | Iranian officials apparently believed the issues would be resolved by now, and that they would move directly to celebrating an accord that allowed them to keep almost all of their nuclear infrastructure, even if much of it is disassembled and its operations limited for more than a decade. |
| In an apparent sign of their eagerness, the office of Iran’s president, Hassan Rouhani, erroneously issued Twitter messages too soon, declaring: “#IranDeal, is the victory of diplomacy and mutual respect over the outdated paradigm of exclusion and coercion.” The posted message was soon deleted, subsequently reappearing in slightly edited form, beginning, “If #IranDeal, ….” | In an apparent sign of their eagerness, the office of Iran’s president, Hassan Rouhani, erroneously issued Twitter messages too soon, declaring: “#IranDeal, is the victory of diplomacy and mutual respect over the outdated paradigm of exclusion and coercion.” The posted message was soon deleted, subsequently reappearing in slightly edited form, beginning, “If #IranDeal, ….” |
| As the talks have entered their critical final phase, Secretary of State John Kerry has become quieter. When reporters were ushered into a first meeting he held today, Mr. Kerry maintained a stony silence about how the talks were going. He did not even repeat his talking points from Sunday about how he was “hopeful” but that “work remains to be done.” | As the talks have entered their critical final phase, Secretary of State John Kerry has become quieter. When reporters were ushered into a first meeting he held today, Mr. Kerry maintained a stony silence about how the talks were going. He did not even repeat his talking points from Sunday about how he was “hopeful” but that “work remains to be done.” |
| Indeed, no American officials would brief reporters, apparently concluding that anything they said now might be seized on by the opposition in Washington or Tehran. | Indeed, no American officials would brief reporters, apparently concluding that anything they said now might be seized on by the opposition in Washington or Tehran. |
| As the negotiators here have steadily, if slowly, narrowed the gaps, the American ally who has been the most outspoken critic of the impending accord, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, denounced it with a fervor that has not been heard in months from top Israeli officials — including what appeared to be a direct swipe at President Obama and Mr. Kerry. | As the negotiators here have steadily, if slowly, narrowed the gaps, the American ally who has been the most outspoken critic of the impending accord, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, denounced it with a fervor that has not been heard in months from top Israeli officials — including what appeared to be a direct swipe at President Obama and Mr. Kerry. |
| “Even over the weekend, as Iran continued to receive more and more concessions at the negotiating table, Iranian President Rouhani led a march of hatred in the streets of Tehran in which the masses cried, ‘Death to America! Death to Israel!’” he said. “If the concessions continued even after these unequivocal calls for the destruction of those conducting the negotiations, it seems that there are those who are ready to make an agreement at any price — and this bad agreement is unavoidable.” | “Even over the weekend, as Iran continued to receive more and more concessions at the negotiating table, Iranian President Rouhani led a march of hatred in the streets of Tehran in which the masses cried, ‘Death to America! Death to Israel!’” he said. “If the concessions continued even after these unequivocal calls for the destruction of those conducting the negotiations, it seems that there are those who are ready to make an agreement at any price — and this bad agreement is unavoidable.” |
| The comments were notable because in recent weeks, with a deal imminent, Mr. Netanyahu has kept a comparatively low profile. There was a sense in Israel that he had overplayed his hand when he denounced the negotiations before a joint session of Congress. But on Monday he suggested that Israel’s sabotage campaign against Iran’s nuclear program would continue. | The comments were notable because in recent weeks, with a deal imminent, Mr. Netanyahu has kept a comparatively low profile. There was a sense in Israel that he had overplayed his hand when he denounced the negotiations before a joint session of Congress. But on Monday he suggested that Israel’s sabotage campaign against Iran’s nuclear program would continue. |
| “We never committed ourselves to preventing an agreement, certainly not one that the major powers are ready to sign at any price,” he said. “We did commit ourselves to prevent Iran from arming itself with nuclear weapons, and indeed, were it not for our efforts over the years, Iran would already be able to develop atomic bombs.” | “We never committed ourselves to preventing an agreement, certainly not one that the major powers are ready to sign at any price,” he said. “We did commit ourselves to prevent Iran from arming itself with nuclear weapons, and indeed, were it not for our efforts over the years, Iran would already be able to develop atomic bombs.” |
| Mr. Obama and Mr. Kerry have clearly been taking their time, sensitive to the critique that they wanted a deal too badly. Whether Mr. Kerry is willing to walk away over the arms embargo, though, is hard to tell. Administration officials acknowledge that the embargo is often violated, and that giving up on the talks would mean forgoing more than a decade of nuclear limits because of an inability to negotiate restrictions on non-nuclear arms. | Mr. Obama and Mr. Kerry have clearly been taking their time, sensitive to the critique that they wanted a deal too badly. Whether Mr. Kerry is willing to walk away over the arms embargo, though, is hard to tell. Administration officials acknowledge that the embargo is often violated, and that giving up on the talks would mean forgoing more than a decade of nuclear limits because of an inability to negotiate restrictions on non-nuclear arms. |
| One senior administration official said that while there was confidence Iran would agree to some period of time to limit its arms trade, “they don’t want it for very long, and we want it for as long as humanly possible.” | One senior administration official said that while there was confidence Iran would agree to some period of time to limit its arms trade, “they don’t want it for very long, and we want it for as long as humanly possible.” |