This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jul/21/iraq-inquiry-john-chilcot-repeatedly-refused-help-speed-up

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Sir John Chilcot has 'repeatedly refused' extra help to speed up Iraq inquiry Sir John Chilcot has 'repeatedly refused' extra help to speed up Iraq inquiry
(34 minutes later)
The chairman of the inquiry into the Iraq war has repeatedly refused offers of extra assistance to help speed up the completion of his long-awaited report, the head of the civil service has revealed. The chairman of the inquiry into the Iraq war has repeatedly refused offers of extra help to speed up the completion of his long-awaited report, the head of the civil service has revealed.
Sir John Chilcot told the prime minister last month that he still could not say when the inquiry would report, prompting David Cameron to say he was “fast losing patience” over the lack of progress.Sir John Chilcot told the prime minister last month that he still could not say when the inquiry would report, prompting David Cameron to say he was “fast losing patience” over the lack of progress.
The cabinet secretary, Sir Jeremy Heywood, said there was nothing he could do to accelerate the process, but insisted that he had offered Chilcott extra resources.The cabinet secretary, Sir Jeremy Heywood, said there was nothing he could do to accelerate the process, but insisted that he had offered Chilcott extra resources.
Heywood said: “I’m not washing my hands of it. It is an independent inquiry, the timetable is not in my hands. “I’m not washing my hands of it,” Heywood toldthe public administration and constitutional affairs select committee on Tuesday. “It is an independent inquiry, the timetable is not in my hands.
“I have repeatedly offered to Sir John extra resources on behalf of the prime minister, extra legal resources and so on. “I have repeatedly offered to Sir John extra resources on behalf of the prime minister; extra legal resources and so on. At the prime minister’s request I saw him again recently, we had a private meeting at which I repeated that request, obviously.”
“At the prime minister’s request I saw him again recently, we had a private meeting at which I repeated that request, obviously. He said that when extra resources had been offered, the inquiry team said they weren’t needed and they were working as fast as they could.
“I just know that John Chilcot will complete this report as soon as he possibly can. He is as aware as everybody else is about the importance of getting this done and quickly.”“I just know that John Chilcot will complete this report as soon as he possibly can. He is as aware as everybody else is about the importance of getting this done and quickly.”
He added: “We have repeatedly offered the inquiry further resources, they say they don’t need them, they are doing it as fast as they can.” The inquiry into the Iraq war started in July 2009 but the final report has been held up by the process of Maxwellisation, where draft criticisms are put to individuals and they are given the chance to respond.
The inquiry into the Iraq war started in July 2009 but the final report has been held up for the process of Maxwellisation, where draft criticisms are put to individuals and they are given the chance to respond. Under questioning from the Labour MP Paul Flynn, Heywood said: “Everybody shares your frustration, from the prime minister downwards – including Sir John Chilcot – about how long this has taken.
Under questioning from Labour MP Paul Flynn at the public administration and constitutional affairs select committee, Heywood said: “Everybody shares your frustration, from the prime minister downwards – including Sir John Chilcot – about how long this has taken.” “I don’t think anybody is deliberately trying to slow down the inquiry,” he said, adding that there would eventually be a “long, hard look” into the time it had taken.
He said: “I don’t think anybody is deliberately trying to slow down the inquiry,” but added that there would be a “long, hard look” once it had completed its work to find out why it took so long. “But not in a way that interrupts the last phase of the inquiry. The inquiry needs to just get its head down and complete its work.”
“But not in a way that interrupts the last phase of the inquiry. The inquiry needs to just get its head down and complete its work,” he said.