This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jul/23/theresa-may-police-water-cannon-use-england-wales
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Theresa May rejects use of water cannon in England and Wales | |
(34 minutes later) | |
The home secretary has signalled that she will never approve the use of water cannon on the streets of England and Wales, fearing it may damage police legitimacy and the principle of policing by consent. Explaining her rejection of an application for their use that was backed by the London mayor, Boris Johnson, Theresa May said police in the UK should never routinely carry guns or use military-style equipment. | |
Johnson had already bought three second-hand water cannon units from Germany, hoping that May would authorise their use. But it emerged last week that the units were riddled with faults, and May said on Thursday that she would not permit them to be used, even if the 67 faults were rectified. | |
Related: Theresa May rejects Boris Johnson’s request to use water cannon | Related: Theresa May rejects Boris Johnson’s request to use water cannon |
During a speech in Brixton, south London, in which she promised to subject policing to a raft of further radical reform, May said: “Our police have never and will never routinely carry guns or hide behind military-style equipment.” On her veto of water cannon, she said: “I was also acutely conscious of the potential impact of water cannon on perceptions of police legitimacy and the very principle of policing by consent.” | |
Turning down the application earlier this month, May told MPs that her decision followed exhaustive medical and scientific tests which led her to conclude that the German cannon had the potential to cause serious injuries including spinal fractures, that there were doubts over their usefulness in fast-moving riots, and that they were likely to damage the British tradition of policing by consent. | |
Previous version
1
Next version