This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-33684937
The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Woman rejected by mother in will wins £164k inheritance | Woman rejected by mother in will wins £164k inheritance |
| (34 minutes later) | |
| A woman who was cut out of her mother's will has been awarded a £164,000 inheritance in what experts believe could prove to be a landmark ruling. | A woman who was cut out of her mother's will has been awarded a £164,000 inheritance in what experts believe could prove to be a landmark ruling. |
| Heather Ilott went through a lengthy court battle after her mother Melita Jackson left her £486,000 estate to animal charities when she died in 2004. | Heather Ilott went through a lengthy court battle after her mother Melita Jackson left her £486,000 estate to animal charities when she died in 2004. |
| The Court of Appeal has ruled she should receive a third of the estate. | The Court of Appeal has ruled she should receive a third of the estate. |
| The ruling could significantly weaken people's right to leave money to those they want to inherit it, it is thought. | |
| BBC legal affairs correspondent Clive Coleman said experts said the ruling would mean people could still disinherit their children but would have to explain why and what connection they had to those they did leave money or assets to. | BBC legal affairs correspondent Clive Coleman said experts said the ruling would mean people could still disinherit their children but would have to explain why and what connection they had to those they did leave money or assets to. |
| The court heard Mrs Ilott, 54, had eloped at the age of 17 with her boyfriend and, as a result, her mother had never forgiven her and did not want her to receive a penny of her estate. It was left to the RSPCA, RSPB and Blue Cross charities. | The court heard Mrs Ilott, 54, had eloped at the age of 17 with her boyfriend and, as a result, her mother had never forgiven her and did not want her to receive a penny of her estate. It was left to the RSPCA, RSPB and Blue Cross charities. |
| Mrs Ilott married her partner, and the couple live in Ware in Hertfordshire. They have five children and the court heard Mrs Ilott planned to use the inheritance to buy their housing association home. | Mrs Ilott married her partner, and the couple live in Ware in Hertfordshire. They have five children and the court heard Mrs Ilott planned to use the inheritance to buy their housing association home. |
| Analysis by Clive Coleman, legal affairs correspondent | Analysis by Clive Coleman, legal affairs correspondent |
| When Melita Jackson died in 2004 she made it crystal clear she didn't want her estranged daughter Heather Ilott to benefit, and so left her estate to animal charities with which she had little connection. | When Melita Jackson died in 2004 she made it crystal clear she didn't want her estranged daughter Heather Ilott to benefit, and so left her estate to animal charities with which she had little connection. |
| The relationship between mother and daughter soured when, aged 17, Heather eloped with her future husband. | The relationship between mother and daughter soured when, aged 17, Heather eloped with her future husband. |
| Yesterday she was awarded a third of the estate because her mother hadn't left "reasonable provision" for her in the will. | Yesterday she was awarded a third of the estate because her mother hadn't left "reasonable provision" for her in the will. |
| She'll now be able to buy her housing association property and won't lose her state benefits. | She'll now be able to buy her housing association property and won't lose her state benefits. |
| Experts say the ruling means you can still disinherit your children but you'll have to explain why and what connects you to those you do leave money to. | Experts say the ruling means you can still disinherit your children but you'll have to explain why and what connects you to those you do leave money to. |
| That'll make it easier for adult "disinherited" children to challenge wills and claim greater sums by way of reasonable provision. | That'll make it easier for adult "disinherited" children to challenge wills and claim greater sums by way of reasonable provision. |
| Mrs Jackson made her last will in 2002 with a letter to explain why she had disinherited her only daughter, referring to the fact she had walked out of her home in 1978 to live with her boyfriend. | Mrs Jackson made her last will in 2002 with a letter to explain why she had disinherited her only daughter, referring to the fact she had walked out of her home in 1978 to live with her boyfriend. |
| Mrs Ilott, who was an only child, having been born two months after her father died in an accident, had in 2007 won the right to an inheritance of £50,000 after a district judge concluded she had been "unreasonably" excluded by Mrs Jackson. That ruling was reversed, before Appeal Court judges ruled she was entitled to a share of the money. | Mrs Ilott, who was an only child, having been born two months after her father died in an accident, had in 2007 won the right to an inheritance of £50,000 after a district judge concluded she had been "unreasonably" excluded by Mrs Jackson. That ruling was reversed, before Appeal Court judges ruled she was entitled to a share of the money. |
| When Mrs Ilott appealed to get the amount increased, Mrs Justice Parker dismissed this at the High Court in London, ruling in March 2014 that the previous decision that £50,000 was appropriate could not "be said to be wrong". | When Mrs Ilott appealed to get the amount increased, Mrs Justice Parker dismissed this at the High Court in London, ruling in March 2014 that the previous decision that £50,000 was appropriate could not "be said to be wrong". |
| However, in the latest hearing Lady Justice Arden said Mrs Ilott's mother had been "unreasonable, capricious and harsh" and ruled she should receive a greater proportion of the estate. | However, in the latest hearing Lady Justice Arden said Mrs Ilott's mother had been "unreasonable, capricious and harsh" and ruled she should receive a greater proportion of the estate. |