This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/01/no-one-in-london-is-safe-from-reach-of-kremlin-says-friend-of-litvinenko

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
No one in London is safe from reach of Kremlin, says friend of Litvinenko No one in London is safe from reach of Kremlin, says friend of Litvinenko
(about 5 hours later)
London has become one of the most dangerous cities in the world for critics of Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, with “no one safe” from the reach of the Kremlin, according to one of Alexander Litvinenko’s closest confidantes. London has become one of the most dangerous cities in the world for critics of Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, with “no one safe” from the reach of the Kremlin, according to one of Alexander Litvinenko’s closest confidants.
Yuri Felshtinsky, a historian who co-authored the book Blowing Up Russia with the former secret agent, said the UK’s capital had gone from being a safe haven for Russian expatriates to being increasingly dangerous for opponents of Putin. Yuri Felshtinsky, a historian who co-wrote the book Blowing Up Russia with the former secret agent, said the capital had gone from being a safe haven for Russian expatriates to being dangerous for opponents of Putin.
Speaking hours after the closing statements of the inquiry into the killing of Litvinenko on Friday, Felshtinsky said that a string of unsolved murders indicated that a culture of impunity existed in London for the murderers of Russian dissidents.Speaking hours after the closing statements of the inquiry into the killing of Litvinenko on Friday, Felshtinsky said that a string of unsolved murders indicated that a culture of impunity existed in London for the murderers of Russian dissidents.
“The message is that no one is safe in London unfortunately. I do not know if everybody is safe in the rest of the world but the message at this point is that no one is safe in London,” he told the Observer. “The message is that no one is safe in London. I do not know if everybody is safe in the rest of the world, but the message at this point is that no one is safe in London,” he told the Observer. Felshtinsky’s book with Litvinenko accused the FSB, the contemporary name for the KGB, of blowing up Moscow apartment blocks to justify a war against Chechnya in which some 300 people died.
Felshtinsky’s co-authored book with Litvinenko accused the FSB, the contemporary name for the KGB, of blowing up Moscow apartment blocks to justify a war against Chechnya in which some 300 people died. On Wednesday it emerged that MI6 had judged the book one of two “red lines” Litvinenko crossed that caused him to be murdered by the Russian state. The other was allegations published by Litvinenko online in July 2006, four months before he was murdered, in which he claimed that Putin was a paedophile. The book itself was recently added to Russia’s list of “extremist materials”, which means that online access to the title for anyone in Russia is restricted, with those in possession of a digital copy facing being penalised.
On Wednesday it emerged that MI6 had judged the book one of two “red lines” that Litvinenko crossed that caused him to be murdered by the Russian state. The other was allegations published by Litvinenko online in July 2006, four months before he was murdered, in which he alleged Putin was a paedophile. On Friday the closing statements of the six-month inquiry into the poisoning of Litvinenko alleged that Putin “personally ordered” the killing of the 43-year-old dissident. Ben Emmerson QC, for Litvinenko’s family, said that Russian state responsibility had been proven “beyond reasonable doubt”.
The book itself was recently added to Russia’s list of “extremist materials”, which means that online access to the title for anyone in Russia is restricted while those in possession of a digital copy face being penalised. Litvinenko drank tea containing a fatal dose of radioactive polonium during a meeting on 16 October 2006 at the Millennium Hotel in central London with chief suspects Dmitry Kovtun and Andrei Lugovoi. Detectives found 40 sites contaminated with polonium-210.
On Friday the closing statements of the six-month inquiry into the poisoning of Litvinenko heard that Putin “personally ordered” the killing of the 43-year-old dissident. Ben Emmerson QC, for Litvinenko’s family, said that Russian state responsibility had been proven “beyond reasonable doubt”. Felshtinsky, who lives in the United States, said: “London traditionally was the safest place for Russian émigrés and this all started with individuals like Alexander Herzen, a famous Russian writer, a political dissident living in London from 1852 to 1864 – yet no one was trying to poison or kill him. Unfortunately in recent years London has become a very dangerous place for Russians.”
Litvinenko, drank tea containing a fatal dose of radioactive polonium during a meeting on 16 October 2006 at the Millennium Hotel in central London with chief suspects Dmitry Kovtun and Andrei Lugovoi. Detectives investigating the case ultimately found 40 sites contaminated with polonium-210.
Felshtinsky, who lives in the US, said: “London traditionally was the safest place for Russian emigres and this all started with individuals like Alexander Herzen, a famous Russian writer, a political dissident living in London [1852- 1864] and yet no one was trying to poison or kill him. Unfortunately, in recent years London has become a very dangerous place for Russians.”
Related: Litvinenko inquiry: Russia involved in spy's death, Scotland Yard saysRelated: Litvinenko inquiry: Russia involved in spy's death, Scotland Yard says
Among a series of high-profile mysterious deaths include Alexander Perepilichny, 44, who was helping to investigate corrupt tax officials in Moscow when he died suddenly outside his Surrey mansion and was later found to have a poison in his body favoured by Russian assassins. A series of high-profile mysterious deaths includes that of Alexander Perepilichny, 44, who was helping to investigate corrupt tax officials in Moscow when he died suddenly outside his Surrey mansion and was later found to have a poison in his body favoured by Russian assassins. “We know he was poisoned but not by whom, but there are reasons to believe it was done by the Russian governmentand there are still questions over Berezovsky.”
“We know he was poisoned but not by whom, but there are reasons to believe it was done by the Russian government and there are still questions over Berezovsky.” Exiled oligarch Boris Berezovsky died in uncertain circumstances in Surrey in
Exiled oligarch Boris Berezovsky died in uncertain circumstances in Surrey in March 2013 after falling foul of Putin and amid claims he was about to hand the Russian president evidence of a coup plot. 2013 after falling foul of Putin and amid claims he was about to hand the Russian president evidence of a coup plot.
Questions also remain over the death of Berezovsky’s business partner, Badri Patarkatsishvili, who died in February 2008 while earlier this week “Putin’s banker” Sergei Pugachev revealed how he had fled London to France because someone was trying to murder him. Questions also remain over the death of Berezovsky’s business partner, Badri Patarkatsishvili, who died in February 2008 while last week “Putin’s banker” Sergei Pugachev revealed how he had fled from London to France because someone was trying to murder him.
Felshtinsky added: “London is very popular among Russian emigres but the fact that somehow you are able to organise a killing of a person in London and for this to go unpunished is a bad indicator, it creates a culture of impunity. Felshtinsky said: “London is very popular among Russian émigrés, but the fact that somehow you are able to organise a killing of a person in London and for this to go unpunished is a bad indicator, it creates a culture of impunity.”
“The inquiry named Kovtun and Lugovoi as people who are responsible for killing Litvinenko but they are not going to be punished.” Felshtinsky said he was not considered a traitor by the Russian state, unlike Litvinenko, and that was why he was not killed. “There is a different scale of crime in the eyes of the Kremlin committed by me or Litvinenko. We can write a book together, but he is a former officer who committed treason while I am just a writer. This is the difference. This is why he is dead and I am alive.”
Felshtinsky said he was not considered a traitor by the Russian state, unlike Litvinenko, and that was why he was not killed.
“There is a different scale of crime in the eyes of the Kremlin committed by me or Litvinenko. We can write a book together but he is a former officer who committed treason while I am just a writer. This is the difference, this is why he is dead and I am alive.”