This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/aug/07/lord-janner-fails-to-appear-in-court-for-hearing-on-child-abuse-charges

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Lord Janner ordered to attend court on child abuse charges despite dementia Lord Janner ordered to attend court on child abuse charges despite dementia
(about 1 hour later)
The former Labour peer Lord Janner must attend a preliminary hearing on his child abuse charges despite his severe dementia, a magistrate has ruled. The former Labour peer Lord Janner must attend a preliminary hearing on child abuse charges despite his severe dementia, a magistrate has ruled.
Chief magistrate Howard Riddle said Janner was fit to appear, even if he could become confused. Chief magistrate Howard Riddle said Janner was fit to appear even if he could become confused.
Janner, 87, faces a trial of fact over 22 child sex offences allegedly committed in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s. As Greville Janner, he was an MP for Leicester for 27 years. Janner, 87, faces a trial of the facts over 22 child sex offences allegedly committed in the 1960s, 70s and 80s. As Greville Janner, he was an MP for Leicester for 27 years. He denies any wrongdoing and his family says he is innocent.
His lawyer, Andrew Smith QC, told the first court hearing in the case at Westminster magistrates court on Friday: “Lord Janner is not in attendance. The reason for that submission on his part is that he is unfit to face the court.” He did not attend Friday’s initial hearing after his legal team claimed he was too ill to do so. He has been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, a severe form of dementia.
Giving evidence for Janner, Dr James Warner, who has 20 years experience working with dementia, told the court: “There is no doubt in my mind that Lord Janner has dementia and that it is severe.” Two expert witnesses had argued Janner may find the court distressing, which could lead to a “catastrophic reaction”. But Riddle ruled that the law required Janner’s presence. “It seems to me that for the brief duration of these proceedings Lord Janner is fit to attend,” he said.
He added that Janner’s condition was “beginning to really impact on his day to day life”, and that he was “highly likely to become distressed” in court. The case comes after a review overturned a Crown Prosecution Service decision not to bring charges because of his dementia. Janner is likely to be sent to the crown court, which will decide whether he is fit to plead and face a trial.
He said the severity of dementia “would impair to a very significant extent his ability to communicate verbally” and that “he would not be able to understand that he was in court”. Andrew Smith QC, defending, argued that he should not be forced to appear before the court.
Warner added that Janner was also showing the early signs of Parkinson’s. Dr James Warner, a consultant psychiatrist and dementia expert, told the court he had interviewed Janner earlier this year and believed he was unfit to attend court. “He would not be able to understand that he was here or the purpose of being here. As a consequence, he is highly likely to become distressed,” he said.
The judge said: “This would appear on the face of it to be a section 51 hearing, he wouldn’t have to enter pleas, he wouldn’t have to say anything. I imagine he would be here for less than two minutes. It matters not whether he understands the proceedings.” Clare Montgomery QC, prosecuting, said the court should be able to make the necessary adjustments to minimise any distress.
He added: “There is only one issue: is he fit enough to come through that door for less than one minute?” In April, the director of public prosecutions, Alison Saunders, decided it was not in the public interest for Janner to face a criminal trial on alleged abuse involving nine children because of his severe dementia.
In April, the director of public prosecutions, Alison Saunders, decided not to charge Janner. However, six of the alleged victims asked an independent QC to examineher ruling under the CPS’s victims’ right to review scheme.
However, the decision was reviewed after six of the complainants made a request under a scheme that gives victims the right to challenge Crown Prosecution Service decisions. If a crown court judge decides Janner is fit to plead, a full trial may take place. If not, there will be a trial of the facts, where a jury will decide only if he committed the physical acts of abuse. At a trial of the facts, there is no examination of the mental elements of the crime, no finding of guilt and no conviction. It is a relatively rare procedure normally used in cases where a defendant poses a danger and needs to be in hospital for their own safety and that of others.
The hearing was continuing on Friday. The court cannot impose a hospitalisation or supervision order unless a jury has found the defendant performed the physical act of the crime.
Janner can only be sent to face the fitness-to-plead process and trial of the facts in the crown court if he attends the magistrates court, or his lawyers have been given instructions to consent on his behalf.
If they do not, the prosecution may have to make a little-used application to a high court judge for a voluntary bill of indictment. This has the effect of bypassing the magistrates court and delivering the defendant directly to the crowncourt.
Riddle said he understood Janner may well become intolerant of the legal process – and could even attempt to leave the court – but noted that one expert witness had pointed out that there was unlikely to be any long-term psychological damage as a result of a court appearance.
“He must appear for a comparatively short period of time. He is free to go if he becomes distressed … This will probably be achieved in less than a minute. Nevertheless the law requires his presence,” he concluded.
The court heard Janner’s condition has recently deteriorated and that he tried to leave his home without his carer’s knowledge.
Riddle said there was no doubt that Janner is suffering from dementia but that the court should be able to minimise the length of time he is expected to appear.
The hearing has been adjourned until next Friday.