This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/aug/07/democrats-jubilant-chaotic-republican-debate

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Democrats jubilant after chaotic Republican debate Democrats jubilant after chaotic Republican debate
(about 1 hour later)
Democrats seized on Thursday night’s raucous first Republican debate as a helpful turning point in the wider presidential race, claiming a series of attacks on women’s rights and immigration would alienate many moderate voters.Democrats seized on Thursday night’s raucous first Republican debate as a helpful turning point in the wider presidential race, claiming a series of attacks on women’s rights and immigration would alienate many moderate voters.
Related: Republican debate: Trump was garbled, incoherent – but dominantRelated: Republican debate: Trump was garbled, incoherent – but dominant
As the conservative establishment reeled from a night of high drama that boosted the profile of several candidates but focused attention particularly on Donald Trump, their liberal opponents were in jubilant mood. As the conservative establishment reeled from a night of high drama that boosted the profile of several candidates and attracted record ratings but also focused attention particularly on Donald Trump, their liberal opponents were in jubilant mood.
“I felt pretty good that we increased the chances that the Democratic nominee whoever it is, will ultimately be elected president of the United States,” Debbie Wasserman Schultz, chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), told MSNBC on Friday.“I felt pretty good that we increased the chances that the Democratic nominee whoever it is, will ultimately be elected president of the United States,” Debbie Wasserman Schultz, chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), told MSNBC on Friday.
“When you expose America to the extremism that is the Republican party today like they did last night, it’s very evident that there will be a dramatic and clear contrast going into the general election and Democrats are going to show off that we care about fighting for the middle class and they care about taking care of the wealthiest 1%.”“When you expose America to the extremism that is the Republican party today like they did last night, it’s very evident that there will be a dramatic and clear contrast going into the general election and Democrats are going to show off that we care about fighting for the middle class and they care about taking care of the wealthiest 1%.”
Hillary Clinton, the Democratic frontrunner who was the target of several jibes during the debate, was quick to exploit the attention on more extreme Republican candidates as a fundraising opportunity.Hillary Clinton, the Democratic frontrunner who was the target of several jibes during the debate, was quick to exploit the attention on more extreme Republican candidates as a fundraising opportunity.
“Watch the #GOPdebate?,” her campaign wrote to supporters. “Bet you feel like donating to a Democrat right about now.”“Watch the #GOPdebate?,” her campaign wrote to supporters. “Bet you feel like donating to a Democrat right about now.”
“It’s over,” said Clinton’s closest rival, Bernie Sanders, in a tweet that focused on issues that were not covered by the debate. “Not one word about economic inequality, climate change, Citizens United or student debt. That’s why the Republicans are so out of touch.”“It’s over,” said Clinton’s closest rival, Bernie Sanders, in a tweet that focused on issues that were not covered by the debate. “Not one word about economic inequality, climate change, Citizens United or student debt. That’s why the Republicans are so out of touch.”
Much of the Democratic response focused on the exchanges between Trump and Megyn Kelly. The Fox moderator questioned comments in which he had referred to women variously as “fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals”, only to be brushed off by the billionaire property developer as “politically correct”.Much of the Democratic response focused on the exchanges between Trump and Megyn Kelly. The Fox moderator questioned comments in which he had referred to women variously as “fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals”, only to be brushed off by the billionaire property developer as “politically correct”.
Even Senator Marco Rubio, a more moderate candidate seen as one of the big winners of the night, drew attention to his party’s renewed debates on Planned Parenthood and abortion, appearing to go further than before in arguing against an exception for women who are victims of rape and incest.Even Senator Marco Rubio, a more moderate candidate seen as one of the big winners of the night, drew attention to his party’s renewed debates on Planned Parenthood and abortion, appearing to go further than before in arguing against an exception for women who are victims of rape and incest.
The Florida senator doubled down on his comments during an interview with CNN on Friday, insisting that he would always “err on the side of life” even if a woman conceived through rape or incest.“I personally and honestly and deeply believe that all human life is worthy of protection irrespective of the circumstances in which that human life was created,” Rubio said. “I personally believe that you do not correct one tragedy with a second tragedy – that’s how I personally feel, very strongly about.”The Florida senator doubled down on his comments during an interview with CNN on Friday, insisting that he would always “err on the side of life” even if a woman conceived through rape or incest.“I personally and honestly and deeply believe that all human life is worthy of protection irrespective of the circumstances in which that human life was created,” Rubio said. “I personally believe that you do not correct one tragedy with a second tragedy – that’s how I personally feel, very strongly about.”
The hard line on abortion, echoed by Wisconsin governor Scott Walker, is seen as a requirement for many candidates to proceed in the Republican primary but a potential liability for whoever emerges to fight the Democratic nominee in November 2016.The hard line on abortion, echoed by Wisconsin governor Scott Walker, is seen as a requirement for many candidates to proceed in the Republican primary but a potential liability for whoever emerges to fight the Democratic nominee in November 2016.
“From applauding misogynistic comments, to boasting about defunding women’s healthcare, to opposing a woman’s right to choose – no exceptions – and completely neglecting a discussion around equal pay and the minimum wage, it’s clear no matter who wins, this GOP field is a disaster for women,” said Kaylie Hanson, the DNC director of women’s media.“From applauding misogynistic comments, to boasting about defunding women’s healthcare, to opposing a woman’s right to choose – no exceptions – and completely neglecting a discussion around equal pay and the minimum wage, it’s clear no matter who wins, this GOP field is a disaster for women,” said Kaylie Hanson, the DNC director of women’s media.
The potential for protracted infighting among leading Republican candidates is also seen as an opportunity for Democrats, especially if Trump follows through on threats to stand as an independent if he fails to win the GOP nomination.The potential for protracted infighting among leading Republican candidates is also seen as an opportunity for Democrats, especially if Trump follows through on threats to stand as an independent if he fails to win the GOP nomination.
Related: Trump responds to Megyn Kelly's questions on misogyny – with more misogynyRelated: Trump responds to Megyn Kelly's questions on misogyny – with more misogyny
Reince Priebus, chair of the Republican National Committee, played down the impact of Trump, insisting his heated exchanges were “jabbing here and there … it was just fun”.Reince Priebus, chair of the Republican National Committee, played down the impact of Trump, insisting his heated exchanges were “jabbing here and there … it was just fun”.
But Trump later criticised the tone of the some of the Fox questioning, as “not nice”, and several other candidates questioned whether the tone of recent Republican sparring was off-putting to voters.But Trump later criticised the tone of the some of the Fox questioning, as “not nice”, and several other candidates questioned whether the tone of recent Republican sparring was off-putting to voters.
“We’re going to win when we unite people with an optimistic message,” said a somewhat subdued Jeb Bush, the establishment favourite who was seen as a natural frontrunner until Trump’s dramatic surge in the polls.“We’re going to win when we unite people with an optimistic message,” said a somewhat subdued Jeb Bush, the establishment favourite who was seen as a natural frontrunner until Trump’s dramatic surge in the polls.
Nonetheless, some Democratic responses also highlighted the negative contrast of a lively and spirited Republican debate against what many see as a more processional Democratic primary with fewer opportunities for candidates to spar in public.Nonetheless, some Democratic responses also highlighted the negative contrast of a lively and spirited Republican debate against what many see as a more processional Democratic primary with fewer opportunities for candidates to spar in public.
Martin O’Malley’s deputy campaign manager, Lis Smith, said in a statement: “Tonight’s Republican debate made one thing clear: we need more debates – on both sides.”Martin O’Malley’s deputy campaign manager, Lis Smith, said in a statement: “Tonight’s Republican debate made one thing clear: we need more debates – on both sides.”