This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/aug/12/what-do-you-think-about-the-state-of-australias-same-sex-marriage-debate

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
What do you think about the state of Australia's same-sex marriage debate? What do you think about the state of Australia's same-sex marriage debate?
(35 minutes later)
In a marathon partyroom debate on Tuesday night, the Coalition decided against granting its members of parliament a free vote on marriage equality before the general election. In a marathon party-room debate on Tuesday night, the Coalition decided against granting its members of parliament a free vote on marriage equality before the general election.
The possibility of a plebiscite has been floated; so has the idea that Australia shouldn’t have marriage equality because celebrity fashion designers Dolce and Gabbana don’t want to be married.The possibility of a plebiscite has been floated; so has the idea that Australia shouldn’t have marriage equality because celebrity fashion designers Dolce and Gabbana don’t want to be married.
Tony Abbott said after the meeting: “We will keep faith with the electorate. We will maintain our existing position for the life of this parliament. But our disposition going into the next election, should we win the next election, will be to put to it the people in the next term of parliament.”Tony Abbott said after the meeting: “We will keep faith with the electorate. We will maintain our existing position for the life of this parliament. But our disposition going into the next election, should we win the next election, will be to put to it the people in the next term of parliament.”
As Guardian Australia’s deputy political editor, Katharine Murphy, wrote in her five-point summary of the vote late last night:As Guardian Australia’s deputy political editor, Katharine Murphy, wrote in her five-point summary of the vote late last night:
Many people were upset by last night’s decision: Australians hoping to marry not least among them. Some on social media suggested that Coalition frontbenchers cross the floor; others wondered whether, even given a free vote, the necessary legislation would pass.Many people were upset by last night’s decision: Australians hoping to marry not least among them. Some on social media suggested that Coalition frontbenchers cross the floor; others wondered whether, even given a free vote, the necessary legislation would pass.
One caller this morning to Jon Faine’s ABC Melbourne talkback show summarised just how urgent the issue is for many people:One caller this morning to Jon Faine’s ABC Melbourne talkback show summarised just how urgent the issue is for many people:
Caller on @774melbourne in tears saying he doesn't know he'll live long enough to be allowed to marry his long term partner. Heartbreaking.Caller on @774melbourne in tears saying he doesn't know he'll live long enough to be allowed to marry his long term partner. Heartbreaking.
Was last night’s vote merely a temporary setback? How do you feel about the standard of debate? What can be done now? Or does Tony Abbott have a case? Jump in the thread and let us know.Was last night’s vote merely a temporary setback? How do you feel about the standard of debate? What can be done now? Or does Tony Abbott have a case? Jump in the thread and let us know.