This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2016/mar/03/george-pell-testifies-to-the-child-sexual-abuse-royal-commission-from-rome-day-four-live

The article has changed 17 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
George Pell testifies to the child sexual abuse royal commission from Rome, day four – live George Pell testifies to the child sexual abuse royal commission from Rome, day four – live
(35 minutes later)
9.46pm GMT
21:46
"The boy wasn’t asking me to do anything about it" - Pell
Pell says when a schoolboy complained to him about pedophile priest Father Dowlan, “He just mentioned it casually in conversation, he never asked me to do anything”.
Lawyer: “You didn’t go straight to the school and say: ‘I’ve got this allegation, what’s going on?’”
Pell: “No, I didn’t. People had a different attitude then. There was no specifics about the activity, how serious it was and the boy wasn’t asking me to do anything about it but just lamenting and mentioning it.”
Justice McClellan interjects here. He says: “You and I have had this discussion on more than one occasion. Why was it necessary for people to ask you to do something rather than for you to accept the information and initiate your own response?”
Pell: “Obviously that is not the case and my responsibilities as an auxiliary bishop and director of an educational institution, an archbishop, I was more aware of those obligations in those situations than I was as a young cleric.. But I don’t... excuse my comparative lack of activity, the fact that I only went to the school chaplain and inquired what was the truth of these rumours.”
Tension in room rises as Pell says he did nothing about a 1973 complaint from a boy who told him Father Dowlan was misbehaving with boys.
Q: You could have done something... [to stop Dowlan's abuse] couldn't you?Cd. Pell: "I think that's a vast overstatement." #CARoyalComm
Updated
at 9.48pm GMT
9.38pm GMT
21:38
BWF’s lawyer tells Pell that BWF’s ex-wife also remembers her ex-husband telling her he went to Pell and told him about Dowlan’s abusing.
The lawyer points out BWF and his ex do not have a good relationship and she had no reason to help him, yet supported his evidence that he told Pell of the abuse.
BWF “might have had a fantasy” that the conversation with him happened, Pell suggests.
Cardinal Pell says Ballarat witness BWF might have had a fantasy. Denies he rejected a boy trying to inform him of a sexual assault.
9.30pm GMT
21:30
A lawyer representing a witness, identified only as BWF, tells Pell BWF’s “younger brother was beaten so seriously and so alarmingly and the injuries so apparent that his mother complained to the headmaster, Brother Nangle, about his treatment. Do you understand that to be the evidence?”
Pell: “I do. I do, very sad.”
Lawyer: “The evidence also from BWF is that at 14 years of age he came to learn of the bashing and such was the knowledge of Brother Dowlan’s abuse of children and sexual abuse and molestation of children within the school population, the student population in particular, that he came to understand correctly, as it turned out, that his younger brother had been beaten and sexually abused, do you understand that to be his evidence?”
Pell: “I do.”
Lawyer: “Now he’s said to this royal commission ... ‘I was very upset about what happened so that same week during some free time, I went to the presbytery to seek out Father Pell, who was a well-known influential priest in the area. I was so nervous I just blurted out to Pell that Dowlan had beaten and molested BWG [his brother], and demanded to know what he, Pell, was going to do about it. Pell became angry, yelled at me, ‘Young man, how dare you knock at this door and make demands.’ We argued for a bit and told me to go away and shut the door on me.’”
After some questioning Pell says: “Even if language that I was alleged to have used is ridiculous. The suggestion that I would speak like that to a young person in distress is absolutely false.”
“It might have happened with some other individual, but it certainly didn’t happen with me.”
In 2015, Edward Dowlan was convicted of 16 counts of indecent assault against 11 boys at four Christian Brothers schools and was sentenced to six years and six months in prison, with a four-year non-parole period.
Cd. Pell denies the brother of a beaten, molested boy came to him at presbytery to complain. "It didn't happen with me." #CARoyalComm
Updated
at 9.42pm GMT
9.20pm GMT
21:20
Dr Fitzgerald, the lawyer for abuse survivor Paul Levey, is now asking Pell questions. Like survivor David Ridsdale, Levey is present in the room with Pell in Rome.
Levey was sexually abused by Father Gerald Ridsdale in Melbourne and Mortlake multiple times, and despite this abuse, was forced to live with Ridsdale when he was just 14 years old, subjecting him to further horrific and ongoing abuse.
Levey made the trip to Rome despite suffering severe medical ailments that meant he required a 24-hour stopover for medications on his way.
Pell tells Fitzgerald he was asked to appear in court with Gerald Ridsdale to perhaps lessen his jail time.
“I had some status as an auxiliary bishop and I was asked to appear with the ambition that this would lessen the term or punishment, perhaps, lessen his time in jail.”
Cardinal Pell says he agreed to walk alongside pedophile Gerald Ridsdale to court so he could get a lesser jail term.
Updated
at 9.26pm GMT
9.10pm GMT9.10pm GMT
21:1021:10
Lawyer: “Now, it’s been publicly suggested in Australia that you are the target of a witch-hunt. You could not possibly share that view, could you?”Lawyer: “Now, it’s been publicly suggested in Australia that you are the target of a witch-hunt. You could not possibly share that view, could you?”
Pell: “I have never expressed such a view butI must confess the idea has occurred to me.” Pell: “I have never expressed such a view but I must confess the idea has occurred to me.”
Lawyer: “Do you feel victimised by the process, Cardinal?”Lawyer: “Do you feel victimised by the process, Cardinal?”
Pell: “By the process itself, no, but I am very keen to clearly demonstrate that when false claims are made against me thatI explain the grounds why they are false as I’ve done in this case.” Pell: “By the process itself, no, but I am very keen to clearly demonstrate that when false claims are made against me that I explain the grounds why they are false as I’ve done in this case.”
Updated
at 9.17pm GMT
9.08pm GMT9.08pm GMT
21:0821:08
The number of pedophiles in Ballarat was a "disastrous coincidence," Pell says The number of paedophiles in Ballarat was a 'disastrous coincidence', Pell says
A lawyer representing a child sex abuse victim identified only as BWE, as well as other survivors, asks Pell the reasons behind so many child sexual abusers aggregating in Ballarat East diocese in the 1970s.A lawyer representing a child sex abuse victim identified only as BWE, as well as other survivors, asks Pell the reasons behind so many child sexual abusers aggregating in Ballarat East diocese in the 1970s.
Pell: “I think it was a... disastrous coincidence.” Pell: “I think it was a ... disastrous coincidence.”
Lawyer: “At the time, there were approximately 4 or 5 persons with very similar predilections, specifically a sexual attraction to boys of a similar age in the same suburb. You believe that’s a coincidence?” Lawyer: “At the time, there were approximately four or five persons with very similar predilections, specifically a sexual attraction to boys of a similar age in the same suburb. You believe that’s a coincidence?”
Pell: “Yes, I do.”Pell: “Yes, I do.”
Lawyer: “So you have turned your mind to this issue and your conclusion is that it’s an unfortunate coincidence?”Lawyer: “So you have turned your mind to this issue and your conclusion is that it’s an unfortunate coincidence?”
Pell: “Yes, well I couldn’t imagine the placements that were done there were made there by the leadership of the Christian brothers and I think their leadership in this area was pretty disastrous but I wouldn’t for a minute think that they put all these people together for some specific purpose.” Pell: “Yes, well, I couldn’t imagine the placements that were done there were made there by the leadership of the Christian Brothers and I think their leadership in this area was pretty disastrous but I wouldn’t for a minute think that they put all these people together for some specific purpose.”
Updated
at 9.17pm GMT
9.02pm GMT9.02pm GMT
21:0221:02
The lawyer representing abuse survivor, David Ridsdale, Stephen Odgers, concludes his cross-examination of Pell by saying David once told Pell: “F you, George, and everything you stand for.” The lawyer representing abuse survivor David Ridsdale, Stephen Odgers, concludes his cross-examination of Pell by saying David once told Pell: “F you, George, and everything you stand for.”
Odgers: “I suggest that it was you, not him, who raised the possibility of financial assistance, that you asked him, ‘What would it take for you to keep quiet?’ And that he responded angrily to your suggestions saying, ‘F you, George, and everything you stand for.’ What do you say to that, Cardinal?”Odgers: “I suggest that it was you, not him, who raised the possibility of financial assistance, that you asked him, ‘What would it take for you to keep quiet?’ And that he responded angrily to your suggestions saying, ‘F you, George, and everything you stand for.’ What do you say to that, Cardinal?”
Pell: “That certainly did not happen because I would certainly remember it. I don’t think in fact it’s ever happened to my face in 50 years of priesthood and secondly, I would have been absolutely shocked in that coming – being said to me by a person who phoned me as a friend. That part of the conversation I’m afraid to say that that’s just not true.”Pell: “That certainly did not happen because I would certainly remember it. I don’t think in fact it’s ever happened to my face in 50 years of priesthood and secondly, I would have been absolutely shocked in that coming – being said to me by a person who phoned me as a friend. That part of the conversation I’m afraid to say that that’s just not true.”
Cd. Pell says Mr Ridsdale never rebuffed his alleged bribe by saying "f*ck you George" because "I would certainly remember it." #CARoyalCommCd. Pell says Mr Ridsdale never rebuffed his alleged bribe by saying "f*ck you George" because "I would certainly remember it." #CARoyalComm
UpdatedUpdated
at 9.08pm GMT at 9.18pm GMT
8.57pm GMT8.57pm GMT
20:5720:57
Gerald Ridsdale did 'good things', Pell saysGerald Ridsdale did 'good things', Pell says
Pell is being pressed by abuse survivor David Ridsdale’s lawyer about why he walked to court with the notorious paedophile priest Gerald Ridsdale when he faced charges.Pell is being pressed by abuse survivor David Ridsdale’s lawyer about why he walked to court with the notorious paedophile priest Gerald Ridsdale when he faced charges.
Lawyer: “You walked to court with Gerald Ridsdale in May of 1993, didn’t you?Lawyer: “You walked to court with Gerald Ridsdale in May of 1993, didn’t you?
Pell: “I did.”Pell: “I did.”
Lawyer: “You knew Gerald Ridsdale was pleading guilty to a number of child abuse offences?”Lawyer: “You knew Gerald Ridsdale was pleading guilty to a number of child abuse offences?”
Pell: “I certainly did.”Pell: “I certainly did.”
Lawyer: “Yet, quite literally you stood beside him in public.”Lawyer: “Yet, quite literally you stood beside him in public.”
Pell: “I had been asked either to appear – well certainly I was asked to appear in the court and/or give a reference. There were prolonged discussions with the lawyer. I made it quite clear that I was not going to dispute any of the allegations, that I was not going to imply any disrespect for the victims, the survivors, and I certainly was proposing to say that although I was unaware of much of what he’d done, that already it had done great damage to the church.Pell: “I had been asked either to appear – well certainly I was asked to appear in the court and/or give a reference. There were prolonged discussions with the lawyer. I made it quite clear that I was not going to dispute any of the allegations, that I was not going to imply any disrespect for the victims, the survivors, and I certainly was proposing to say that although I was unaware of much of what he’d done, that already it had done great damage to the church.
“The only thing I would say was that as a priest he’d done other good things like burying the dead and celebrating the sacraments, etc. His lawyer was not willing to have me stand up in court and say that. He said, ‘No, we won’t call you. Would you walk to the court with him?’ And I said yes. I now realise that was a mistake.”“The only thing I would say was that as a priest he’d done other good things like burying the dead and celebrating the sacraments, etc. His lawyer was not willing to have me stand up in court and say that. He said, ‘No, we won’t call you. Would you walk to the court with him?’ And I said yes. I now realise that was a mistake.”
UpdatedUpdated
at 9.05pm GMTat 9.05pm GMT
8.47pm GMT8.47pm GMT
20:4720:47
Pell: 'I've never discouraged anyone from going to the police'Pell: 'I've never discouraged anyone from going to the police'
Father Gerald Ridsdale committed more than 130 offences against children as young as four between the 1960s and 80s, including while working as a school chaplain at St Alipius boys’ school in Ballarat. He is now in prison. Ridsdale’s nephew, David Ridsdale, was one of his victims, and he told Pell he was being abused. David Ridsdale has maintained that when he told Pell about the abuse, Pell encouraged him to keep quiet about it, and that Pell asked him what it would take to keep him quiet.Father Gerald Ridsdale committed more than 130 offences against children as young as four between the 1960s and 80s, including while working as a school chaplain at St Alipius boys’ school in Ballarat. He is now in prison. Ridsdale’s nephew, David Ridsdale, was one of his victims, and he told Pell he was being abused. David Ridsdale has maintained that when he told Pell about the abuse, Pell encouraged him to keep quiet about it, and that Pell asked him what it would take to keep him quiet.
Pell has just told the commission David Ridsdale’s account of events is “implausible”.Pell has just told the commission David Ridsdale’s account of events is “implausible”.
It is implausible that I tried to bribe him for a number of reasons. The first of those was that I was aware that the police were already speaking to his uncle and so therefore I would have no motive in trying to prevent him going to the police.It is implausible that I tried to bribe him for a number of reasons. The first of those was that I was aware that the police were already speaking to his uncle and so therefore I would have no motive in trying to prevent him going to the police.
I’ve never discouraged anyone from going to the police. It’s implausible because I was an auxiliary bishop and I had no access to money or – no access to significant resources. It’s implausible because I was an auxiliary bishop of Melbourne and this was a matter for the Ballarat diocese. And it’s implausible because, of course, the attempt to bribe someone is criminal.I’ve never discouraged anyone from going to the police. It’s implausible because I was an auxiliary bishop and I had no access to money or – no access to significant resources. It’s implausible because I was an auxiliary bishop of Melbourne and this was a matter for the Ballarat diocese. And it’s implausible because, of course, the attempt to bribe someone is criminal.
UpdatedUpdated
at 9.06pm GMTat 9.06pm GMT
8.38pm GMT8.38pm GMT
20:3820:38
David Ridsdale was abused by his uncle, notorious Ballarat pedophile Father Gerald Ridsdale. Pell admits to the commission that the fact he accompanied Gerald Ridsdale to court may have been upsetting to David.David Ridsdale was abused by his uncle, notorious Ballarat pedophile Father Gerald Ridsdale. Pell admits to the commission that the fact he accompanied Gerald Ridsdale to court may have been upsetting to David.
Lawyer: “You accept, I think, that he’s [David Ridsdale] always believed right from the day of the phone call that you tried to keep him quiet?Lawyer: “You accept, I think, that he’s [David Ridsdale] always believed right from the day of the phone call that you tried to keep him quiet?
Pell: “I don’t know quite what he believed from that day but if he says that’s the case I’ve certainly got no proof to the contrary. I suspect the fact that I accompanied his uncle to the court would have been something that displeased and upset him.”Pell: “I don’t know quite what he believed from that day but if he says that’s the case I’ve certainly got no proof to the contrary. I suspect the fact that I accompanied his uncle to the court would have been something that displeased and upset him.”
Pell: "I suspect the fact I accompanied his uncle to court is something that would have upset (David)" pic.twitter.com/wom2Vbyv6RPell: "I suspect the fact I accompanied his uncle to court is something that would have upset (David)" pic.twitter.com/wom2Vbyv6R
UpdatedUpdated
at 8.39pm GMTat 8.39pm GMT
8.35pm GMT8.35pm GMT
20:3520:35
Pell now says he was ambushed by 60 Minutes presenter Richard Carleton in an interview with him in 2002.Pell now says he was ambushed by 60 Minutes presenter Richard Carleton in an interview with him in 2002.
“I was ambushed on television,” Pell says.“I was ambushed on television,” Pell says.
Lawyer: “You told Richard Carleton that you thought the conversation [with David Ridsdale about his being abused] occurred after Gerald Ridsdale was in jail, didn’t you?”Lawyer: “You told Richard Carleton that you thought the conversation [with David Ridsdale about his being abused] occurred after Gerald Ridsdale was in jail, didn’t you?”
Pell: “Yes, I had no prior notice that this matter was going to be brought up. My recall is not perfect and there are some details there which some suggestions which I think proved not to be true and Id on’t know whether it was so much a statement as a question asking just what was the sequence of events at that time.”Pell: “Yes, I had no prior notice that this matter was going to be brought up. My recall is not perfect and there are some details there which some suggestions which I think proved not to be true and Id on’t know whether it was so much a statement as a question asking just what was the sequence of events at that time.”
Lawyer: “And you accept that the conversation occurred before he was even charged?”Lawyer: “And you accept that the conversation occurred before he was even charged?”
Pell: “Yes, I now know that’s the case.”Pell: “Yes, I now know that’s the case.”
UpdatedUpdated
at 8.49pm GMTat 8.49pm GMT
8.30pm GMT
20:30
David Ridsdale’s lawyer is asking Pell what he did to help Ridsdale after he called Pell to say that he was being abused by his uncle, Father Gerald Ridsdale. Pell says that because he regarded David Ridsdale as a friend, he was “more relaxed and loose” in his approach to providing help to him.
Lawyer: “Did you ever provide any help to David?”
Pell: “No, I don’t think I did.”
Lawyer: “Did you ever organise any help for him?”
Pell: “No, because I didn’t – I phoned his home on at least one occasion to try to speak with him. He was not there and I was ringing up to see how he was going and what I could do. I don’t think I heard from him again at that time stage.”
Lawyer: “Did you seek to obtain any form of counselling for him?”
Pell: “That was certainly one of the possibilities that went through my mind and if he had wanted to ask me to do that I certainly would have been happy to do so.”
Lawyer: “I’m sorry, I thought you’d agree with me that you didn’t dispute that he expressed a desire for something like a private process to address his needs?
Pell: “I don’t dispute that. I have no recollection of him asking me to set it up.”
Lawyer: “And you didn’t feel that you should make any – take any steps to attempt to set it up?”
Pell: “No, I didn’t because I was a Melbourne auxiliary bishop and the problem had occurred and was going to be dealt with in the Ballarat diocese. If I had been a little bit more careful, I would have suggested to David that I was the Melbourne official and therefore it would be much better if he dealt directly with Ballarat. I regarded him as a friend and so I was a bit more relaxed and loose in my approach to him and in how I could help him because I regarded him as a friend.”
Lawyer: “But in fact, Cardinal, you didn’t do anything for him, isn’t that right?”
Pell: “I spoke to him at some length. He did not ask me to do anything. If he had asked me to do any one or a number of things, I certainly would have done so.”
Pell admits he made no request for financial help for David Ridsdale despite Ridsdale's request @australian #auspol @KKeneally @vanOnselenP
Updated
at 8.44pm GMT
8.22pm GMT
20:22
Pell: "I regret the choice of words. It was badly expressed."
Lawyer: Now, you deny that you tried to persuade David Ridsdale to keep quiet about the abuse of him by Gerald Ridsdale?
Pell: “Well, I’m not even sure what keeping quiet means. I do dispute it, but for a man who was expressing a preference for a church hearing rather than going to the police, I wouldn’t have had any dispute with him on that score, although I have never impeded or discouraged anyone from going to the police.”
Lawyer: “In your evidence on Tuesday, you said, ‘I had no reason to turn my mind to the extent of the evils that [Gerald] Ridsdale had perpetrated.’” Do you remember saying that?”
Pell: “No, I don’t.”
Lawyer: “You said on Tuesday, and I can take you to the transcript if necessary, that Father Ridsdale interfering with children at Inglewood was “a sad story and it wasn’t of much interest to me”. Do you remember saying that?”
Pell: “I remember messing up this sequence completely. I regret the choice of words. I was very confused, I responded poorly.”
Updated
at 8.44pm GMT
8.16pm GMT
20:16
The commission begins
In May, the commission heard allegations that Pell encouraged the child sex abuse victim David Ridsdale, who is the nephew and victim of Gerald Francis Ridsdale, to keep quiet about his abuse.
The commission also previously heard evidence which suggested Pell was involved in the decision to move Ridsdale between parishes once the abuse came to light, including parishes in Mildura, Swan Hill, Warrnambool, Apollo Bay, Ballarat and Mortlake.
David Ridsdale’s lawyer is now questioning Pell.
Lawyer: “I appear for David Ridsdale and I want to ask you some questions about a telephone conversation you had with him in early 1993 when he told you that he had been sexually abused by his uncle, the priest Father Gerald Ridsdale. I understand you accept that you had that telephone conversation but you do not accept the account of the details of that conversation given by David Ridsdale.”
Pell: “We differ on some substantial matters.”
Lawyer: “I understand. And particularly you don’t accept that you said to him ‘What would it take for you to keep quiet?’”
Pell: “No, I certainly don’t accept that.”
Updated
at 8.45pm GMT
8.06pm GMT
20:06
Survivors of child sexual abuse have held a press conference in Rome, with the final day of evidence minutes away from starting. They’ve confirmed they are meeting with Pell tomorrow. It’s unclear whether their requested meeting with Pope Francis has been confirmed though.
Breaking: abuse survivors to meet with pontifical commission tomorrow and #Pell. Waiting to confirm meeting with pope
Ballarat survivors confirm George Pell meeting tomorrow. and possibly with Pope Francis on Friday
Survivors will now meet with Cardinal George #Pell "on their terms" tomorrow - after "restrictions were lifted". pic.twitter.com/twTM1o3ixG
Updated
at 8.28pm GMT
7.57pm GMT
19:57
I’ve just spoken to Leonie Sheedy, head of the Care Leavers Australia Network, which represents survivors of child sexual abuse is foster homes and orphanages. She’s been protesting outside the commission in Sydney along with other survivors for every day of the evidence. She tells me:
I think Pell’s lost all credibility, and he’s done the damage himself. The evidence indicates he’s lied. How can a man with the highest credentials in the Catholic church not be aware of those pedophile priests and continue put others under a series of buses, including Ronald Mulkearns, who is dying, and Archbishop Frank Little, who is dead.
Furness and McClellan, you could see, were exasperated by the dishonesty. We’d like to hear now from the personal secretaries to Pell and others in the church at the time this abuse was occurring. If people were apparently withholding information from people like Pell, we need to hear from the gatekeepers of that information.”
Robert 70yo was in 2 #NSW #BoysHomes #National #Redress Now #PrimeMinister #Turnbull Patron of CLAN Remember I #Vote pic.twitter.com/C7DKZF8jJH
Updated
at 8.00pm GMT
7.43pm GMT
19:43
Guardian cartoonist First Dog on the Moon has provided his take on the evidence so far here. He says:
While the rape and torture of hundreds of children swirled around him, a monstrous wailing storm of blood and terror and unimaginable sin ... Pell heard nothing.
Updated
at 7.55pm GMT
7.42pm GMT
19:42
It seems survivors at the hearings in Rome are about to make a statement ... I’ll keep you posted if and when this happens.
Our producer @EmilyBryan on the lookout as we wait for a statement from survivors ahead of #pell hearing pic.twitter.com/WqsJdZvNui
Updated
at 7.55pm GMT
7.36pm GMT
19:36
If Pope Francis wants to retain his reputation as the people’s pope he must force Cardinal George Pell to either resign or retire, writes Joanne McCarthy for Fairfax. Read her full piece here, and in the meantime here’s an excerpt:
Cardinal George Pell has to resign. Before the week is out, and on the back of his evidence to the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, the cardinal must go, and Pope Francis must be involved.
If not, the Catholic Church in Australia is going to bleed numbers indefinitely. The Pope’s statements about child sexual abuse will be seen as nothing but more words from a church whose standing has been trashed on the issue, and shockingly so over the past three days.
We’re about 20 minutes away from the commission commencing.
Updated
at 8.30pm GMT
7.36pm GMT
19:36
Guardian writer David Marr has analysed yesterday’s evidence:
When Pell began to sketch the outlines of a grubby conspiracy by the Catholic Education Office to keep him in the dark in order to protect the inaction of Little, both the chair of the commission, Peter McClellan, and counsel assisting Gail Furness SC expressed frank disbelief.
Pell denied concocting his evidence to deflect blame from his own inaction. He insisted he had done his duty – his whole duty – by taking the Searson case to Little. “I was not obliged to do more than that.”
He cut a wretched figure in the witness box. After a couple of hours of interrogation he began to look like one of those Francis Bacon portraits of beefy men under torture. On that grey screen, the only colour was his face.
Everyone in the upper reaches of the Melbourne church failed those children. But not until the documents were marshalled today by the royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse was the scale of the failure – or perhaps its stench – so apparent.
Marr’s piece on day three is here, while you can read his analysis of day two here and day one here.
Updated
at 8.30pm GMT
7.36pm GMT
19:36
Melissa Davey with you here as we enter the fourth and final day of evidence from Cardinal George Pell before Australia’s royal commission into institution responses into child sexual abuse.
It’s fair to say Pell has not come off well in the proceedings so far. Counsel assisting, Gail Furness, has twice accused Pell of giving evidence that was “implausible”.
It was implausible that he did not know that notorious pedophile priests, Gerald Ridsdale and Peter Searson were abusing children while everyone else around him did, as was his theory that the Catholic Education Office told senior figures in the church about Searson’s abuse but did not tell him, she said.
Pell says the education office kept him in the dark because they thought he would ask “difficult questions” if the abuse was revealed to him. Justice Peter McClellan told Pell that made no sense.
If the education office wanted to avoid questions being asked, they wouldn’t have told several senior church figures about the abuse, or provided Pell with a list of complaints about Searson’s behaviour, including that he tortured animals in front of children, the commission has heard.
Pell said this wasn’t enough evidence for him to become aware of the full extent of Searson’s abusive nature, or to remove him.
So frustrated have the survivors of child sexual abuse become with Pell’s evidence that they’ve called for a meeting with Pope Francis.
McClellan and Furness have now finished their questioning. With day four about to begin in half an hour, Pell will face questions from lawyers representing victims and the church.
You can share your thoughts with me onTwitter or on Facebook as we go.
Updated
at 8.32pm GMT