This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2016/oct/11/northern-territory-juvenile-detention-royal-commission-hearing-begins-in-darwin-live

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Northern Territory juvenile detention royal commission: hearing begins in Darwin – live Northern Territory juvenile detention royal commission: hearing begins in Darwin – live
(35 minutes later)
4.28am BST
04:28
Peter O’Brien, representing Dylan Voller (heavily focused on by Four Corners) suggests while cross-examining Mitchell that children were being “either prohibited or in some way hindered, or even encouraged against making complaints because of staff threats of retribution” in juvenile detention.
Mitchell says that was the feeling of some children she spoke to in May.
“They might have things denied to them or they might be put back in isolation, or kept longer there” she says.
“These are the kind of things that they alluded to.”
O’Brien wants names.
Mitchell says she’ll have to get advice on that.
4.17am BST
04:17
Phillip Boulton, SC, who is representing Naaja (which he struggled to name at the directions hearing but for the record is the North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency) has asked Mitchell what the challenges are in the NT for children held in detention while on remand (estimated at more than 50% of detainees Mitchell thinks).
“They aren’t routinely separated from kids who aren’t on remand or who have been sentenced, which is actually another provision of [Opcat], so they don’t form those associations and they don’t form those identities” says Mitchell.
She says community based options are “exactly the kind of models that we need”.
You need good accountability and safety structures, of course, she adds. Koori courts in other states are also worth looking at.
4.09am BST
04:09
Sonia Brown-Hill SC, solicitor general and representing the NT government for the commission, is seeking to cross-examine Mitchell about her statements regarding Don Dale’s educational system, because they “might convey that the educational program... is substandard and inappropriate. It certainly is not - ”
Commissioner White cuts her off.
“Perhaps if you’re going to give evidence you might need to get into the witness box, solicitor.”
Brown-Hill goes ahead. She challenges Mitchell’s previous statements, which Brown-Hill interprets as saying that she believed there was no educational system and no air-conditioning at Don Dale.
Mitchell says she was talking about the high security area, and that it was “hot and stifling. Maybe it hadn’t been switched on, she says, but she didn’t see any air-conditioning units.
Updated
at 4.10am BST
4.01am BST
04:01
Detention as a welfare response
Mitchell has urged against using juvenile detention as a “welfare response.”
“If you did an in depth analysis into the backgrounds [of kids in juvenile detention], there would be a significant proportion who have had a substantiated care and protection report about them and also been in the care system,” she says.
Others end up in residential units when a community-based home can’t be found, and if they act up the police are called and they end up in detention.
Detention is the wrong response, she says.
“That doesn’t mean there are no consequences for your actions. You can still be supervised in the community, you can still have conditions placed on you. But being in a jail is not good for kids. At the end of the day it mostly entrenches criminal identities and associations and, for mine, that’s not a good investment in kids.”
3.51am BST3.51am BST
03:5103:51
Mitchell is criticising the NT’s recent introduction of an amendment to the Youth Justice Act. Under the previous government, the use of restraints against juveniles in detention was widened, including spithoods and restraint chairs, and the definition left open to interpretation.Mitchell is criticising the NT’s recent introduction of an amendment to the Youth Justice Act. Under the previous government, the use of restraints against juveniles in detention was widened, including spithoods and restraint chairs, and the definition left open to interpretation.
Following Four Corners, the chief minister, Adam Giles, backflipped on the use of restraint chairs and pulled them from use in juvenile centres (but not adult ones).Following Four Corners, the chief minister, Adam Giles, backflipped on the use of restraint chairs and pulled them from use in juvenile centres (but not adult ones).
The removal of restraint descriptions from the act gave more discretion to the commissioner of the day and was “problematic” in terms of compliance with appropriate standards, says Mitchell.The removal of restraint descriptions from the act gave more discretion to the commissioner of the day and was “problematic” in terms of compliance with appropriate standards, says Mitchell.
3.45am BST3.45am BST
03:4503:45
There are issues with public accountability for correctional facilities, Mitchell is describing.There are issues with public accountability for correctional facilities, Mitchell is describing.
Mitchell says the NT government and corrections have tended to rely on the Children’s Commissioner and Ombudsman as the main independent oversight bodies.Mitchell says the NT government and corrections have tended to rely on the Children’s Commissioner and Ombudsman as the main independent oversight bodies.
However she said while the two bodies had a functional level of independence, they did not have legislated unfettered access, to institutions or their records, which reduces transparency and limits oversight, particularly in regards to critical incidents and the use of force.However she said while the two bodies had a functional level of independence, they did not have legislated unfettered access, to institutions or their records, which reduces transparency and limits oversight, particularly in regards to critical incidents and the use of force.
“The biggest failing is that they don’t have access to that public information.”“The biggest failing is that they don’t have access to that public information.”
3.39am BST3.39am BST
03:3903:39
Use of force in Don Dale 'a matter of normal conduct'
In her capacity for the AHRC, Mitchell has been examining youth detention and oversight, and Australia’s capacity to ratify and implement the optional protocol to the convention against torture (Opcat).In her capacity for the AHRC, Mitchell has been examining youth detention and oversight, and Australia’s capacity to ratify and implement the optional protocol to the convention against torture (Opcat).
She wrote to all governments, including the NT commissioner for corrections, explaining that she was examining how the interests of young people in detention could be monitored under the Opcat.She wrote to all governments, including the NT commissioner for corrections, explaining that she was examining how the interests of young people in detention could be monitored under the Opcat.
Mitchell visited Don Dale, spoke to staff and detainees, and asked detainees to complete a survey.Mitchell visited Don Dale, spoke to staff and detainees, and asked detainees to complete a survey.
“Were you able to identify potential breaches of relative instruments that you’ve identified?,” asks Callaghan.“Were you able to identify potential breaches of relative instruments that you’ve identified?,” asks Callaghan.
“It was clear that isolation was frequently and routinely used and for very long periods of time,” she says, elaborating that it was 23 hours a day for several weeks that some people were held in high security isolation.“It was clear that isolation was frequently and routinely used and for very long periods of time,” she says, elaborating that it was 23 hours a day for several weeks that some people were held in high security isolation.
“It was also clear that the use of force was routinely used as a matter of normal conduct of the business of the organisation, not just... when there was an incident or to overcome an incident.”“It was also clear that the use of force was routinely used as a matter of normal conduct of the business of the organisation, not just... when there was an incident or to overcome an incident.”
“The facility itself is old and ageing and things are broken and toilets are rusty, and as I said before there’s no air-conditioning. It’s very hot. There’s minimal air flow and there are periods of extensive isolation and use of force. And I think all these things are breaches of human rights.“The facility itself is old and ageing and things are broken and toilets are rusty, and as I said before there’s no air-conditioning. It’s very hot. There’s minimal air flow and there are periods of extensive isolation and use of force. And I think all these things are breaches of human rights.
Updated
at 4.01am BST
3.16am BST3.16am BST
03:1603:16
Mitchell visited Don Dale around March this year.Mitchell visited Don Dale around March this year.
A lot of the kids were unhappy with the educational provision there, says Mitchell, and they made the comment that they understood that even if they achieved various scores or got through various programs that it would not necessarily contribute to their qualifications.A lot of the kids were unhappy with the educational provision there, says Mitchell, and they made the comment that they understood that even if they achieved various scores or got through various programs that it would not necessarily contribute to their qualifications.
She says the superintendent at the time was “doing what he could” to redevelop an area for recreational and other programs, and putting fans in because none of the areas were air-conditioned.She says the superintendent at the time was “doing what he could” to redevelop an area for recreational and other programs, and putting fans in because none of the areas were air-conditioned.
“It’s a very difficult facility regardless.”“It’s a very difficult facility regardless.”
UpdatedUpdated
at 3.21am BSTat 3.21am BST
3.02am BST3.02am BST
03:0203:02
On education:On education:
Mitchell visited eight juvenile detention centres in the last year and said there were good examples of education programs, particularly those with one-on-one tailored programs for detainees who had fallen well behind.Mitchell visited eight juvenile detention centres in the last year and said there were good examples of education programs, particularly those with one-on-one tailored programs for detainees who had fallen well behind.
“Some of the better ones have really good connections with the mainstream school in the community where that child is from.”“Some of the better ones have really good connections with the mainstream school in the community where that child is from.”
“Many of these young people really enjoy going to the school. For some, it’s the first time they have been at school for a steady period for quite a while so it is a chance for them to catch up a bit and get back on track.”“Many of these young people really enjoy going to the school. For some, it’s the first time they have been at school for a steady period for quite a while so it is a chance for them to catch up a bit and get back on track.”
UpdatedUpdated
at 3.16am BSTat 3.16am BST
2.56am BST2.56am BST
02:5602:56
Mitchell is being quizzed on Australia’s action on various international laws and treaties which are relevant to the detention of children.Mitchell is being quizzed on Australia’s action on various international laws and treaties which are relevant to the detention of children.
She’s made particular mention of the UN convention against torture, and the optional protocol which Australia is currently considering and which would provide oversight mechanisms in places of detention.She’s made particular mention of the UN convention against torture, and the optional protocol which Australia is currently considering and which would provide oversight mechanisms in places of detention.
There is a lot of legal groundwork being done here.There is a lot of legal groundwork being done here.
They move to the convention on the rights of the child and the elements which relate to detention of children.They move to the convention on the rights of the child and the elements which relate to detention of children.
Mitchell notes children “by their nature are developmentally vulnerable”, “have relatively less power as individuals in the world”, and that “institutions are inherently risky places”.Mitchell notes children “by their nature are developmentally vulnerable”, “have relatively less power as individuals in the world”, and that “institutions are inherently risky places”.
“Where children are involved and the relative imbalance of power between adults who are carers and children is heightened, there is much greater risk of abuse and exploitation, and silencing.”“Where children are involved and the relative imbalance of power between adults who are carers and children is heightened, there is much greater risk of abuse and exploitation, and silencing.”
She says being away from family and advocates adds an additional vulnerability.She says being away from family and advocates adds an additional vulnerability.
“Human rights are not rocket science,” says Mitchell. “Everyone deserves the right to be OK and to do well in life.”“Human rights are not rocket science,” says Mitchell. “Everyone deserves the right to be OK and to do well in life.”
“There is a large body of work and, yes, much of it is interrelated but there are also some very specific things around children’s needs which that we need to be cognisant of, particularly when a government is setting out what services and supports and laws it’s going to make in relation to children.”“There is a large body of work and, yes, much of it is interrelated but there are also some very specific things around children’s needs which that we need to be cognisant of, particularly when a government is setting out what services and supports and laws it’s going to make in relation to children.”
Asked what standards are needed, Mitchell says:Asked what standards are needed, Mitchell says:
UpdatedUpdated
at 3.16am BSTat 3.16am BST
2.35am BST2.35am BST
02:3502:35
Megan Mitchell, the national children’s commissioner at the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC), has taken the stand.Megan Mitchell, the national children’s commissioner at the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC), has taken the stand.
At an international level, breaches of human rights are an embarrassment to a country, and can impact diplomatic and moral authority, she says.At an international level, breaches of human rights are an embarrassment to a country, and can impact diplomatic and moral authority, she says.
Domestically, international treaties need to be written into law after they’ve been been ratified in Australia, a different approach to some other places where the treaties become law as soon as they’re ratified.Domestically, international treaties need to be written into law after they’ve been been ratified in Australia, a different approach to some other places where the treaties become law as soon as they’re ratified.
“Many human rights in our system are not backed up by legal protections,” she says.“Many human rights in our system are not backed up by legal protections,” she says.
“The most common way that Australia does not comply with international human rights standards is that we do not provide legal protection in our system for human rights.”“The most common way that Australia does not comply with international human rights standards is that we do not provide legal protection in our system for human rights.”
After questioning from counsel, Mitchell says the AHRC identifies noncompliance with human rights obligations, and makes recommendations to government but it’s up to the government of the day to act. The AHRC has no power to ensure compliance.After questioning from counsel, Mitchell says the AHRC identifies noncompliance with human rights obligations, and makes recommendations to government but it’s up to the government of the day to act. The AHRC has no power to ensure compliance.
UpdatedUpdated
at 3.10am BSTat 3.10am BST
2.21am BST
02:21
Jake Roper, one of the juvenile detainees at the centre of the 2014 teargassing incident, is in court for the hearing today. He’s come up from Tennant Creek with two of his aunties.
Updated
at 2.30am BST
2.14am BST
02:14
The NT government has withdrawn its financial support for the legal costs of former attorney general and minister for justice John Elferink his lawyer says.
Andrew Harris SC says had they known the NT government was not covering the costs at last month’s directions hearing, he would not have applied for leave to represent Elferink for the whole of the royal commission, beyond just the days relevant to Elferink.
It’s previously been reported the NT government’s budget of $7.5m for its own commission costs included up to $30,000 for legal assistance to former and current government members like Elferink. I’ve contacted the NT government to get clarity around what’s happened now.
Harris takes a swipe at the ABC.
“In its treatment of Mr Elferink, the Four Corners program was dishonest and unprofessional.”
Updated
at 2.21am BST
2.01am BST
02:01
Callaghan runs through some numbers, noting that while the inquiry extends beyond the situation of Aboriginal people, it’s impossible to ignore the overrepresentation of Aboriginal children in the protection and detention systems.
As at 2015:
About 30% of the NT population was Indigenous.95% of children in detention were Indigenous.86% of children subject to care and protection orders in 2014-15 were Indigenous
The commission will examine the concept of overrepresentation, foetal alcohol spectrum disorder, psychological and intergeneration trauma, hearing loss, and a whole range of medico-social issues that confront disadvantaged young people in the Northern Territory.
Efforts have been and are being made to deal with the issues that confront us, says Callaghan, but the commission will “scrutinise the degree to which these efforts have been coordinated,” he says.
In speaking to the commission Tom Calma described the 2007 intervention was a “significant distraction to policy and program efforts that were being undertaken at the time.”
Updated
at 2.22am BST
1.50am BST
01:50
'Confront our inquiry mentality'
A very strong statement from counsel assisting, Peter Callaghan SC which goes to the heart of many concerns surrounding this commission – that it will deliver a set of recommendations only to see them ignored by government, as has happened many times before.
“Our review [of the reports] makes good the proposition advanced by Commissioner Gooda at the directions hearing when he said there was not a need for more to be done to describe the issues. With that observation, commissioners, we respectfully agree.
“But the very fact there have been so many reports prepared already and the very existence of this commission after so much has been said and written and raised, we suggest, another issue all together.
“It invites a question: do we need to confront some sort of inquiry mentality in which investigations is allowed as a substitution for action and reporting is accepted as a replacement for results? The bare fact that there has been so much said and so much written over such a long time is suggestive of a persistent failure that should not be allowed to endure.”
Updated
at 1.54am BST
1.45am BST
01:45
“Though there is much yet to be learned, much is already known,” says Callaghan, noting numerous other inquiries have already addressed many of the concerns at the heart of the commission’s terms of reference.
“We have identified more than 50 reports that have some relevance,” he says.
“Most of these have been produced in the last 10 years.”
All, including two royal commissions and 23 independent inquiries, gave relevant recommendations and findings.
The first report Callaghan brings up is the royal commission into Aboriginal deaths in custody, which examined the deaths of 99 people, including three who died in juvenile detention - one at just 14.
He reads out a number of recommendations, including number 62, which recognised the problems affecting Aboriginal juveniles in particular were “so widespread and have such potentially disastrous repercussions for the future” that there was an urgent need for governments to work together.
Updated
at 1.51am BST
1.38am BST
01:38
The hearing has begun, with commissioner Mick Gooda addressing the room. It’s a short speech, but he says the consultations with stakeholder groups and communities across the NT has been “extremely worthwhile”.
Counsel assisting the commission Peter Callaghan SC is telling the commissioners the evidence this week will not delve deeply into the detail of incidents and “established incidents of controversy”.
However he also flags that evidence from some witnesses this week, including former children’s commissioner Dr Howard Bath and his successor Colleen Gwynn, will have evidence relevant to multiple hearings, and they may be recalled later for further questioning.
Updated
at 1.52am BST
1.32am BST
01:32
Federal attorney general George Brandis this morning said the government would be open to extending the royal commission.
Speaking on AM, Brandis said it would be ideal for the royal commission to “deal with the business before it as efficiently and at least cost as it can.”
However, “having said that … the government would always be open to an approach from them if they needed more time,” he said.
“If next year they come to me and say they need an extension of time... then we would look sympathetically at that.”
Asked about the cost, Brandis said an agreement struck between the federal and NT governments to split it 50/50 would stand.
The NT chief minister, Michael Gunner, has previously expressed dissatisfaction that his predecessor, Adam Giles, gave the verbal agreement prior to the August election without any preparation or budgeting.
1.18am BST
01:18
Ahead of things kicking off today, last month’s directions hearing heard a preemptive defence by commissioner Gooda, against accusations he was biased.
The claims, made by former attorney general and minister for corrections, justice, children and families, and health, John Elferink, was based on a tweet Gooda sent after watching Four Corners, that the whole NT government should be sacked.
There is speculation Elferink was considering a challenge to Gooda’s appointment. That challenge loses validity the longer Elferink waits, so if he decides to go ahead, it is likely to be this week.
12.54am BST
00:54
Witnesses:
This public hearing will hear evidence from authors of previous reports and inquiries, and other experts with knowledge relevant to the commission’s remit.
The commission has called the following people:
Megan Mitchell, Australian Human Rights Commission
Dr Howard Bath, Former Children’s Commissioner
Colleen Gwynne, Children’s Commissioner
Carolyn Richards, Former Northern Territory Ombudsman
Prof Tom Calma, Author, multiple reports
Muriel Bamblett, Author, “Growing them Stronger”
Julian Cleary, Amnesty International
Damien Howard, Psychologist
Jody Barney, Translator
Prof John Boulton, Paediatrician
12.46am BST
00:46
Good morning, and welcome to our live coverage of the royal commission into the protection and detention of children in the Northern Territory, which begins its first public hearing in Darwin today.
Background:
The commission was called by prime minister Malcolm Turnbull in July, amid national outrage at the mistreatment of juvenile detainees broadcast by ABC’s Four Corners program.
The program included the now infamous footage of Dylan Voller being covered in a spithood and tied by his ankles, wrists and neck in a restraint chair for almost two hours.
It also covered a 2014 incident in the Don Dale juvenile detention centre when one detainee, Jake Roper, got out of his cell in the isolated Behavioural Management Unit and began causing damage. Guards were called in from the adult prison, and tear gas was used against Roper and another five detainees who were still inside their cells.
Four of those other boys are currently suing the NT government for alleged assault and battery.
While these were high profile incidents, the first hearing of the royal commission is unlikely to delve deeply into the details of them, but rather will be going over the numerous inquiries and reports previously conducted.
The commission has been tasked to examine 10 years of policy and practise in the NT, relating to child protection and detention, back to 2006 when the Youth Justice Act was introduced.
The first public hearing will go for three days this week, and further hearings are scheduled for every month between now and March – the current reporting date.
Currently just 25 days of public hearings are scheduled, but the commissioners have indicated they’ll probably ask for an extension of time, and this morning, the attorney general George Brandis said the federal government would be open to that.
Read about the co-commissioners, Margaret White and Mick Gooda, here.
Read about calls for the commission to be expanded beyond the Northern Territory (after alleged mistreatment was uncovered at other juvenile facilities interstate) here.