This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/nov/01/black-cab-shape-not-distinctive-enough-to-be-trademark-say-judges
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Black cab shape not distinctive enough to be trademark, say judges | Black cab shape not distinctive enough to be trademark, say judges |
(35 minutes later) | |
New-style taxis could soon roll on to city roads after court of appeal judges ruled that the shape of the traditional London black cab was not distinctive enough to be a trademark. | |
The London Taxi Company wanted to claim exclusive rights to the black cab shape and thwart a rival firm. But Lord Justice Kitchin and Lord Justice Floyd have upheld a ruling made last year by a high court judge. | |
In January 2016, Mr Justice Arnold ruled that the shape was not a “valid registered trademark” after a high court hearing in London. | In January 2016, Mr Justice Arnold ruled that the shape was not a “valid registered trademark” after a high court hearing in London. |
Appeal judges dismissed a challenge by the taxi company on Wednesday – although Lord Justice Floyd indicated that supreme court justices might be asked to consider the case. | Appeal judges dismissed a challenge by the taxi company on Wednesday – although Lord Justice Floyd indicated that supreme court justices might be asked to consider the case. |
Rival Ecotive said it was now in a position to put its electric Metrocab into production. | |
Confectionery giant Nestle earlier this year lost a similar trademark fight over the shape of its KitKat chocolate bar. | |
Specialist lawyers said Wednesday’s ruling showed how hard it was for manufacturers to trademark shapes. | Specialist lawyers said Wednesday’s ruling showed how hard it was for manufacturers to trademark shapes. |
“The London Taxi Company has been trying to prevent a rival manufacturer from producing a new style of London taxi which it claims infringes its intellectual property rights in the original shape,” said lawyer Mike Gardner, who is based at law firm Wedlake Bell. | “The London Taxi Company has been trying to prevent a rival manufacturer from producing a new style of London taxi which it claims infringes its intellectual property rights in the original shape,” said lawyer Mike Gardner, who is based at law firm Wedlake Bell. |
“The court of appeal has dashed the notion that there is any trademark protection for the classic design.” | “The court of appeal has dashed the notion that there is any trademark protection for the classic design.” |
He added: “The case illustrates how difficult it can be for anyone to obtain a permanent monopoly to protect the shape of something as a brand – even where that shape is iconic. The loss of its trademark registrations effectively leaves the London Taxi Company powerless to prevent competitors producing similar-looking vehicles.” | He added: “The case illustrates how difficult it can be for anyone to obtain a permanent monopoly to protect the shape of something as a brand – even where that shape is iconic. The loss of its trademark registrations effectively leaves the London Taxi Company powerless to prevent competitors producing similar-looking vehicles.” |