This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2018/dec/06/government-morrison-nauru-energy-encryption-politics-live-shorten-labor-liberal

The article has changed 22 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Coalition faces losing Nauru bill battle on last sitting day of year – politics live Coalition faces losing Nauru bill battle on last sitting day of year – politics live
(35 minutes later)
This is the most sunshine and lollypops and rainbow cakes served by unicorns take on this ever uttered in the history of capitalism:
https://twitter.com/SkyNewsAust/status/1070405772004081664
The bells have rung and parliament has begun.
Scott Morrison wandered over to Tony Abbott and had a chat to start the parliamentary morning off.
Thinking through some scenarios about today
It looks at the moment like the government is going to lose this vote on transferring people from Nauru and Manus.
The Senate crossbenchers appear locked and loaded, and the numbers appear to be there in the House.
Losing a legislative vote is extremely rare.
It can be interpreted as a vote of no confidence in the government of the day. So the next logical question in my mind after absorbing these facts is will Labor take things to the next step this afternoon and move a motion of no confidence in the government?
At this stage, it doesn’t seem likely. Some independents have confidence and supply agreements with the government, and don’t want an election any time before next year.The only rule on the last sitting day of the year is anything can happen. But a formal no-confidence vote seems unlikely ... as of now.
So while you all marinate on no confidence and de facto no confidence motions, here are a couple more of your snapshots of the 2018 political year:
Sophie: I think we’re in a big political moment right now. The far right of the Liberal party have revealed themselves as primarily preoccupied with fighting culture wars on climate, sexuality, gender and immigration – and willing to go to extraordinary, destructive lengths to pursue their ideological ends. The Labor party have revealed themselves emboldened to stand up only when they don’t believe they face any electoral threat in doing so (hello, Adani); and the Australian people have shown that grassroots organising and collective action is well and truly alive and kicking.
From the many many rallies calling for refugees to be brought here to safety, to the extraordinary efforts of LGBTI activists and their allies to ensure a YES vote in the destructive plebiscite (one year on, I know), to the grassroots organising of Democracy In Colour activists fighting race-baiting and division during the Victorian election, the mobilisation of women in Queensland to see abortion finally decriminalised, to the persistent efforts of First Nations people, farmers, climate activists and young people to protect the climate and stop Adani ... this year has had some awful, depressing political moments; but it has also been a year of community power.
Ivy: I don’t think I will ever forget or forgive the Coalition for suspending parliament on the day Malcolm Turnbull was deposed in order to avoid the scrutiny of the House – a shameful, undemocratic, action, as far as I was concerned.
Kate: At the beginning of the year it seemed that the composition of the Senate changed every week. Other than that, the many demonstrations of narcissism (mostly from the ‘Right’) are what I take from the year just passed.
Patricia: A standout for me was the Liberal party floundering in Victoria during the recent election campaign when we had a shocking incident in Melbourne with the owner of a famous coffee shop, Pellegrini’s, being killed. [Scott] Morrison couldn’t wait to make what he thought would be political gains from this incident, holding a press conference 50 metres from Pellegrini’s doorstep and preaching hatred and fear to the people of Victoria and the country. The voters gave Morrison their reply and decimated the Victorian Liberal party.
A sign I think that the worm has turned. A sign of hope for decency to be returned in this once-great country. A sign that Morrison will be the shortest-term PM that this country has seen in its history, after the federal election.
Scott: Simply everything the senator Penny Wong has said or done has been a highlight. Is that too gushy?
OK, let’s try this: 2018 highlight is senator Penny Wong’s reaction as the marriage equality result was revealed. It was a beautiful reminder that, after all the noise and agendas and distractions were removed, it was simply a question about people and their relationships. People matter.
Just a little more on no confidence and de facto no-confidence motions as per the House of Reps practice.
A government may consider it appropriate, if it is defeated on a matter which it deems to be of sufficient importance, to seek the feeling of the House at the first opportunity by means of a motion of confidence. A motion of confidence could also be used pre-emptively – for example, in October 1975 prime minister Whitlam, following an announcement of the opposition’s intention to delay in the Senate bills appropriating money for the ordinary annual services of the government, moved a motion of confidence in the government. An amendment was moved and negatived and the original motion agreed to.[261]
In 1903 the government was defeated on an important amendment to a conciliation and arbitration bill. Prime minister Barton stated that the vote created a situation of some gravity and the ministry would consider its position before any further business was undertaken.
The next day he announced that the government could not accept the amendment or proceed with the bill as amended and, therefore, the government intended to drop the bill.[262]
The same government also decided not to proceed with the Papua (British Papua New Guinea) bill after the government was defeated on certain amendments.[263]
... Although it has been claimed that the loss of control of the business of the House is a matter over which governments should resign, the loss of a vote on such an issue is not necessarily fatal for a government.
In 1908 prime minister Deakin resigned when he accepted that any amendment to a motion to alter the hour of next meeting was a challenge to his government, and the 1909 and 1931 resignations of governments followed from similar acceptances (see below).
In each case the governments were on the point of losing the necessary support to remain in power.
In 1923, however, the government having lost control of the business of the House the previous evening, prime minister Bruce confidently assured the opposition “the government will very soon take it back into its own hands today”.[267]
During 1962 and 1963, when the Menzies government had a floor majority[268] of one, it suffered a number of defeats on procedural motions[269] and, although it did not resign, its precarious majority was a factor which led to an early dissolution.[270]
During the 43rd parliament the minority Gillard government lost a significant number of divisions.[271]
In the 45th parliament the Turnbull government, with a floor majority of one, was defeated on several procedural motions.[272]
While there has never been a successful vote of no confidence or censure of a government in the House of Representatives, on eight occasions governments have either resigned or advised a dissolution following their defeat on other questions:
Deakin Ministry, 21 April 1904—The Government resigned following its defeat 29:38 in committee (detail stage) on an amendment moved by the Opposition to the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Bill.[273]
Watson Ministry, 12 August 1904—The Government resigned following its defeat 34:36 on an amendment to its motion that the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Bill, which it inherited from the previous Government and carried through the committee (detail) stage, be recommitted for consideration of certain clauses and a schedule.[274]
Reid Ministry, 30 June 1905—The Government resigned following the House agreeing 42:25 to an amendment to the Address in Reply (proposing to add the words ‘but are of the opinion that practical measures should be proceeded with’).[275]
Deakin Ministry, 10 November 1908—The Government resigned following its defeat 13:49 on an amendment to the motion to alter the hour of next meeting.[276]
Fisher Ministry, 27 May 1909—The Government resigned following defeat 30:39 on a motion moved by a private Member to adjourn debate on the Address in Reply.[277]
Bruce–Page Ministry, 10 September 1929—The Governor-General accepted the Prime Minister’s advice to dissolve the House after an amendment had been agreed to in committee (detail stage) to the Maritime Industries Bill (35:34). The amendment was to the effect that proclamation of the Act would not be earlier than its submission to the people either at a referendum or a general election.[278]
Scullin Ministry, 25 November 1931—The Governor-General accepted the Prime Minister’s advice to dissolve the House after the question ‘That the House do now adjourn’ was agreed to 37:32, against the wishes of the Government.[279]
Fadden Ministry, 3 October 1941—The Government resigned when, during the Budget debate in committee of supply, an opposition amendment to the effect that the first item in the estimates be reduced by a nominal sum (£1) was agreed to 36:33.[280]
Again, a government losing a vote on the floor happens – when it comes to procedure.Again, a government losing a vote on the floor happens – when it comes to procedure.
Legislative losses are very, very rare.Legislative losses are very, very rare.
The last time a govt lost a vote on legislation on the floor of the HoR was in 1929 when the Maritime Industries Bill was amended by 35 votes to 34. PM Stanley Brice called an election the next day - and lost. #auspolThe last time a govt lost a vote on legislation on the floor of the HoR was in 1929 when the Maritime Industries Bill was amended by 35 votes to 34. PM Stanley Brice called an election the next day - and lost. #auspol
Stanley Bruce took that loss as a de facto loss of confidence, which is why he called the election.Stanley Bruce took that loss as a de facto loss of confidence, which is why he called the election.
This government doesn’t have to accept the loss as a no confidence. As the House practices lays out:This government doesn’t have to accept the loss as a no confidence. As the House practices lays out:
Withdrawal of confidence shown by defeat on other questionsWithdrawal of confidence shown by defeat on other questions
The withdrawal by the House of its confidence in the Government may be shown: The withdrawal by the House of its confidence in the government may be shown:
By a direct vote of censure of or no confidence in the Government. By a direct vote of censure of or no confidence in the government.
By defeat on an issue central to government policy or rejecting a legislative measure proposed by the Government, the acceptance of which the Government has declared to be of vital importance. Conversely, a vote by the House agreeing to a particular legislative measure or provision contrary to the advice and consent of the Government could similarly be regarded as a matter of confidence. Following defeat a Government may choose to resign, as in April and August 1904, 1929 and 1941 (see page 322), or to seek a direct vote of confidence. By defeat on an issue central to government policy or rejecting a legislative measure proposed by the government, the acceptance of which the government has declared to be of vital importance. Conversely, a vote by the House agreeing to a particular legislative measure or provision contrary to the advice and consent of the government could similarly be regarded as a matter of confidence. Following defeat a government may choose to resign, as in April and August 1904, 1929 and 1941 (see page 322), or to seek a direct vote of confidence.
By defeat of the Government on a vote not necessarily central to government policy but accepted by the Government as one of confidence, as in 1905, 1908, 1909 and 1931 (see page 322). By defeat of the government on a vote not necessarily central to government policy but accepted by the government as one of confidence, as in 1905, 1908, 1909 and 1931 (see page 322).
A defeat of the Government in the House of Representatives does not necessarily mean it has lost the confidence of the House or that it ought to resign. As Jennings states: A defeat of the government in the House of Representatives does not necessarily mean it has lost the confidence of the House or that it ought to resign. As Jennings states:
It must not be thought … that a single defeat necessarily demands either resignation or dissolution. Such a result follows only where the defeat implies loss of confidence … [259]It must not be thought … that a single defeat necessarily demands either resignation or dissolution. Such a result follows only where the defeat implies loss of confidence … [259]
What a Government will treat as a matter of sufficient importance to demand resignation or dissolution is, primarily, a question for the Government. The Opposition can always test the opinion of the House by a vote of no confidence. No Government [in the United Kingdom] since 1832 has failed to regard such a motion, if carried, as decisive. A House whose opinion was rejected has always at hand the ultimate remedy of the refusal of supply.[260] What a government will treat as a matter of sufficient importance to demand resignation or dissolution is, primarily, a question for the government. The opposition can always test the opinion of the House by a vote of no confidence. No government [in the United Kingdom] since 1832 has failed to regard such a motion, if carried, as decisive. A House whose opinion was rejected has always at hand the ultimate remedy of the refusal of supply.[260]
Some more of your snapshots:Some more of your snapshots:
Greg: The major turn around and thus lowlight of the year was the brain snap of the Liberal Party in August. They shot themselves in the foot and have continued to do so while their feet are in their mouths since...fancy thinking the public would wear Peter Dutton when their best marketing politician Malcolm Turnbull was actually making headway. Greg: The major turnaround and thus lowlight of the year was the brain snap of the Liberal party in August. They shot themselves in the foot and have continued to do so while their feet are in their mouths since ... fancy thinking the public would wear Peter Dutton when their best marketing politician Malcolm Turnbull was actually making headway.
They even managed to sideline their best performing minister, Julie Bishop and lost the balance of power as well. They even managed to sideline their best-performing minister, Julie Bishop, and lost the balance of power as well.
They lost a safe blue ribbon seat and helped force the Victorian Liberal party into four more years in exile and possibly longer. They lost a safe blue-ribbon seat and helped force the Victorian Liberal party into four more years in exile and possibly longer.
They killed the chance for a climate and emissions/energy policy and ruined the chances of a win by the Coalition in NSW. And what was it all for? Payback by the far right? They killed the chance for a climate and emissions/energy policy and ruined the chances of a win by the Coalition in NSW. And what was it all for? Payback by the far right? ...
...The highlight for the year was the children’s strike for climate change that was only soured by conservative politicians who abused them for giving voice to their concerns. The highlight for the year was the children’s strike for climate change that was only soured by conservative politicians who abused them for giving voice to their concerns.
These children in a very short time will vote and breathe a new life into politics which badly needs resuscitating.These children in a very short time will vote and breathe a new life into politics which badly needs resuscitating.
The regret of the year has to be Manus and Nauru but it has been the same regret for nearly a decade.The regret of the year has to be Manus and Nauru but it has been the same regret for nearly a decade.
Harry: I want to say that there are many who post BTL who have been standouts with their wit, drollery, their astute observations and sometimes biting comments. There has been many a coffee spurt caused by the usual suspects. Their contributions always enlivens the blog and infuriates the conservatives, which can only be a Good Thing.I hope every one has a safe and happy holiday period. With only ten sitting days in eight months coming up we politics tragics are going to go through withdrawal symptoms without Politics Live. Harry: I want to say that there are many who post BTL who have been standouts with their wit, drollery, their astute observations and sometimes biting comments. There has been many a coffee spurt caused by the usual suspects. Their contributions always enlivens the blog and infuriates the conservatives, which can only be a Good Thing. I hope every one has a safe and happy holiday period. With only 10 sitting days in eight months coming up we politics tragics are going to go through withdrawal symptoms without Politics Live.
Tony Abbott will be delivering his Indigenous Blueprint at 9.30 in the House.Tony Abbott will be delivering his Indigenous Blueprint at 9.30 in the House.
Compulsory reading, obvs Compulsory reading, obvs.
The encryption bill debate will come to the House in the first session this morning, where it will be amended as per request of the PJCIS committee.The encryption bill debate will come to the House in the first session this morning, where it will be amended as per request of the PJCIS committee.
The government amendments will be moved in the House and then once it is amended (which it will be because Labor is on board) then it goes to the Senate and then the security agencies can start sending out all those notices. The government amendments will be moved in the House and then once it is amended (which it will be because Labor is onboard) then it goes to the Senate and then the security agencies can start sending out all those notices.
Joy.Joy.
Anyone who missed the encryption report being tabled, you’ll find it here.Anyone who missed the encryption report being tabled, you’ll find it here.
See – WORRIEDSee – WORRIED
The government has offered the cross benchers a briefing on Operation Sovereign Borders in an effort to derail today's vote on Nauru/Manus. Parliamentarians are permitted to bring one adviser @AmyRemeikis #auspolThe government has offered the cross benchers a briefing on Operation Sovereign Borders in an effort to derail today's vote on Nauru/Manus. Parliamentarians are permitted to bring one adviser @AmyRemeikis #auspol
So, where are we on the asylum seeker medical evacuation bill?So, where are we on the asylum seeker medical evacuation bill?
The motion to bring the amendments to the Migration Act back to the Senate, with the medical evacuations (with all the amendments including ministerial signoff, border protection and national security controls yadda yadda) has to pop up between 12.45pm and 1.50pm (just before Senate question time).The motion to bring the amendments to the Migration Act back to the Senate, with the medical evacuations (with all the amendments including ministerial signoff, border protection and national security controls yadda yadda) has to pop up between 12.45pm and 1.50pm (just before Senate question time).
Once passed there (and it looks to be happening with 39 votes out of the 76 Senate votes) it will head to the House after question time.Once passed there (and it looks to be happening with 39 votes out of the 76 Senate votes) it will head to the House after question time.
If all the crossbenchers (bar Bob Katter) vote with Labor and the Greens, you are looking at 75 to 74 (minus whatever pairs are going on) and that’s the simple majority they need to have it passed.If all the crossbenchers (bar Bob Katter) vote with Labor and the Greens, you are looking at 75 to 74 (minus whatever pairs are going on) and that’s the simple majority they need to have it passed.
This is not a suspension of standing orders, which needs the absolute majority (75 plus one). It just needs more people on one side than the other. And that is why the government is so worried.This is not a suspension of standing orders, which needs the absolute majority (75 plus one). It just needs more people on one side than the other. And that is why the government is so worried.
Alan Jones and Scott Morrison also discussed Jim Molan, who was in an unwinnable position on the Liberals’ Senate ticket, made it to the Senate because none of our parliamentarians apparently knew where they came from, or how the constitution would deal with that, and is now back to an unwinnable position on the Senate ticket. (Again, thank you Gareth Hutchens.)Alan Jones and Scott Morrison also discussed Jim Molan, who was in an unwinnable position on the Liberals’ Senate ticket, made it to the Senate because none of our parliamentarians apparently knew where they came from, or how the constitution would deal with that, and is now back to an unwinnable position on the Senate ticket. (Again, thank you Gareth Hutchens.)
Alan Jones: The Liberal party don’t want him, they put him in an unwinnable position.Alan Jones: The Liberal party don’t want him, they put him in an unwinnable position.
This has angered people enormously, you’d be aware of that. What of the future, what can you tell our listeners of the future of Senator Jim Molan?This has angered people enormously, you’d be aware of that. What of the future, what can you tell our listeners of the future of Senator Jim Molan?
Morrison: Well, as you know Jim stood for that selection and it was the largest –Morrison: Well, as you know Jim stood for that selection and it was the largest –
Jones: And it was factionalised and stacked against him …Jones: And it was factionalised and stacked against him …
Morrison: It was the largest Senate selection I think that has ever been held.Morrison: It was the largest Senate selection I think that has ever been held.
Jones: He spoke brilliantly.Jones: He spoke brilliantly.
Morrison: There were over 500 people. There was a whole bunch of people actually in the very conservative part of our party who didn’t show up, and that’s a bit strange as to why they didn’t show up and vote for him on that occasion.Morrison: There were over 500 people. There was a whole bunch of people actually in the very conservative part of our party who didn’t show up, and that’s a bit strange as to why they didn’t show up and vote for him on that occasion.
Jones: But you understand this is our fastest-growing demographic, the over-65s, 280,000 military veterans, and they are angry. What’s his future?Jones: But you understand this is our fastest-growing demographic, the over-65s, 280,000 military veterans, and they are angry. What’s his future?
Morrison: Well, where there’s an opportunity for Jim to continue to serve I’m sure he’ll put his hand up for something like that.Morrison: Well, where there’s an opportunity for Jim to continue to serve I’m sure he’ll put his hand up for something like that.
Jones: No, no, no. Well, you put your hand up for him.Jones: No, no, no. Well, you put your hand up for him.
Morrison: Well, I was the one who introduced him into the Liberal party, Alan.Morrison: Well, I was the one who introduced him into the Liberal party, Alan.
Jones: *laughs* We’re beaten by time, we could talk until midday.Jones: *laughs* We’re beaten by time, we could talk until midday.
Morrison: I’m a big supporter of Jim but, I mean, he’s gotta be elected in accordance with the party process.Morrison: I’m a big supporter of Jim but, I mean, he’s gotta be elected in accordance with the party process.
Jones: Yeah, he’s got to meet the demands of the factions. You know that.Jones: Yeah, he’s got to meet the demands of the factions. You know that.
Richard Di Natale said he was “reasonably confident” there was the support for the Nauru and Manus Island asylum seeker evacuations to occur.Richard Di Natale said he was “reasonably confident” there was the support for the Nauru and Manus Island asylum seeker evacuations to occur.
The government keeps telling us the “people smugglers will start right up again”. (This was Paul Fletcher, the latest government minister to have a journalist forget what he was responsible for live on air, after Fran Kelly forgetting Angus Taylor’s name on radio yesterday. It’s not our fault. There have been so many ministerial changes and we are all tired.)The government keeps telling us the “people smugglers will start right up again”. (This was Paul Fletcher, the latest government minister to have a journalist forget what he was responsible for live on air, after Fran Kelly forgetting Angus Taylor’s name on radio yesterday. It’s not our fault. There have been so many ministerial changes and we are all tired.)
Fletcher told Sky that Labor was weakening border security by “playing games” in the parliament.Fletcher told Sky that Labor was weakening border security by “playing games” in the parliament.
But the government has also been telling us they have been removing children and their families from Nauru and want them all gone by the end of the year, and as far as I have seen, the borders haven’t crumbled.But the government has also been telling us they have been removing children and their families from Nauru and want them all gone by the end of the year, and as far as I have seen, the borders haven’t crumbled.
The amended Kerryn Phelps plan would need two doctors to sign off on a medical transfer. Then the minister would have to sign off on it. If the minister doesn’t, he or she would have to publish their reasons within three days, although the minister does have the power to reject transfers on national security or border protection grounds, which is a pretty broad field.The amended Kerryn Phelps plan would need two doctors to sign off on a medical transfer. Then the minister would have to sign off on it. If the minister doesn’t, he or she would have to publish their reasons within three days, although the minister does have the power to reject transfers on national security or border protection grounds, which is a pretty broad field.
If rejected, an independent health advisory panel would review the decision.If rejected, an independent health advisory panel would review the decision.
Labor wants the minister to still control the powers (David Coleman), but put the focus on the advice of doctors.Labor wants the minister to still control the powers (David Coleman), but put the focus on the advice of doctors.
The government is freaking out because it would also apply to the men on Manus Island, where there are about 500 refugees (granted refugee status) and 126 asylum seekers (still waiting to be assessed) and that is something everyone has been fairly happy to ignore up to this point.The government is freaking out because it would also apply to the men on Manus Island, where there are about 500 refugees (granted refugee status) and 126 asylum seekers (still waiting to be assessed) and that is something everyone has been fairly happy to ignore up to this point.
There are 10 children still on Nauru. Four have been accepted for resettlement in the United States and four others will be staying on the island with their families (we are told by choice).There are 10 children still on Nauru. Four have been accepted for resettlement in the United States and four others will be staying on the island with their families (we are told by choice).
While we are dealing with the day’s shenanigans, I’ll also be dropping in some of the notes you have sent through about what stood out to you about 2018 in Australian politics. Apologies if I don’t get to yours, but rest assured I will be reading them all.While we are dealing with the day’s shenanigans, I’ll also be dropping in some of the notes you have sent through about what stood out to you about 2018 in Australian politics. Apologies if I don’t get to yours, but rest assured I will be reading them all.
From Paul: one that really grabbed (and moved) me was Susan Lamb’s very emotional speech about the circumstances of her citizenship mess back in February. It was a potent reminder of the very human lives behind the corflute facades.From Paul: one that really grabbed (and moved) me was Susan Lamb’s very emotional speech about the circumstances of her citizenship mess back in February. It was a potent reminder of the very human lives behind the corflute facades.
John: That the “Liberals” dumped their leader for being too moderate. Too, well ... , liberal, in fact. Extraordinary!John: That the “Liberals” dumped their leader for being too moderate. Too, well ... , liberal, in fact. Extraordinary!
Stephen: Having stayed at home to watch the TV coverage of Malcom Turnbull’s overthrow, upon being made aware that the unrecognisable man at Malcolm Turnbull’s side was Arthur Sinodinos, who must have struggled to Canberra, to support his friend on that dark day, emotion got the better of me and I totally lost it at that point.Stephen: Having stayed at home to watch the TV coverage of Malcom Turnbull’s overthrow, upon being made aware that the unrecognisable man at Malcolm Turnbull’s side was Arthur Sinodinos, who must have struggled to Canberra, to support his friend on that dark day, emotion got the better of me and I totally lost it at that point.
Jasper: Regardless, because of how laughable of a job these old LNP dinosaurs have been doing, its given me serious ambition to attempt a political career. So in the rare chance I end up in State or Federal Parliament in my future, thanks for initiating that.Jasper: Regardless, because of how laughable of a job these old LNP dinosaurs have been doing, its given me serious ambition to attempt a political career. So in the rare chance I end up in State or Federal Parliament in my future, thanks for initiating that.
Regarding what I will remember from 2018, it will definitely be Turnbull, Frydenberg and Morrison giving half a billion dollars to a 6-man company with serious ties to the fossil-fuel industry; considering that was the mouse that broke the camel’s back for me to jump into Australia’s politics from the deep end.Regarding what I will remember from 2018, it will definitely be Turnbull, Frydenberg and Morrison giving half a billion dollars to a 6-man company with serious ties to the fossil-fuel industry; considering that was the mouse that broke the camel’s back for me to jump into Australia’s politics from the deep end.
For those wondering how we got to this point on the Nauru bill, let’s just pop back yesterday when this was happening, as reported by Katharine Murphy.For those wondering how we got to this point on the Nauru bill, let’s just pop back yesterday when this was happening, as reported by Katharine Murphy.
Tim Storer is currently attempting to build numbers for a motion that would allow a government proposal, an amendment to the Migration Act, to come back on for debate in the chamber tonight.Tim Storer is currently attempting to build numbers for a motion that would allow a government proposal, an amendment to the Migration Act, to come back on for debate in the chamber tonight.
In the event that succeeds (and Labor would need to support it for it to succeed) there will be an attempt to insert extra amendments that would allow people to be taken off Nauru in certain conditions – so mirroring the Phelps bill with some extra conditions Labor is insisting on: that people being removed on medical advice need to have passed a character test and not be the subject of a pre-existing adverse assessment by Asio.In the event that succeeds (and Labor would need to support it for it to succeed) there will be an attempt to insert extra amendments that would allow people to be taken off Nauru in certain conditions – so mirroring the Phelps bill with some extra conditions Labor is insisting on: that people being removed on medical advice need to have passed a character test and not be the subject of a pre-existing adverse assessment by Asio.
The object of this exercise is to try to insert these new provisions in the Migration Act and get a motion of concurrence to the House of Representatives, where a simple majority is required to bring on debate in the lower house.The object of this exercise is to try to insert these new provisions in the Migration Act and get a motion of concurrence to the House of Representatives, where a simple majority is required to bring on debate in the lower house.
So the success of this plan does largely rely on when this gets through the Senate – timing is everything. It has to happen with enough time that it can get to the House and be dealt with, which would be early to mid afternoon.So the success of this plan does largely rely on when this gets through the Senate – timing is everything. It has to happen with enough time that it can get to the House and be dealt with, which would be early to mid afternoon.
Michael McCormack Michael McCormacked his way through a Sky interview this morning, where he too said the medical evacuation bill would water down the nation’s border security policies, despite the government also removing children from Nauru under medical advice.Michael McCormack Michael McCormacked his way through a Sky interview this morning, where he too said the medical evacuation bill would water down the nation’s border security policies, despite the government also removing children from Nauru under medical advice.
That’s different, apparently, because – reasons.That’s different, apparently, because – reasons.
.@Kieran_Gilbert: You still say Labor’s record is terrible, but you still haven’t resolved these outstanding cases. @M_McCormackMP: It takes a long time to resolve 50,000 people coming to Australia. MORE: https://t.co/G0O71RRTZK #FirstEdition pic.twitter.com/2j9rfwqhx7.@Kieran_Gilbert: You still say Labor’s record is terrible, but you still haven’t resolved these outstanding cases. @M_McCormackMP: It takes a long time to resolve 50,000 people coming to Australia. MORE: https://t.co/G0O71RRTZK #FirstEdition pic.twitter.com/2j9rfwqhx7
Scott Morrison started his morning on 2GB, talking to Alan Jones. Here is how the conversation on the Nauru bill played out, as transcribed by Gareth Hutchens, who took one for the team and volunteered to do it, after seeing my face this morning:Scott Morrison started his morning on 2GB, talking to Alan Jones. Here is how the conversation on the Nauru bill played out, as transcribed by Gareth Hutchens, who took one for the team and volunteered to do it, after seeing my face this morning:
Alan Jones: There’s talk of a humiliating defeat for you, and a vote is going to take place in the parliament on what I might loosely call the Phelps bill – the woman’s been there for five minutes.Alan Jones: There’s talk of a humiliating defeat for you, and a vote is going to take place in the parliament on what I might loosely call the Phelps bill – the woman’s been there for five minutes.
To put this simply, Labor and the Greens are now voting to say if you’re on Nauru or Manus Island you can come to Australia on the advice of two doctors. Is this starting up the people smuggling trade? Here is Labor opening the door. There’s a powerful political point for you.To put this simply, Labor and the Greens are now voting to say if you’re on Nauru or Manus Island you can come to Australia on the advice of two doctors. Is this starting up the people smuggling trade? Here is Labor opening the door. There’s a powerful political point for you.
Scott Morrison: Yes it is. It’s exactly what it is. I mean Labor, as we know, will always get rid of temporary protection visas. That’s something I had introduced, restored, when I was immigration minister.Scott Morrison: Yes it is. It’s exactly what it is. I mean Labor, as we know, will always get rid of temporary protection visas. That’s something I had introduced, restored, when I was immigration minister.
Remember, we had three key components of what we did to stop the boats: temporary protection visas, offshore processing, and turning back boats.Remember, we had three key components of what we did to stop the boats: temporary protection visas, offshore processing, and turning back boats.
They already said they’re not going to do temporary protection visas and, in this bill today, they will be abandoning offshore processing as we know it.They already said they’re not going to do temporary protection visas and, in this bill today, they will be abandoning offshore processing as we know it.
It is a green light, coming from Labor teaming up with the Greens, to basically completely crumble offshore processing in this country. And they’re doing it for one pathetic reason. To try to play some games in the House of Representatives. It shows a complete and total, um, lack of commitment in the need for strong border protection in this country.It is a green light, coming from Labor teaming up with the Greens, to basically completely crumble offshore processing in this country. And they’re doing it for one pathetic reason. To try to play some games in the House of Representatives. It shows a complete and total, um, lack of commitment in the need for strong border protection in this country.
They wonder why they let 50,000 people in on 800 boats. It’s because of this. They don’t believe in having stronger borders. This is an absolutely destructive and irresponsible and reckless move by the Labor party and it tells you everything you’ve always known about them and border protection. They cannot be trusted. They are weak as when it comes to border protection.They wonder why they let 50,000 people in on 800 boats. It’s because of this. They don’t believe in having stronger borders. This is an absolutely destructive and irresponsible and reckless move by the Labor party and it tells you everything you’ve always known about them and border protection. They cannot be trusted. They are weak as when it comes to border protection.
Jones: You and Tony Abbott were responsible for turning back the boats, I’m quite surprised that a party trying to win government would play to the strengths of its opponent. This is a powerful point for you.Jones: You and Tony Abbott were responsible for turning back the boats, I’m quite surprised that a party trying to win government would play to the strengths of its opponent. This is a powerful point for you.
Just for our listeners to understand simply, Labor and the Greens today will, it’s said, team up with key independents to allow refugees and asylum seekers on Nauru and Manus Island to be transferred to Australia on the advice of two doctors.Just for our listeners to understand simply, Labor and the Greens today will, it’s said, team up with key independents to allow refugees and asylum seekers on Nauru and Manus Island to be transferred to Australia on the advice of two doctors.
So the old people smuggling trade will be smiling, won’t they?So the old people smuggling trade will be smiling, won’t they?
Morrison: Oh, they’ll be smiling – and they’ll be hoping there’s more to come.Morrison: Oh, they’ll be smiling – and they’ll be hoping there’s more to come.
Jones: Will you lose this vote? Is it clear that you’ll lose the vote?Jones: Will you lose this vote? Is it clear that you’ll lose the vote?
Morrison: Not 100% clear, you know, we’re in a minority government so we’re working hard to try and defeat it.Morrison: Not 100% clear, you know, we’re in a minority government so we’re working hard to try and defeat it.
But the other thing to bear in mind in all of this is that the Labor party think they’ve got this election in the bag, and this is on this side of the election, in opposition. Imagine what they’ll be like on the other side, in government. This is a team of people who let 50,000 people on 800 boats; 1,200 people died; 6,000 children went into detention. Now they can’t kid themselves this is about getting children off Nauru. There are only 10 children on Nauru. Only 10. There are four of those children who actually don’t wish to leave.But the other thing to bear in mind in all of this is that the Labor party think they’ve got this election in the bag, and this is on this side of the election, in opposition. Imagine what they’ll be like on the other side, in government. This is a team of people who let 50,000 people on 800 boats; 1,200 people died; 6,000 children went into detention. Now they can’t kid themselves this is about getting children off Nauru. There are only 10 children on Nauru. Only 10. There are four of those children who actually don’t wish to leave.
Jones: There are 65 medical officers on Nauru, aren’t there?Jones: There are 65 medical officers on Nauru, aren’t there?
Morrison: Exactly.Morrison: Exactly.
Jones: Has Kerryn Phelps ever been to Nauru?Jones: Has Kerryn Phelps ever been to Nauru?
Morrison: Ah, not to my knowledge, no.Morrison: Ah, not to my knowledge, no.
Jones: *scoffs*Jones: *scoffs*
Morrison: And there are people voting on this bill in the Senate who we’ve offered briefings to from the security agencies and they’ve refused them.Morrison: And there are people voting on this bill in the Senate who we’ve offered briefings to from the security agencies and they’ve refused them.
Jones: Isn’t it offensive to the people of Nauru, to the Nauruans, to start telling the world that everyone who’s living there is unsafe, unhealthy and uncared for?Jones: Isn’t it offensive to the people of Nauru, to the Nauruans, to start telling the world that everyone who’s living there is unsafe, unhealthy and uncared for?
Morrison: Yes, it is terribly offensive. And it’s actually potentially racist. And this is why I’ve never understood why Australians would be so disrespectful to Nauruans. Um, so we’re not talking about kids here. What we’re talking about is single adult males, some of which won’t even be refugees, sitting over in Manus Island, you know, and we’re not talking about, you know, people you’d happily have just come and live next door.Morrison: Yes, it is terribly offensive. And it’s actually potentially racist. And this is why I’ve never understood why Australians would be so disrespectful to Nauruans. Um, so we’re not talking about kids here. What we’re talking about is single adult males, some of which won’t even be refugees, sitting over in Manus Island, you know, and we’re not talking about, you know, people you’d happily have just come and live next door.
Jones: Well, it’s the psychology of it as well, it’s the asylum seeker trade see a window now to get into Australia via the backdoor, that’s the psychology of it.Jones: Well, it’s the psychology of it as well, it’s the asylum seeker trade see a window now to get into Australia via the backdoor, that’s the psychology of it.
Morrison: Well, you look for the weakness. And the weakness is Bill Shorten. And the weakness is Bill Shorten on the economy. And the weakness is Bill Shorten on taxes. And the weakness is Bill Shorten on high electricity. I mean, Bill Shorten is the weakness.Morrison: Well, you look for the weakness. And the weakness is Bill Shorten. And the weakness is Bill Shorten on the economy. And the weakness is Bill Shorten on taxes. And the weakness is Bill Shorten on high electricity. I mean, Bill Shorten is the weakness.
Welcome to the final sitting day of 2018. It is shaping up to be an absolute doozy.Welcome to the final sitting day of 2018. It is shaping up to be an absolute doozy.
The government, for the first time in decades (at least 80 years, according to the AFR’s Phil Coorey) faces losing a legislative battle in the House.The government, for the first time in decades (at least 80 years, according to the AFR’s Phil Coorey) faces losing a legislative battle in the House.
Procedural losses happen all the time. But it’s pretty rare to lose on legislation. But that looks very possible after the crossbench, the Greens and Labor, appear to have worked out away to get a version of Kerryn Phelps’ medical evacuation bill through the parliament.Procedural losses happen all the time. But it’s pretty rare to lose on legislation. But that looks very possible after the crossbench, the Greens and Labor, appear to have worked out away to get a version of Kerryn Phelps’ medical evacuation bill through the parliament.
It looks as though they have the numbers in the Senate, and Fairfax’s David Crowe reports that the alliance may have worked out a way to attach the medical evacuations to another migration bill the government has before the House.It looks as though they have the numbers in the Senate, and Fairfax’s David Crowe reports that the alliance may have worked out a way to attach the medical evacuations to another migration bill the government has before the House.
It’s a big deal. And it is very possible it could happen.It’s a big deal. And it is very possible it could happen.
We’ll be following that, plus encryption, now that the committee report has been tabled (you can see how that played out here, from Paul Karp and Mike Bowers), plus there is always the ongoing energy battle.We’ll be following that, plus encryption, now that the committee report has been tabled (you can see how that played out here, from Paul Karp and Mike Bowers), plus there is always the ongoing energy battle.
The day has got off to a running start, and I am on my second coffee, so with Bowers and Guardian brains trust already onboard, we’re going to get straight into it.The day has got off to a running start, and I am on my second coffee, so with Bowers and Guardian brains trust already onboard, we’re going to get straight into it.
Strap in – this is going to be a bumpy 12+ hours.Strap in – this is going to be a bumpy 12+ hours.