This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crmvm2lmprjo

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Swearing ban plan misunderstood, says Thanet District Council Swearing ban plan misunderstood, says Thanet District Council
(32 minutes later)
A plan to introduce a swearing ban across Thanet has been "misunderstood", says councillors A plan to introduce a swearing ban across Thanet has been "misunderstood", say councillors
A Kent council renewing its efforts to introduce fines for people who are caught swearing in public has said its proposals have been "misunderstood".A Kent council renewing its efforts to introduce fines for people who are caught swearing in public has said its proposals have been "misunderstood".
Thanet District Council (TDC) will meet on Thursday night to discuss issuing £100 fines for anti-social behaviour and foul or abusive language if it causes distress, alarm or harassment.Thanet District Council (TDC) will meet on Thursday night to discuss issuing £100 fines for anti-social behaviour and foul or abusive language if it causes distress, alarm or harassment.
If approved, the public space protection order (PSPO) would be enforced across Thanet, including tourist hotspots Margate, Ramsgate and Broadstairs.If approved, the public space protection order (PSPO) would be enforced across Thanet, including tourist hotspots Margate, Ramsgate and Broadstairs.
Councillor Heather Keen said: "It's not about casual swearing. It's where language can upset people."Councillor Heather Keen said: "It's not about casual swearing. It's where language can upset people."
Watch: Should a Kent council fine people for swearing in public?Watch: Should a Kent council fine people for swearing in public?
A PSPO makes it an offence to refuse to stop drinking alcohol in public, leave the area or use foul and abusive language if requested by a police or council officer.A PSPO makes it an offence to refuse to stop drinking alcohol in public, leave the area or use foul and abusive language if requested by a police or council officer.
A fine of £100 can be issued.A fine of £100 can be issued.
Ms Keen added: "People should be able to visit our towns without experiencing that.Ms Keen added: "People should be able to visit our towns without experiencing that.
"So there aren't any words that people couldn't use – it's the impact those words would have on other people around them."So there aren't any words that people couldn't use – it's the impact those words would have on other people around them.
"It's a proportionate response. It's not a subjective thing, it's objective.""It's a proportionate response. It's not a subjective thing, it's objective."
The council last summer planned to enforce a PSPO, but those plans were rejected amid a threat of a legal challenge.The council last summer planned to enforce a PSPO, but those plans were rejected amid a threat of a legal challenge.
'Harassed, alarmed or distressed''Harassed, alarmed or distressed'
Free speech campaigner Connie Shaw said the existing Public Order Act 1986 (POA) already covered swearing in public – and TDC's proposal could unfairly target people.Free speech campaigner Connie Shaw said the existing Public Order Act 1986 (POA) already covered swearing in public – and TDC's proposal could unfairly target people.
"The difference with the POA and this proposal is that in the public order act there is safeguarding against someone who might accidentally offend someone to the point that they are harassed, alarmed or distressed," she said."The difference with the POA and this proposal is that in the public order act there is safeguarding against someone who might accidentally offend someone to the point that they are harassed, alarmed or distressed," she said.
"So in order to be prosecuted under the POA, there has to be intent. There isn't that safeguarding measure under the PSPO.""So in order to be prosecuted under the POA, there has to be intent. There isn't that safeguarding measure under the PSPO."
Meanwhile, Margate residents have expressed mixed views about the proposals.Meanwhile, Margate residents have expressed mixed views about the proposals.
One resident said: "If you're being abusive and come across aggressive to a person, then I support that."One resident said: "If you're being abusive and come across aggressive to a person, then I support that."
Another said: "There should be more law enforcement on the streets to enforce it rather than the council using every excuse they can to raise cash."Another said: "There should be more law enforcement on the streets to enforce it rather than the council using every excuse they can to raise cash."
Follow BBC Kent on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.Follow BBC Kent on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.