This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crmvm2lmprjo
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Swearing ban plan misunderstood, says Thanet District Council | Swearing ban plan misunderstood, says Thanet District Council |
| (about 2 hours later) | |
| The proposed ban would cover tourist hotspots Margate, Ramsgate and Broadstairs | |
| A council renewing its efforts to introduce fines for people caught swearing in public has said its proposals have been "misunderstood". | |
| Thanet District Council will meet later to discuss issuing £100 fines for anti-social behaviour and language that causes distress, alarm or harassment. | |
| If approved, the swearing ban would cover all of Thanet, including tourist hotspots Margate, Ramsgate and Broadstairs. | |
| While some people are all for the plan, others have called it "way too draconian" and an "excuse" for the council to raise cash. | |
| Watch: Should a Kent council fine people for swearing in public? | Watch: Should a Kent council fine people for swearing in public? |
| The district council is looking to bring in a public space protection order (PSPO), which makes it an offence to refuse to stop using foul and abusive language if requested to do so by a police or council officer. | |
| Councillor Heather Keen said the plans had been misunderstood. | |
| "It's not about casual swearing. It's where language can upset people," she said. | |
| "People should be able to visit our towns without experiencing that. | |
| "So there aren't any words that people couldn't use – it's the impact those words would have on other people around them. | "So there aren't any words that people couldn't use – it's the impact those words would have on other people around them. |
| "It's a proportionate response. It's not a subjective thing, it's objective." | "It's a proportionate response. It's not a subjective thing, it's objective." |
| The council last summer planned to enforce a PSPO, but that proposal was rejected amid a threat of a legal challenge. | |
| Stop drinking alcohol | |
| Free speech campaigner Connie Shaw said the existing Public Order Act 1986 (POA) already covered swearing in public – and the council's proposal could unfairly target people. | |
| "The difference with the POA and this proposal is that in the public order act there is safeguarding against someone who might accidentally offend someone to the point that they are harassed, alarmed or distressed," she said. | "The difference with the POA and this proposal is that in the public order act there is safeguarding against someone who might accidentally offend someone to the point that they are harassed, alarmed or distressed," she said. |
| "So in order to be prosecuted under the POA, there has to be intent. There isn't that safeguarding measure under the PSPO." | "So in order to be prosecuted under the POA, there has to be intent. There isn't that safeguarding measure under the PSPO." |
| Margate residents have expressed mixed views about the scheme. | |
| One said: "If you're being abusive and come across aggressive to a person, then I support that." | |
| Another said: "There should be more law enforcement on the streets to enforce it rather than the council using every excuse they can to raise cash." | Another said: "There should be more law enforcement on the streets to enforce it rather than the council using every excuse they can to raise cash." |
| Refusing to stop drinking alcohol in public or leaving the area if asked by an official is also an offence under a PSPO. A fine of £100 can be issued. | |
| Follow BBC Kent on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250. | Follow BBC Kent on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250. |