This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/uk-england-15752432

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Library closures can be challenged, judge rules Library closures were 'unlawful', says High Court judge
(about 2 hours later)
Council decisions to close libraries in Gloucestershire and Somerset can be challenged, a judge has ruled. A decision to close 21 libraries in Somerset and Gloucestershire has been reversed after a judge said it was "unlawful".
The three-day High Court hearing was brought by campaigners fighting the proposals in the two English counties. Somerset County Council wants to shut 11 libraries while Gloucestershire County Council wants to close 10.
In Somerset, 11 libraries face closure while Gloucestershire County Council wants to close 10. Judge Martin McKenna, at the High Court, said the closures did not comply with "public sector equality duties".
Judge Martin McKenna has ruled the councils acted unlawfully by not considering the impact on vulnerable people living in the two counties. Campaigners began legal action after the two councils decided to close the libraries to cut costs.
Judge McKenna has ruled the councils acted unlawfully by not considering the impact on vulnerable people living in the two counties.
In a statement, Public Interest Lawyers, which was representing the campaigners, said it was "very pleased" with the ruling.In a statement, Public Interest Lawyers, which was representing the campaigners, said it was "very pleased" with the ruling.
'Big society''Big society'
Daniel Carey, of the firm, said campaigners were worried about the impact of the cuts on minority groups.Daniel Carey, of the firm, said campaigners were worried about the impact of the cuts on minority groups.
He said they had been "pointing to the disproportionate effect that the cuts would have on disadvantaged groups such as the elderly, single mothers and the disabled".He said they had been "pointing to the disproportionate effect that the cuts would have on disadvantaged groups such as the elderly, single mothers and the disabled".
"Today's High Court ruling sends a clear message not only to Gloucestershire and Somerset, but to every council in the country that catering for the needs of the vulnerable must be at the heart of any decision to cut important services such as libraries."Today's High Court ruling sends a clear message not only to Gloucestershire and Somerset, but to every council in the country that catering for the needs of the vulnerable must be at the heart of any decision to cut important services such as libraries.
"The 'big society' cannot be relied upon to justify disenfranchising vulnerable individuals from the services on which they rely."The 'big society' cannot be relied upon to justify disenfranchising vulnerable individuals from the services on which they rely.
"I am very pleased for the thousands of residents who have supported this campaign," he added."I am very pleased for the thousands of residents who have supported this campaign," he added.
Demelza Jones, from Friends of Gloucestershire Libraries, said the group was "absolutely delighted" with the judge's ruling.Demelza Jones, from Friends of Gloucestershire Libraries, said the group was "absolutely delighted" with the judge's ruling.
"This is a real vindication for our campaign which has long said that is it unfair to remove libraries from the most disadvantaged/vulnerable members of our communities," she said."This is a real vindication for our campaign which has long said that is it unfair to remove libraries from the most disadvantaged/vulnerable members of our communities," she said.
'Icing on cake''Icing on cake'
Pete Bungard, Gloucestershire County Council's chief executive, said: "The judge found we needed to do more with regards to our responsibilities under the Equalities Act
"This is a huge disappointment as we take our duties here extremely seriously.
"With hindsight, we approached this as a transfer to the community rather than a statutory closure where a more thorough approach would have been taken."
Campaigners argued the councils had to provide a "comprehensive and efficient" library service under the 1964 Museums Act.Campaigners argued the councils had to provide a "comprehensive and efficient" library service under the 1964 Museums Act.
James Goudie QC, representing both Gloucestershire and Somerset county councils, had argued that a comprehensive service did not mean blanket coverage over a geographical area.James Goudie QC, representing both Gloucestershire and Somerset county councils, had argued that a comprehensive service did not mean blanket coverage over a geographical area.
He said that community-run libraries were "the icing on the cake" and if they were to fail then the council would still be providing a comprehensive service.He said that community-run libraries were "the icing on the cake" and if they were to fail then the council would still be providing a comprehensive service.
He also argued that libraries could not be exempt from council budget cuts.He also argued that libraries could not be exempt from council budget cuts.
He added that the councils had carried out proper consultation and assessments on how policy changes would affect the most vulnerable groups. The councils were refused permission to appeal, but they can apply directly to the Court of Appeal in a bid to take the case further.