This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/uk-england-15752432

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Library closures were 'unlawful', says High Court judge Library closures were 'unlawful', says High Court judge
(about 3 hours later)
A decision to close 21 libraries in Somerset and Gloucestershire has been reversed after a judge said it was "unlawful". A decision to close 21 libraries in Somerset and Gloucestershire has been ruled "unlawful" by a judge.
Somerset County Council wants to shut 11 libraries while Gloucestershire County Council wants to close 10. Somerset County Council wanted to withdraw funding for 11 libraries and Gloucestershire County Council wanted to stop funding 10 libraries.
Judge Martin McKenna, at the High Court, said the closures did not comply with "public sector equality duties". Judge Martin McKenna, at the High Court, said the closures did not comply with "public sector equality duties" owed to vulnerable social groups.
Campaigners began legal action after the two councils decided to close the libraries to cut costs. These include the elderly, disabled, single mothers and children.
Judge McKenna has ruled the councils acted unlawfully by not considering the impact on vulnerable people living in the two counties. The decision means the closure plans have been reversed.
In a statement, Public Interest Lawyers, which was representing the campaigners, said it was "very pleased" with the ruling.
'Big society''Big society'
Campaigners had begun legal action after the two authorities announced plans to cut costs.
In a statement, Public Interest Lawyers, which was representing the campaigners, said it was "very pleased" with the ruling.
Daniel Carey, of the firm, said campaigners were worried about the impact of the cuts on minority groups.Daniel Carey, of the firm, said campaigners were worried about the impact of the cuts on minority groups.
He said they had been "pointing to the disproportionate effect that the cuts would have on disadvantaged groups such as the elderly, single mothers and the disabled".He said they had been "pointing to the disproportionate effect that the cuts would have on disadvantaged groups such as the elderly, single mothers and the disabled".
"Today's High Court ruling sends a clear message not only to Gloucestershire and Somerset, but to every council in the country that catering for the needs of the vulnerable must be at the heart of any decision to cut important services such as libraries."Today's High Court ruling sends a clear message not only to Gloucestershire and Somerset, but to every council in the country that catering for the needs of the vulnerable must be at the heart of any decision to cut important services such as libraries.
"The 'big society' cannot be relied upon to justify disenfranchising vulnerable individuals from the services on which they rely."The 'big society' cannot be relied upon to justify disenfranchising vulnerable individuals from the services on which they rely.
"I am very pleased for the thousands of residents who have supported this campaign," he added."I am very pleased for the thousands of residents who have supported this campaign," he added.
Demelza Jones, from Friends of Gloucestershire Libraries, said the group was "absolutely delighted" with the judge's ruling.Demelza Jones, from Friends of Gloucestershire Libraries, said the group was "absolutely delighted" with the judge's ruling.
"This is a real vindication for our campaign which has long said that is it unfair to remove libraries from the most disadvantaged/vulnerable members of our communities," she said."This is a real vindication for our campaign which has long said that is it unfair to remove libraries from the most disadvantaged/vulnerable members of our communities," she said.
However the judge ruled in favour of Gloucestershire County Council on two of the three claims made against them over their duty to provide a comprehensive library service to the community.
'Icing on cake''Icing on cake'
Pete Bungard, Gloucestershire County Council's chief executive, said: "The judge found we needed to do more with regards to our responsibilities under the Equalities Act Ken Maddock, the Conservative leader of Somerset County Council, said: "We have worked with communities ever since we took the decision to reduce the libraries budget earlier this year.
"It was tremendously encouraging to see the number of people wanting to come forward and take over many of the libraries concerned.
"I am absolutely confident that in many cases libraries would not have closed... we welcome the court's agreement that our plans would still provide a comprehensive and efficient service, we also welcome the judge's comments that our consultation process met all requirements."
Pete Bungard, Gloucestershire County Council's chief executive, said: "The judge found we needed to do more with regards to our responsibilities under the Equalities Act.
"This is a huge disappointment as we take our duties here extremely seriously."This is a huge disappointment as we take our duties here extremely seriously.
"With hindsight, we approached this as a transfer to the community rather than a statutory closure where a more thorough approach would have been taken.""With hindsight, we approached this as a transfer to the community rather than a statutory closure where a more thorough approach would have been taken."
Campaigners argued the councils had to provide a "comprehensive and efficient" library service under the 1964 Museums Act.Campaigners argued the councils had to provide a "comprehensive and efficient" library service under the 1964 Museums Act.
James Goudie QC, representing both Gloucestershire and Somerset county councils, had argued that a comprehensive service did not mean blanket coverage over a geographical area.James Goudie QC, representing both Gloucestershire and Somerset county councils, had argued that a comprehensive service did not mean blanket coverage over a geographical area.
He said that community-run libraries were "the icing on the cake" and if they were to fail then the council would still be providing a comprehensive service.He said that community-run libraries were "the icing on the cake" and if they were to fail then the council would still be providing a comprehensive service.
He also argued that libraries could not be exempt from council budget cuts.He also argued that libraries could not be exempt from council budget cuts.
The councils were refused permission to appeal, but they can apply directly to the Court of Appeal in a bid to take the case further.The councils were refused permission to appeal, but they can apply directly to the Court of Appeal in a bid to take the case further.