This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-20664793

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
GCSE English results challenged in High Court GCSE English results challenged in High Court
(about 3 hours later)
By Judith Burns BBC News education reporterBy Judith Burns BBC News education reporter
An unprecedented legal challenge of last summer's GCSE English results will open at London's High Court later. An unprecedented legal challenge of last summer's GCSE English results has opened at London's High Court.
An alliance of pupils, teaching unions, schools and councils is seeking a judicial review of last-minute shifts in grade boundaries in June's exams.An alliance of pupils, teaching unions, schools and councils is seeking a judicial review of last-minute shifts in grade boundaries in June's exams.
If the court grants a judicial review, a three-day hearing will begin immediately. Secondary heads' union ASCL said it was "quietly optimistic".If the court grants a judicial review, a three-day hearing will begin immediately. Secondary heads' union ASCL said it was "quietly optimistic".
Exams regulator Ofqual is not commenting ahead of the hearing. Exams regulator Ofqual was not commenting ahead of the hearing.
The challenge calls for GCSE English exam papers taken by pupils last June to be regraded in line with grade boundaries used for the same exams in January 2012.The challenge calls for GCSE English exam papers taken by pupils last June to be regraded in line with grade boundaries used for the same exams in January 2012.
'Unprecedented margin''Unprecedented margin'
It questions decisions by exam boards AQA and Edexcel to raise the grade boundaries by an "unprecedented margin" from January 2012 to June 2012 . It also challenges the decision by the regulator Ofqual to "approve, or fail to reverse, that change".It questions decisions by exam boards AQA and Edexcel to raise the grade boundaries by an "unprecedented margin" from January 2012 to June 2012 . It also challenges the decision by the regulator Ofqual to "approve, or fail to reverse, that change".
The alliance says some 10,000 pupils consequently missed out on a C grade in GCSE English, which is a crucial benchmark used for entry into further education, vocational training and employment, but the decision affected all the grade margins.The alliance says some 10,000 pupils consequently missed out on a C grade in GCSE English, which is a crucial benchmark used for entry into further education, vocational training and employment, but the decision affected all the grade margins.
In total up to 50,000 pupils in England, Wales and Northern Ireland could receive higher grades if the judges uphold the challenge, says the alliance.In total up to 50,000 pupils in England, Wales and Northern Ireland could receive higher grades if the judges uphold the challenge, says the alliance.
Some 2,300 students who took exams set by the Welsh exam board WJEC in Wales have already been regraded on the orders of the Welsh government, which regulates exams set there.Some 2,300 students who took exams set by the Welsh exam board WJEC in Wales have already been regraded on the orders of the Welsh government, which regulates exams set there.
The case has been brought by a total of 167 individual pupils, supported by 150 schools and 42 councils, plus six professional bodies, including teaching unions.The case has been brought by a total of 167 individual pupils, supported by 150 schools and 42 councils, plus six professional bodies, including teaching unions.
They will say that between January and June 2012 it was decided that too many students were going to get a C grade or better in GCSE English, so a decision was taken to push up grade boundaries for the exams marked in June to bring down the numbers of good grades for the year as a whole.They will say that between January and June 2012 it was decided that too many students were going to get a C grade or better in GCSE English, so a decision was taken to push up grade boundaries for the exams marked in June to bring down the numbers of good grades for the year as a whole.
They argue that this amounts to a crude "statistical fix" which was unfair and against "natural justice".They argue that this amounts to a crude "statistical fix" which was unfair and against "natural justice".
"Now that we have looked at all the evidence and made final preparations for the court case, we remain certain that it is the right thing to do," said Brian Lightman of ASCL."Now that we have looked at all the evidence and made final preparations for the court case, we remain certain that it is the right thing to do," said Brian Lightman of ASCL.
"Thousands of young people in England were unfairly downgraded in June in order to compensate for mistakes made earlier in the year."Thousands of young people in England were unfairly downgraded in June in order to compensate for mistakes made earlier in the year.
'Systemic failure''Systemic failure'
"The only fair course of action for these students is to regrade the papers. While many of them will have moved on to college courses or to other options, their grades will remain with them for years to come and that is unjust.""The only fair course of action for these students is to regrade the papers. While many of them will have moved on to college courses or to other options, their grades will remain with them for years to come and that is unjust."
Mr Lightman added the fiasco was a result of a "systemic failure" in the awarding of English GCSE grades this year.Mr Lightman added the fiasco was a result of a "systemic failure" in the awarding of English GCSE grades this year.
"This is not about the rights and wrongs of modular qualifications or dumbing down of GCSEs, but about following the basic textbook principle of ensuring that assessment is reliable and fit for purpose," he said."This is not about the rights and wrongs of modular qualifications or dumbing down of GCSEs, but about following the basic textbook principle of ensuring that assessment is reliable and fit for purpose," he said.
Christine Blower, of the National Union of Teachers, said: "It is a great shame that we find ourselves in this position. The lead from the Welsh government should have been followed and the regrading of those pupils affected should have been ordered.Christine Blower, of the National Union of Teachers, said: "It is a great shame that we find ourselves in this position. The lead from the Welsh government should have been followed and the regrading of those pupils affected should have been ordered.
"Michael Gove missed the opportunity to correct this unfairness to students in England. I sincerely hope the High Court takes a different view and rectifies this injustice.""Michael Gove missed the opportunity to correct this unfairness to students in England. I sincerely hope the High Court takes a different view and rectifies this injustice."
Ofqual and the two exam boards have said they will not be commenting on the proceedings until they are over, but Ofqual has vowed to "rigorously defend" its decisions.Ofqual and the two exam boards have said they will not be commenting on the proceedings until they are over, but Ofqual has vowed to "rigorously defend" its decisions.
In its final report into the fiasco last month, Ofqual insisted the June boundaries were correct. It also suggested the grade boundaries had had to be moved in response to teachers "significantly" over-marking controlled assessment papers.In its final report into the fiasco last month, Ofqual insisted the June boundaries were correct. It also suggested the grade boundaries had had to be moved in response to teachers "significantly" over-marking controlled assessment papers.
At the time teaching unions reacted angrily to the suggestion, some arguing exam board moderators had verified and praised the marking carried out in many of the schools affected.At the time teaching unions reacted angrily to the suggestion, some arguing exam board moderators had verified and praised the marking carried out in many of the schools affected.
The court is expected to deliver its verdict before Christmas.The court is expected to deliver its verdict before Christmas.
Some 45,000 pupils resat GCSE English last month, with the results expected next week.Some 45,000 pupils resat GCSE English last month, with the results expected next week.
Are you affected by this story? If you are willing to take part in TV and radio interviews about this subject please fill in the form below.Are you affected by this story? If you are willing to take part in TV and radio interviews about this subject please fill in the form below.