This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/30/world/europe/economist-sergei-guriev-leaves-russia-abruptly.html

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Economist Leaves Russia After Questioning, Colleagues Say Economist Leaves Russia After Questioning, Colleagues Say
(about 1 hour later)
MOSCOW — A prominent and well-connected economist who has openly supported opposition figures has resigned from several posts and abruptly left Russia under mounting pressure from investigators, officials of the university he leads said on Wednesday.MOSCOW — A prominent and well-connected economist who has openly supported opposition figures has resigned from several posts and abruptly left Russia under mounting pressure from investigators, officials of the university he leads said on Wednesday.
The economist, Sergei Guriev, has been questioned repeatedly in a case that stems from a report that he co-wrote that harshly criticized the treatment of Mikhail B. Khodorkovsky, the imprisoned oil tycoon and one-time political rival to President Vladimir V. Putin. The economist, Sergei Guriev, has been questioned repeatedly in a case that stems from a report that he co-wrote that harshly criticized the treatment of Mikhail B. Khodorkovsky, the imprisoned oil tycoon and one-time political rival to President Vladimir V. Putin. Investigators contend that the report’s authors were paid by Yukos, Mr. Khodorkovsky’s company.
A centrist figure who is at home among Russia’s power brokers, Mr. Guriev drew attention a year ago for publicly declaring his support for the anti-corruption blogger Aleksei Navalny.A centrist figure who is at home among Russia’s power brokers, Mr. Guriev drew attention a year ago for publicly declaring his support for the anti-corruption blogger Aleksei Navalny.
“Am I not afraid to support an opposition politician?” he wrote at the time, adding that he and his wife had contributed a small amount to a fund to support Mr. Navalny’s anti-corruption effort. “No. I am a free person. I know that as long as I haven’t violated the law, no one can forbid me to say something or do something. Might I be misled? Of course.”“Am I not afraid to support an opposition politician?” he wrote at the time, adding that he and his wife had contributed a small amount to a fund to support Mr. Navalny’s anti-corruption effort. “No. I am a free person. I know that as long as I haven’t violated the law, no one can forbid me to say something or do something. Might I be misled? Of course.”
Mr. Guriev declined to comment on the reasons for his departure on Wednesday, and has said he left for a vacation in France, where his wife and children live. However, two close associates said he had left because he was unsettled by intensifying interest from investigators.Mr. Guriev declined to comment on the reasons for his departure on Wednesday, and has said he left for a vacation in France, where his wife and children live. However, two close associates said he had left because he was unsettled by intensifying interest from investigators.
“He had reason to believe he could be deprived of his freedom,” and possibly prevented from leaving Russia, said one friend, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak about the case.“He had reason to believe he could be deprived of his freedom,” and possibly prevented from leaving Russia, said one friend, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak about the case.
“He had visits from people. After those visits, he asked a number of influential people in Moscow who normally would protect him, and he was given advice that he was not safe,” the friend said. “He left in a hurry. We’re talking about a few days.”“He had visits from people. After those visits, he asked a number of influential people in Moscow who normally would protect him, and he was given advice that he was not safe,” the friend said. “He left in a hurry. We’re talking about a few days.”
Mr. Guriev this week declined to seek re-election to the board of directors at Sberbank, the state-run consumer banking giant. At the New Economic School, where Mr. Guriev has been rector for a decade, officials said they were searching for his successor.
Dmitri S. Peskov, a spokesman for Mr. Putin, said that as far as he knew, Mr. Guriev had simply left Russia on vacation, and that he could not comment on the investigation.Dmitri S. Peskov, a spokesman for Mr. Putin, said that as far as he knew, Mr. Guriev had simply left Russia on vacation, and that he could not comment on the investigation.
“This is not our question — this has nothing to do with the Kremlin, nothing to do with the president,” he said. “The only thing I can tell you is that this is pure speculation. I have found only his words saying he had personal reasons to resign, and he has not left Moscow.”“This is not our question — this has nothing to do with the Kremlin, nothing to do with the president,” he said. “The only thing I can tell you is that this is pure speculation. I have found only his words saying he had personal reasons to resign, and he has not left Moscow.”
However, if Mr. Guriev has left Russia because of a politically tinged prosecution, it is likely to make waves both in Russia and the West, because he is so well known. When President Obama visited Russia in 2009, he delivered an address at the New Economic School, where Mr. Guriev has served as rector for 10 years. Mr. Guriev wrote speeches for Mr. Medvedev when he was president, and was seen as closely affiliated with his government. However, if Mr. Guriev has left Russia because of a politically tinged prosecution, it is likely to make waves both in Russia and the West, because he is so well known. When President Obama visited Russia in 2009, he delivered an address at the New Economic School. Mr. Guriev wrote speeches for Mr. Medvedev when he was president, and was seen as closely affiliated with his government.
Aleksei V. Makarkin, an analyst at Moscow’s Center for Political Technologies, said the pressure on Mr. Guriev shows that law enforcement organs are increasingly confident in their moves against supporters of the political opposition, even if it comes at the cost of international prestige.Aleksei V. Makarkin, an analyst at Moscow’s Center for Political Technologies, said the pressure on Mr. Guriev shows that law enforcement organs are increasingly confident in their moves against supporters of the political opposition, even if it comes at the cost of international prestige.
He noted investigators’ recent scrutiny into whether Skolkovo, the government-financed innovation hub pioneered by Prime Minister Dmitri A. Medvedev, had funneled money to opposition politicians.He noted investigators’ recent scrutiny into whether Skolkovo, the government-financed innovation hub pioneered by Prime Minister Dmitri A. Medvedev, had funneled money to opposition politicians.
“Probably the siloviki have gotten carte blanche to carry out actions on people regardless of their standing,” he said, referring to the investigators. “There was some kind of an informal manifesto which does not exist now.”“Probably the siloviki have gotten carte blanche to carry out actions on people regardless of their standing,” he said, referring to the investigators. “There was some kind of an informal manifesto which does not exist now.”
Mr. Guriev is one of a panel of experts who agreed to co-write a highly critical 2011 report on the Khodorkovsky verdict under the auspices of Mr. Medvedev’s human rights council. After Mr. Putin became president last spring, investigators opened an inquiry into whether Mr. Khodorkovsky had secretly paid the report’s authors.Mr. Guriev is one of a panel of experts who agreed to co-write a highly critical 2011 report on the Khodorkovsky verdict under the auspices of Mr. Medvedev’s human rights council. After Mr. Putin became president last spring, investigators opened an inquiry into whether Mr. Khodorkovsky had secretly paid the report’s authors.
Another of the authors, Mikhail Subbotin, who heads the Center for Legal and Economic Research, said investigators had carried out numerous searches of the homes of his organization’s founders and co-workers, going so far as to search the home of one woman’s husband in Kazakhstan. He said they were searching for evidence that Yukos, the giant oil company Mr. Khodorkovsky headed, had given money to the organization in 2003, eight years before the report was published.Another of the authors, Mikhail Subbotin, who heads the Center for Legal and Economic Research, said investigators had carried out numerous searches of the homes of his organization’s founders and co-workers, going so far as to search the home of one woman’s husband in Kazakhstan. He said they were searching for evidence that Yukos, the giant oil company Mr. Khodorkovsky headed, had given money to the organization in 2003, eight years before the report was published.
“Unfortunately, the system works in such a way that it cannot go into reverse,” he said. “If something doesn’t work out, then the system has to push forward, to be more active and more aggressive, and put on even stronger pressure. And that’s what is going on right now.”“Unfortunately, the system works in such a way that it cannot go into reverse,” he said. “If something doesn’t work out, then the system has to push forward, to be more active and more aggressive, and put on even stronger pressure. And that’s what is going on right now.”
Mr. Guriev’s abrupt departure from Russia was the subject of furious discussion on social networking sites on Wednesday. A pro-Kremlin analyst, Sergei A. Markov, wrote that liberal-leaning institutions like the New Economic School and Skolkovo had been used to funnel money from “oligarchic groupings” to opposition demonstrators.Mr. Guriev’s abrupt departure from Russia was the subject of furious discussion on social networking sites on Wednesday. A pro-Kremlin analyst, Sergei A. Markov, wrote that liberal-leaning institutions like the New Economic School and Skolkovo had been used to funnel money from “oligarchic groupings” to opposition demonstrators.
“The sudden departure of Guriev is connected to the attempt to keep out of the hands of investigators these secret channels, through which oligarchic and federal budgetary funds went to support the revolutionary anti-Putin opposition,” Mr. Markov said. “The goal was, of course, not direct revolution, but for Putin to give up his intentions to return for a third term.”“The sudden departure of Guriev is connected to the attempt to keep out of the hands of investigators these secret channels, through which oligarchic and federal budgetary funds went to support the revolutionary anti-Putin opposition,” Mr. Markov said. “The goal was, of course, not direct revolution, but for Putin to give up his intentions to return for a third term.”
But many observers said they were chilled by the news that even someone of Mr. Guriev’s stature could be targeted. Nikolai Petrov, a political analyst at the Carnegie Moscow Center, said the balance between liberals and hard-liners in Mr. Putin’s government is “changing rapidly, and not in favor of liberals.” He said Mr. Guriev was one of the few people in Moscow who could straddle the worlds of officialdom and opposition activists. But many observers said they were chilled by the news that even someone of Mr. Guriev’s stature could be targeted. Nikolai Petrov, a political analyst at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow, said the balance between liberals and hard-liners in Mr. Putin’s government is “changing rapidly, and not in favor of liberals.” He said Mr. Guriev was one of the few people in Moscow who could straddle the worlds of officialdom and opposition activists.
“The conflict between Putin and his regime and the most active part of society is widening,” he said. “Guriev is one of the few people who was well-accepted by both side for a while. The fact that he is out means the regime is losing the support of the intelligentsia.”“The conflict between Putin and his regime and the most active part of society is widening,” he said. “Guriev is one of the few people who was well-accepted by both side for a while. The fact that he is out means the regime is losing the support of the intelligentsia.”
Erik Berglof, chairman of the New Economic School’s international advisory board, said that the board has begun a search for Mr. Guriev’s successor. He called his departure “a big blow for the country.” Erik Berglof, chairman of the New Economic School’s international advisory board, called Mr. Guriev’s departure “a big blow for the country.”
Though Mr. Guriev’s wife, also a leading economist, moved to France some time ago, he remained, and poured energy into convincing Rrussian economists to return after receiving their doctorates, he said.Though Mr. Guriev’s wife, also a leading economist, moved to France some time ago, he remained, and poured energy into convincing Rrussian economists to return after receiving their doctorates, he said.
“He was certainly someone who believed that russia could change,” said Mr. Berglof, who is chief economist at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. “He will be greatly missed, but the school existed before Sergei joined and will also continue to develop after he has left.”“He was certainly someone who believed that russia could change,” said Mr. Berglof, who is chief economist at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. “He will be greatly missed, but the school existed before Sergei joined and will also continue to develop after he has left.”
Barry Ickes, a member of the university’s board of directors, said he was headed to Moscow on Wednesday to help manage the transition. Mr. Ickes said that Mr. Guriev had long been weighing the decision of whether to step down because of the investigation. “It came to a point where he had to make a decision, because he was in limbo,” he said.Barry Ickes, a member of the university’s board of directors, said he was headed to Moscow on Wednesday to help manage the transition. Mr. Ickes said that Mr. Guriev had long been weighing the decision of whether to step down because of the investigation. “It came to a point where he had to make a decision, because he was in limbo,” he said.
“Sergei was a great rector, he did a great job for the school,” Mr. Ickes said. “It’s sad that he is leaving under these sudden circumstances.”“Sergei was a great rector, he did a great job for the school,” Mr. Ickes said. “It’s sad that he is leaving under these sudden circumstances.”

Reporting contributed by Andrew Roth.

Reporting contributed by Andrew Roth.