This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/24/world/europe/member-of-russian-punk-band-freed-under-amnesty-law.html

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 6 Version 7
2 Members of Pussy Riot Freed Under Amnesty Law Released Punk Rockers Keep Up Criticism of Putin
(about 11 hours later)
MOSCOW — Two women from the punk group Pussy Riot serving two-year prison terms for staging a protest performance against President Vladimir V. Putin in Moscow’s main cathedral were released on Monday under a new amnesty law. MOSCOW — Two women from the punk group Pussy Riot who were nearing the end of two-year prison terms for staging a protest performance against Vladimir V. Putin in Moscow’s main cathedral were released on Monday under a new amnesty law.
The case of Maria Alyokhina, who was set free from a prison in the western city of Nizhny Novgorod on Monday morning, and her co-defendant, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, who was released later in the day in the Siberian city of Krasnoyarsk, had drawn international condemnation of Russia’s human rights record. Critics said their prosecution and relatively stiff sentences represented a brutal repression of free speech. Unbowed, they immediately seized on their sudden freedom to slam Mr. Putin, accusing him of using the Russian justice system to bolster his image before the Winter Olympics to be held in Sochi in February, and insisting they did not want his mercy.
In a telephone interview on Monday, Ms. Alyokhina said that she did not want amnesty, and that officials had forced her to leave the prison. She said that the amnesty program was designed to make Mr. Putin look benevolent, and that she would have preferred to serve the remainder of her sentence. The case of Maria Alyokhina, who was set free from a prison in the western city of Nizhny Novgorod on Monday morning, and her co-defendant, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, who was released later in the day in the Siberian city of Krasnoyarsk, had drawn widespread condemnation of Russia for suppressing political speech, and made the punk group’s members an international sensation as famous musicians and artists spoke out in their defense.
“I think this is an attempt to improve the image of the current government, a little, before the Sochi Olympics — particularly for the Western Europeans,” she said, referring to the Winter Games Russia is hosting in February. “But I don’t consider this humane or merciful.” The release of the two women came three days after Mr. Putin granted clemency to Russia’s most famous prisoner, Mikhail B. Khodorkovsky, the former oil tycoon, who was removed from a penal colony in northern Russia and flown to Berlin.
She added, “This is a lie.” The amnesty law and the Khodorkovsky pardon are widely viewed here as an effort by Mr. Putin to eliminate opportunities for criticism of Russia during the Olympics. Already, there has been much criticism in the West of Russia over a law viewed as suppressing gay rights, and there was little doubt that Western governments and rights groups would have used the Games as an opportunity to draw attention to the plight of high-profile prisoners.
“We didn’t ask for any pardon,” Ms. Alyokhina said. “I would have sat here until the end of my sentence because I don’t need mercy from Putin.” The women had been jailed since March 2012 and would have been released within the next three months. Mr. Putin has asserted that the amnesty law is an effort to make the criminal justice system more humane and that Mr. Khodorkovsky was similarly released on humanitarian grounds because his mother is ill. Critics, however, have said the releases simply underscore the arbitrariness of the Russian justice system, and Mr. Putin’s singular authority not just over the Kremlin but over Parliament and the courts as well.
On Thursday, hours after the adoption of the amnesty law, Mr. Putin said that he would also grant clemency to Russia’s most famous prisoner, Mikhail B. Khodorkovsky, the former Yukos oil tycoon. Mr. Khodorkovsky was released from a penal colony later that night and flown to Berlin, where he held a news conference on Sunday. Ms. Tolokonnikova, who has been the most outspoken of the Pussy Riot defendants, said she regarded the amnesty to be as illegitimate as her arrest and conviction. “They put me in; they let me out,” she said in an interview on the radio station Echo of Moscow. “One thing was funny and the other no less funny.”
While Mr. Putin has described the amnesty law and Mr. Khodorkovsky’s pardon as efforts to make the Russian criminal justice system more humane, it has also underscored his singular authority in this country and, to critics, the very arbitrariness of the Russian legal process that rights groups have long denounced. She said it was obvious the amnesty was tied to the Olympics and called it “ridiculous,” given how close it came to the end of her sentence. Although convicted in August 2012, the women had been jailed since the previous March.
The two women were convicted, along with a third woman, Yekaterina Samutsevich, whose sentence was later overturned on appeal, of hooliganism motivated by religious hatred. The women had insisted repeatedly that they were motivated not by antireligious sentiment but by opposition to Mr. Putin and to Russia’s political system. “We could easily stay there till the end of the term without this humoristic gesture of our authorities,” she said.
They said they had chosen the church, the Cathedral of Christ the Savior, for their “punk prayer” to criticize the political support for Mr. Putin and the Kremlin shown by the patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church, Kirill 1. In a telephone interview on Monday, Ms. Alyokhina similarly said that she did not want amnesty, and that officials had forced her to leave the prison. She said she would have preferred to serve out her sentence.
The Russian Parliament, at Mr. Putin’s direction, passed the sweeping amnesty law last week, and the legislation was also expected to bring the release of the Greenpeace activists recently arrested while protesting oil exploration in the Arctic. “I think this is an attempt to improve the image of the current government, a little, before the Sochi Olympics — particularly for the Western Europeans,” she said. “But I don’t consider this humane or merciful.”
Others who stand to benefit from the law include defendants accused of crimes in connection with an antigovernment protest that turned violent after Mr. Putin’s re-election as president. She added, “We didn’t ask for any pardon.”
The members of Pussy Riot, the Greenpeace activists and Mr. Khodorkovsky had all become international symbols for critics of the Russian system, and could well have been the subject of protests and demonstrations during the Winter Olympics, which will be held in the southern Russian city of Sochi. The two women were convicted of hooliganism motivated by religious hatred, along with a third woman, Yekaterina Samutsevich, whose sentence was later suspended on appeal. The women had insisted that they were motivated not by antireligious sentiment but by opposition to Mr. Putin and to Russia’s political system.
It is not clear, however, whether Mr. Putin was motivated by the Olympics or some other factors. As he prepares to enter his 15th year as Russia’s pre-eminent political figure, he seems increasingly confident and in control, though he may soon face serious challenges as a result of the country’s slowing economy. The pattern of high-profile defendants being the first to benefit from the new amnesty law seemed to support Ms. Alyokhina’s assertion of a public relations campaign on the part of the Kremlin. The amnesty law was also expected to bring about the release of the Greenpeace activists recently arrested while protesting oil exploration in the Arctic.
Mark G. Denisov, who works for the Public Supervisory Commission in Krasnoyarsk, which is responsible for monitoring prison conditions and prisoners’ rights, said he expected that about 1,000 convicts would ultimately be released under the amnesty program out of some 23,000 held in jails in the region. But he said that the process was slow and that so far he was not aware of anyone going free other than Ms. Tolokonnikova. A pattern of high-profile defendants being the first to benefit from the new amnesty law seemed to support the assertion of a public-relations campaign on the part of the Kremlin.
Anticipation of the release of Ms. Tolokonnikova, the best known of the Pussy Riot protesters, had been building since last week, when it became clear that the amnesty law approved by Parliament would cut short her sentence. Mark G. Denisov, who works for the Public Supervisory Commission in Krasnoyarsk, which is responsible for monitoring prison conditions and prisoners’ rights, said he expected that about 1,000 convicts would ultimately be released under the amnesty program out of about 23,000 held in jails in the region. But he said that the process was slow and that so far he was not aware of anyone going free other than Ms. Tolokonnikova.
Ms. Tolokonnikova’s transfer to Siberia in November was not seen as an effort to punish her further. Instead, it brought her closer to her grandmother who lives in Krasnoyarsk, where Ms. Tolokonnikova spent many summers as a child. In November, she was transferred to Krasnoyarsk, which brought her closer to her grandmother who lives in the city, and where Ms. Tolokonnikova spent many summers as a child. More than 2,600 miles from Moscow, Krasnoyarsk has often been a destination of exile for political opponents by Russia’s rulers, and under Stalin, the city became a major hub in the gulag system.
For a little more than a month, she had been held in a prison hospital on the edge of the city, where her husband, Pyotr Verzilov, and a handful of journalists arrived last week and waited for news outside the prison gates in freezing temperatures.
More than 2,600 miles from Moscow, Krasnoyarsk is a place to which Russia’s rulers have often banished political opponents, ever since the Decembrist rebellion in the 19th century, when elites demanding a constitution from the czar were sent there.
Under Stalin, the city became a major hub in the gulag system; today there are seven prisons within the city limits. Heavy Soviet-era prison trucks regularly rumble through the streets, past the gingerbread wooden cottages that dot the landscape of former factories, many built by prisoners.
A sign on the front of the prison that held Ms. Tolokonnikova seeks to set the current correctional system apart from this history. It says, “Today the criminal penitentiary system is not a gulag — it’s a center of socio-psychological help for convicts and a system of transitional technology.”A sign on the front of the prison that held Ms. Tolokonnikova seeks to set the current correctional system apart from this history. It says, “Today the criminal penitentiary system is not a gulag — it’s a center of socio-psychological help for convicts and a system of transitional technology.”
Ms. Tolokonnikova’s official home address is in Krasnoyarsk, where she often lived in the summers with her paternal grandmother, Vera I. Tolokonnikova, in a typical run-down Soviet apartment bloc. The apartment is less than a half-mile from the prison hospital, and family members indicated that she would stay with her grandmother for a while after her release.

Andrew E. Kramer contributed reporting from Moscow, and Patrick Reevell from Krasnoyarsk, Russia.

Andrew E. Kramer contributed reported from in Moscow, and Patrick Reevell from Krasnoyarsk, Russia.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: December 23, 2013Correction: December 23, 2013

An earlier version of this article misstated the date of the Decembrist rebellion. It took place in the 19th century, not the 18th century.

An earlier version of this article misstated the date of the Decembrist rebellion. It took place in the 19th century, not the 18th century.