This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33814819

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Lord Janner abuse proceedings to start in court Lord Janner told he must attend court hearing
(about 9 hours later)
Criminal proceedings against Lord Janner over allegations of child sexual abuse in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s are to begin later. Lord Janner must appear at court in person for a hearing over child sex abuse charges, Westminster Magistrates' Court has ruled.
The Westminster Magistrates' Court case comes after a review overturned a Crown Prosecution Service decision not to bring charges because of his dementia. The former Labour peer, 87, who has dementia, denies allegations of abuse in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s.
Lord Janner is likely to be sent to the Crown Court, which will decide whether he is fit to plead and face a trial. He did not attend court on Friday as lawyers said he was "unfit" to appear.
The 87-year-old denies any wrongdoing and his family says he is innocent. But the chief magistrate ruled that although Lord Janner did not have to play a part in the hearing, he was legally required to attend.
In April, Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders decided it was not in the public interest for Lord Janner - who as Greville Janner was an MP for 27 years - to face a criminal trial on 22 allegations of historical sexual abuse against nine children, because of his severe form of dementia. Andrew Smith QC, defending, called two medical witnesses to give evidence that Lord Janner would suffer "catastrophic distress" if he was made to attend court.
'Law requires'
Chief Magistrate Howard Riddle said he understood Lord Janner "may well become intolerant of the process, irritable and may indeed leave".
He added: "I further understand, and this is very significant, it is likely to have no long-term effect on him.
"He must appear for a comparatively short period of time. He is free to go if he becomes distressed.
"This will probably be achieved in less than a minute. Nevertheless the law requires his presence."
The case is likely to be sent to a crown court, which will decide whether Lord Janner is fit to face a trial.
It comes after a Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) decision not to bring charges because of his health was overturned.
In April, Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders decided it was not in the public interest for Lord Janner - who as Greville Janner was an MP for 27 years - to be tried on 22 allegations of historical sexual abuse against nine children, because of his severe form of dementia.
However, six of the alleged victims asked an independent QC to examine her ruling under the CPS's Victims' Right to Review scheme.However, six of the alleged victims asked an independent QC to examine her ruling under the CPS's Victims' Right to Review scheme.
If a Crown Court judge decides the former Labour MP for Leicester is fit to plead, a full trial may take place. If not, there will be a so-called trial of the facts, where a jury will decide only if he committed the physical acts of abuse, with no finding of guilt and no conviction. David Perry QC concluded that it was in the public interest to bring proceedings before a criminal court.
If a crown court judge decides the former Labour MP for Leicester is fit to plead, a full trial may take place.
If not, there will be a so-called trial of the facts, where a jury will decide only if he committed the physical acts of abuse, with no finding of guilt and no conviction.
AnalysisAnalysis
By Clive Coleman, legal correspondentBy Clive Coleman, legal correspondent
Whether Lord Janner is fit to plead - to take part in a full criminal trial - will be decided by a crown court judge. He will consider the medical evidence. Whether Lord Janner is fit to plead - to take part in a full criminal trial - will be decided by a crown court judge. He will consider the medical evidence.
If he is not deemed fit he will face what is known as a trial of the facts. There will be no examination of the mental elements of the crime, no finding of guilt and no conviction.If he is not deemed fit he will face what is known as a trial of the facts. There will be no examination of the mental elements of the crime, no finding of guilt and no conviction.
It is a relatively rare procedure normally used not in cases where a defendant is said to suffer from dementia, but where they pose a danger and need to be hospitalised for the safety of themselves and others.It is a relatively rare procedure normally used not in cases where a defendant is said to suffer from dementia, but where they pose a danger and need to be hospitalised for the safety of themselves and others.
The court cannot impose a hospitalisation or supervision order unless a jury has found the defendant performed the physical act of the crime.The court cannot impose a hospitalisation or supervision order unless a jury has found the defendant performed the physical act of the crime.
However, Lord Janner can only be sent to face the fitness to plead process and trial of the facts in the Crown Court, if he attends the magistrates court, or his lawyers have instructions to consent on his behalf. However, Lord Janner can only be sent to face the fitness to plead process and trial of the facts in the crown court, if he attends the magistrates court, or his lawyers have instructions to consent on his behalf.
If they do not, the prosecution may have to make a little used application to a High Court judge for something called a voluntary bill of indictment. This has the effect of by-passing the magistrates court and delivering the defendant direct to the Crown Court. If they do not, the prosecution may have to make a little used application to a High Court judge for something called a voluntary bill of indictment. This has the effect of by-passing the magistrates court and delivering the defendant direct to the crown court.
Janner case spotlights legal optionsJanner case spotlights legal options