This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33814819

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Lord Janner told he must attend court hearing Lord Janner told to attend court over child abuse charges
(34 minutes later)
Lord Janner must appear at court in person for a hearing over child sex abuse charges, Westminster Magistrates' Court has ruled.Lord Janner must appear at court in person for a hearing over child sex abuse charges, Westminster Magistrates' Court has ruled.
The former Labour peer, 87, who has dementia, denies allegations of abuse in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s.The former Labour peer, 87, who has dementia, denies allegations of abuse in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s.
He did not attend court on Friday as lawyers said he was "unfit" to appear.He did not attend court on Friday as lawyers said he was "unfit" to appear.
But the chief magistrate ruled that although Lord Janner did not have to play a part in the hearing, he was legally required to attend.But the chief magistrate ruled that although Lord Janner did not have to play a part in the hearing, he was legally required to attend.
Andrew Smith QC, defending, called two medical witnesses to give evidence that Lord Janner would suffer "catastrophic distress" if he was made to attend court. Andrew Smith QC, defending, called two medical witnesses to give evidence that the former MP would suffer "catastrophic distress" if he was made to attend court.
'Law requires''Law requires'
Chief Magistrate Howard Riddle said he understood Lord Janner "may well become intolerant of the process, irritable and may indeed leave".Chief Magistrate Howard Riddle said he understood Lord Janner "may well become intolerant of the process, irritable and may indeed leave".
He added: "I further understand, and this is very significant, it is likely to have no long-term effect on him.He added: "I further understand, and this is very significant, it is likely to have no long-term effect on him.
"He must appear for a comparatively short period of time. He is free to go if he becomes distressed."He must appear for a comparatively short period of time. He is free to go if he becomes distressed.
"This will probably be achieved in less than a minute. Nevertheless the law requires his presence.""This will probably be achieved in less than a minute. Nevertheless the law requires his presence."
The case is likely to be sent to a crown court, which will decide whether Lord Janner is fit to face a trial.The case is likely to be sent to a crown court, which will decide whether Lord Janner is fit to face a trial.
It comes after a Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) decision not to bring charges because of his health was overturned. Earlier this year, Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders decided not to bring charges because of Lord Janner's health - but this decision was overturned after an appeal by the alleged victims.
In April, Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders decided it was not in the public interest for Lord Janner - who as Greville Janner was an MP for 27 years - to be tried on 22 allegations of historical sexual abuse against nine children, because of his severe form of dementia.
However, six of the alleged victims asked an independent QC to examine her ruling under the CPS's Victims' Right to Review scheme.
David Perry QC concluded that it was in the public interest to bring proceedings before a criminal court.
If a crown court judge decides the former Labour MP for Leicester is fit to plead, a full trial may take place.If a crown court judge decides the former Labour MP for Leicester is fit to plead, a full trial may take place.
If not, there will be a so-called trial of the facts, where a jury will decide only if he committed the physical acts of abuse, with no finding of guilt and no conviction.If not, there will be a so-called trial of the facts, where a jury will decide only if he committed the physical acts of abuse, with no finding of guilt and no conviction.
AnalysisAnalysis
By Clive Coleman, legal correspondentBy Clive Coleman, legal correspondent
Whether Lord Janner is fit to plead - to take part in a full criminal trial - will be decided by a crown court judge. He will consider the medical evidence.Whether Lord Janner is fit to plead - to take part in a full criminal trial - will be decided by a crown court judge. He will consider the medical evidence.
If he is not deemed fit he will face what is known as a trial of the facts. There will be no examination of the mental elements of the crime, no finding of guilt and no conviction.If he is not deemed fit he will face what is known as a trial of the facts. There will be no examination of the mental elements of the crime, no finding of guilt and no conviction.
It is a relatively rare procedure normally used not in cases where a defendant is said to suffer from dementia, but where they pose a danger and need to be hospitalised for the safety of themselves and others.It is a relatively rare procedure normally used not in cases where a defendant is said to suffer from dementia, but where they pose a danger and need to be hospitalised for the safety of themselves and others.
The court cannot impose a hospitalisation or supervision order unless a jury has found the defendant performed the physical act of the crime.The court cannot impose a hospitalisation or supervision order unless a jury has found the defendant performed the physical act of the crime.
However, Lord Janner can only be sent to face the fitness to plead process and trial of the facts in the crown court, if he attends the magistrates court, or his lawyers have instructions to consent on his behalf.However, Lord Janner can only be sent to face the fitness to plead process and trial of the facts in the crown court, if he attends the magistrates court, or his lawyers have instructions to consent on his behalf.
If they do not, the prosecution may have to make a little used application to a High Court judge for something called a voluntary bill of indictment. This has the effect of by-passing the magistrates court and delivering the defendant direct to the crown court.If they do not, the prosecution may have to make a little used application to a High Court judge for something called a voluntary bill of indictment. This has the effect of by-passing the magistrates court and delivering the defendant direct to the crown court.
Janner case spotlights legal optionsJanner case spotlights legal options