This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/live/2016/jun/01/eu-debate-the-most-abusive-political-campaign-ever-in-britain-live

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
EU debate: the most abusive political campaign ever in Britain? – live EU debate: the most abusive political campaign ever in Britain?
(35 minutes later)
2.07pm BST
14:07
Sarah Marsh
Thanks everyone, that was a really insightful and worthwhile discussion. Really pleased to see such great comments below the line (as James says putting them politicians to shame).
We will be back next week with another debate – if you’ve got any comments/ suggestions/ideas etc then drop me an email on sarah.marsh@theguardian.com or tweet @guardianopinion.
Cheers everyone - happy Wednesday!
1.58pm BST
13:58
James Walsh
We’ll be wrapping up comments in a few minutes - thanks for all the contributions over the past two hours. Loads of great argument below the line, and you’ve been quite polite, too, putting those politicians to shame.
Here are a couple of contrasting views, taking in Cameron’s “shrill denunciations”, bombast, and the potential for a post-Brexit geographical schism.
By and large, I haven't found this a nasty campaign at all. I haven't been especially impressed by Mr Cameron's increasingly shrill denunciations, or some of Boris's faux-pas, but by and large it's been fairly civil, and I've been discussing it with friends and colleagues on either side (or no side) without rancour. I'm not at all surprised the Guardian is citing the Scottish one as more positive of course (Scottish secession good, British secession , bad, nationalism etc). But that campaign struck me as very nasty indeed. I've certainly heard no tales of Remain window posters having their windows smashed, for example.
This referendum campaign is not only the nastiest, it is also the most bombastic and divisive I can ever remember. Whatever the outcome, on June 24th about half of the country will be angry and dispirited. There will also likely be a geographical schism - with London, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales voting for Remain and the rest of the country for Brexit. Now that the genie is out of the bottle, how will it be put back? If Brexit wins, how will the border between Ireland and Northern Ireland be managed? What if Scotland votes 'in' and then holds a second referendum to leave the union? Does anyone fancy passing through immigration and customs on the Engish-Scottish border?
Updated
at 1.59pm BST
1.46pm BST
13:46
Within the Tory party the political and personal have become deeply enmeshed
Rafael Behr
Passions are bound to run high when a question of national destiny is being decided, but the gravity of the issue doesn’t explain why levels of personal acrimony in the EU referendum campaign seem so high. Is it all that much more vicious than any other campaign? Last year’s general election was hardly a genteel affair. Neither was this May’s London mayoral race. Politics can be a nasty business.
But an addition quotient of vitriol flows from the origins of this referendum in deep, old schisms within the Conservative party. Civil wars in politics tend to be more vicious and personal than contests along party lines because they involve more atavistic emotions – chiefly betrayal. Tories expect Labour MPs to disagree with them and vice-versa. In that arena, it is possible – often, but not always – to separate political combat from personal hatred. But when someone from your own party, someone whom you considered a colleague, an ally, sides against you, the wound is deeper.
There are Tory MPs who have always despised David Cameron. They believe (not without cause) that he has surrounded himself with a gilded elite and treats rank and file Conservatives much the way an imperial cavalry officer might view grimy infantry conscripts. They long suspected him of harbouring Europhiliac tendencies but went along with the pretence of his EU membership “renegotiation.” Some appear to have operated under the delusion that Cameron might not throw the full authority of his prime ministerial office at the job of winning the referendum for Remain. They seem genuinely aggrieved that he is even trying.
And, of course, in Boris Johnson they have a figurehead whose ambition to one day lead the party gives him every incentive to see Cameron’s personal brand irrevocably tarnished, regardless of the result. Within the Tory party the political and personal have become deeply enmeshed. The task of advancing a particular message has become indistinguishable from the job of discrediting the other side’s messengers. In that climate it is hardly surprising that the fight looks and sounds dirty.
1.41pm BST
13:41
James Walsh
To counter the (often warranted) criticism of campaigners on both sides, we asked commenters if any politicians have impressed them during the referendum campaign.
Any suggestions, do post them below the line. One reader has suggested Alex Salmond:
Alex Salmond has impressed me from the Remain side. He's actually trying to make a positive case
Meanwhile LyntonCrosby (presumably not that Lynton Crosby) thinks Liam Fox has done a good job.
I hate to say it but Liam Fox has managed to keep his head.
Boris Johnson is just a disgraceful liar who will do anything to get within stabbing range of David Cameron.
Updated
at 1.47pm BST
1.37pm BST1.37pm BST
13:3713:37
Sarah MarshSarah Marsh
Strong points backing Corbyn here ... anyone want to respond to this below the line?Strong points backing Corbyn here ... anyone want to respond to this below the line?
Jeremy Corbyn is the politician who has most singularly let himself down mostJeremy Corbyn is the politician who has most singularly let himself down most
In that case you have had a very limited exposure to the campaign.In that case you have had a very limited exposure to the campaign.
We've had Cameron suggesting that war could break out, that a severe economic recession will inevitably follow and on the other side a lot of ugly dog-whistle politics carefully coded as "concern" about immigration. The outers have no shame in trumpeting the £3350m a week cost of the EU although it's been shot down numerous times and have blatantly lied that the EU would over-rule the veto and allow Turkey to join the EU by 2020.We've had Cameron suggesting that war could break out, that a severe economic recession will inevitably follow and on the other side a lot of ugly dog-whistle politics carefully coded as "concern" about immigration. The outers have no shame in trumpeting the £3350m a week cost of the EU although it's been shot down numerous times and have blatantly lied that the EU would over-rule the veto and allow Turkey to join the EU by 2020.
Corbyn has made a high-profile speech backing the case for Remain, but perhaps he remembers the damage that resulted in Labour backing the "Better Together" campaign in Scotland, that left Labour with one MP in what had traditionally been a Labour stronghold. Also it's become clear that this referendum has become a Tory leadership contest with the likelihood of the Tory party splitting and at the very least exposing a serious rift in the Tory party. Why do the same with his own party?Corbyn has made a high-profile speech backing the case for Remain, but perhaps he remembers the damage that resulted in Labour backing the "Better Together" campaign in Scotland, that left Labour with one MP in what had traditionally been a Labour stronghold. Also it's become clear that this referendum has become a Tory leadership contest with the likelihood of the Tory party splitting and at the very least exposing a serious rift in the Tory party. Why do the same with his own party?
Anyway Corbyn's pro-EU contribution: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/14/jeremy-corbyn-to-urge-warts-and-all-backing-of-euAnyway Corbyn's pro-EU contribution: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/14/jeremy-corbyn-to-urge-warts-and-all-backing-of-eu
Perhaps people are getting tired of cheap rhetoric, posturing and headline grabbing?Perhaps people are getting tired of cheap rhetoric, posturing and headline grabbing?
The problem with the whole debate is this - the economic case for remaining is undeniable, and the outers have no answer other than vague stuff about being like Canada, Norway, HK, Albania etc. So they know it's pointless steering the debate that way. The area where they score though is on immigration and that concern seems to register highly with people so unsurprisingly they keep playing their trump card. So we have two sides of the debate where there's little or no middle ground and to make things worse the main protagonists are very skilled in playing the modern media game of soundbites as policy. That has become an increasing problem with modern politics - if you don't grab the headline you risk losing the debate. Personally while I have reservations about Corbyn being able to win votes from outside his core left of centre voters at least he tries to explain his stand and reasoning. No wonder the media hate him, he won't play the say something outrageous game that sells newspapers.The problem with the whole debate is this - the economic case for remaining is undeniable, and the outers have no answer other than vague stuff about being like Canada, Norway, HK, Albania etc. So they know it's pointless steering the debate that way. The area where they score though is on immigration and that concern seems to register highly with people so unsurprisingly they keep playing their trump card. So we have two sides of the debate where there's little or no middle ground and to make things worse the main protagonists are very skilled in playing the modern media game of soundbites as policy. That has become an increasing problem with modern politics - if you don't grab the headline you risk losing the debate. Personally while I have reservations about Corbyn being able to win votes from outside his core left of centre voters at least he tries to explain his stand and reasoning. No wonder the media hate him, he won't play the say something outrageous game that sells newspapers.
1.32pm BST1.32pm BST
13:3213:32
Hannah Jane ParkinsonHannah Jane Parkinson
Whither the “kinder” politics we were promised just months ago? Corbyn initiated this supposed new change of direction, but Cameron was also said to have “welcomed the more civilised” exchange during the Labour leader’s first bash at PMQs. Cut to the present EU referendum debate and the internecine ranting of both sides (and, in terms of party allegiance, the same side) has reached a nadir.Whither the “kinder” politics we were promised just months ago? Corbyn initiated this supposed new change of direction, but Cameron was also said to have “welcomed the more civilised” exchange during the Labour leader’s first bash at PMQs. Cut to the present EU referendum debate and the internecine ranting of both sides (and, in terms of party allegiance, the same side) has reached a nadir.
The polls pull in and out with the tide of Dover, but this might be less a fluctuation of inaccurate methodology and dodgy results (cough, 2015 general election, cough) and more a genuine reflection of changing minds.The polls pull in and out with the tide of Dover, but this might be less a fluctuation of inaccurate methodology and dodgy results (cough, 2015 general election, cough) and more a genuine reflection of changing minds.
One thing is clear: this is a franchise which, as with the Scottish referendum, seems to be engaging the people. Which, even with the highest turnout in the last election since Blair’s 1997 new dawn, can’t often be said. Or at least we’re always being told (especially the young) to be more politically active. It is a shame that, rather than providing facts and measured arguments, the campaigns have focused on juvenile potshots and, in the case of buses and bananas, blatant mistruths.One thing is clear: this is a franchise which, as with the Scottish referendum, seems to be engaging the people. Which, even with the highest turnout in the last election since Blair’s 1997 new dawn, can’t often be said. Or at least we’re always being told (especially the young) to be more politically active. It is a shame that, rather than providing facts and measured arguments, the campaigns have focused on juvenile potshots and, in the case of buses and bananas, blatant mistruths.
As for the nasty aspect of the campaign in comparison to others: as colleagues below have noted, as well as the enthusiasm and positivity of the Scottish referendum, there was also abuse fired across ethernet connections from both factions. I prayed for the Twitter mentions of my colleagues covering the vote. More recently, the London mayoral campaign wasn’t what one would call amicable.As for the nasty aspect of the campaign in comparison to others: as colleagues below have noted, as well as the enthusiasm and positivity of the Scottish referendum, there was also abuse fired across ethernet connections from both factions. I prayed for the Twitter mentions of my colleagues covering the vote. More recently, the London mayoral campaign wasn’t what one would call amicable.
I just hope people – and we will, because we’re not stupid – research and vote after consideration of the facts (although the Brexit camp is slightly hamstrung because it is not too sure what a post-EU UK would look like – and at least Ukip’s Suzanne Evans admitted as much).I just hope people – and we will, because we’re not stupid – research and vote after consideration of the facts (although the Brexit camp is slightly hamstrung because it is not too sure what a post-EU UK would look like – and at least Ukip’s Suzanne Evans admitted as much).
Vox pops of Boris Johnson blustering Thames-side about directives on balloons, hair like a helicopter landing in a haystack, are just a distraction. Farage, waving a passport around and straining for coverage – think cat’s paw clawing around the edge of a door – is just a distraction. Liam Fox is, well, a distraction, (also someone who shouldn’t still have a political career after giving his crooked mate a job at the heart of British defence, but whatever). Think about – from all angles – the issues that matter in regards to the future of the UK: trade, movement of people, legislation. Or, if you are still stuck, I am sure this analysis will help. You are welcome.Vox pops of Boris Johnson blustering Thames-side about directives on balloons, hair like a helicopter landing in a haystack, are just a distraction. Farage, waving a passport around and straining for coverage – think cat’s paw clawing around the edge of a door – is just a distraction. Liam Fox is, well, a distraction, (also someone who shouldn’t still have a political career after giving his crooked mate a job at the heart of British defence, but whatever). Think about – from all angles – the issues that matter in regards to the future of the UK: trade, movement of people, legislation. Or, if you are still stuck, I am sure this analysis will help. You are welcome.
1.26pm BST1.26pm BST
13:2613:26
James WalshJames Walsh
We felt our debate needed an entirely unscientific poll. Judging by what’s been written so far, these are the politicians who haven’t exactly impressed you with their tone during the EU referendum campaign. But who has been the rudest?We felt our debate needed an entirely unscientific poll. Judging by what’s been written so far, these are the politicians who haven’t exactly impressed you with their tone during the EU referendum campaign. But who has been the rudest?
An unscientific poll for our EU debate: which politician has been the rudest? https://t.co/LTFdzRwYnBAn unscientific poll for our EU debate: which politician has been the rudest? https://t.co/LTFdzRwYnB
Boris Johnson has an early lead, with 50% at the time of writing.Boris Johnson has an early lead, with 50% at the time of writing.
1.23pm BST1.23pm BST
13:2313:23
Sarah MarshSarah Marsh
News just in – Donald Trump has confirmed he is to visit the UK later this month (the day after the UK’s referendum) to attend the official reopening of his hotel and golf resort in Scotland.News just in – Donald Trump has confirmed he is to visit the UK later this month (the day after the UK’s referendum) to attend the official reopening of his hotel and golf resort in Scotland.
Related: Donald Trump to visit UK on day of EU referendum resultRelated: Donald Trump to visit UK on day of EU referendum result
1.21pm BST1.21pm BST
13:2113:21
Laura OliverLaura Oliver
Navigating these political campaigns is a voter’s nightmare. The deluge of “facts” and “counter facts” being issued by both sides of the debate is not unique to the referendum – it is reminiscent of general election campaigns, of course. In this instance, however, we are being treated to examples of out-and-out misinformation and a level of noise that is making it hard to hear the voices of those who will be most affected by the decision.Navigating these political campaigns is a voter’s nightmare. The deluge of “facts” and “counter facts” being issued by both sides of the debate is not unique to the referendum – it is reminiscent of general election campaigns, of course. In this instance, however, we are being treated to examples of out-and-out misinformation and a level of noise that is making it hard to hear the voices of those who will be most affected by the decision.
The question of whether the British public is apathetic towards Europe or whether this disengagement is the result of a communications and image problem between Brussels and the wider electorate has long been debated. This time around, the politicians campaigning on either side are falling into that trap again – swinging between statements that are aimed very much at the individual voter’s interests (house prices, for example) to issues so broad and complex that they will only obfuscate the real issue if not properly handled.The question of whether the British public is apathetic towards Europe or whether this disengagement is the result of a communications and image problem between Brussels and the wider electorate has long been debated. This time around, the politicians campaigning on either side are falling into that trap again – swinging between statements that are aimed very much at the individual voter’s interests (house prices, for example) to issues so broad and complex that they will only obfuscate the real issue if not properly handled.
As the electorate, we need honest, fact-based assessments of how different communities and people within Britain and Europe will fare. Where are the voices from lower income families, from younger voters in or out of education and work? Where are the undecided voters airing their views on what they need to know? Who is answering their questions, informing them through their campaigns? The abuse of facts discussed by Andrew Sparrow goes hand-in-hand with an abuse of this relationship with the public.As the electorate, we need honest, fact-based assessments of how different communities and people within Britain and Europe will fare. Where are the voices from lower income families, from younger voters in or out of education and work? Where are the undecided voters airing their views on what they need to know? Who is answering their questions, informing them through their campaigns? The abuse of facts discussed by Andrew Sparrow goes hand-in-hand with an abuse of this relationship with the public.
1.15pm BST1.15pm BST
13:1513:15
Sarah MarshSarah Marsh
This comment looking at immigration and the language of the campaign raises some good points. Let us know what you think below the line.This comment looking at immigration and the language of the campaign raises some good points. Let us know what you think below the line.
As an expat living in the UK, I also welcomed the referendum at first as I believed the EU has changed a lot and people should be consulted on whether they feel it is moving in the direction they want.As an expat living in the UK, I also welcomed the referendum at first as I believed the EU has changed a lot and people should be consulted on whether they feel it is moving in the direction they want.
But frankly I have started to become very worried about the language being used in the referendum campaign, particularly now that immigration has become the main focus. There seems to be no filter anymore and blatant racism is close to becoming the mainstream way of describing foreigners. You almost expect this by certain parts of the media but you also expect high ranking politicians to not sink to the same level. Watching what is crawling out from under the rocks now is scary.But frankly I have started to become very worried about the language being used in the referendum campaign, particularly now that immigration has become the main focus. There seems to be no filter anymore and blatant racism is close to becoming the mainstream way of describing foreigners. You almost expect this by certain parts of the media but you also expect high ranking politicians to not sink to the same level. Watching what is crawling out from under the rocks now is scary.
If there is a vote to leave the EU I pretty much expect the newspaper headlines to read: "The British people have spoken - now get them out!". From there it is just going to get worse.If there is a vote to leave the EU I pretty much expect the newspaper headlines to read: "The British people have spoken - now get them out!". From there it is just going to get worse.
1.14pm BST1.14pm BST
13:1413:14
James WalshJames Walsh
Another good comment on Corbyn’s Remain campaigning, particularly in the context of John McDonnell’s criticism of Sadiq Khan sharing a platform with the prime minister.Another good comment on Corbyn’s Remain campaigning, particularly in the context of John McDonnell’s criticism of Sadiq Khan sharing a platform with the prime minister.
Corbyn is not an enthusiastic Remainer we all know that. He has seen what happened to Labour after the Scottish referendum and does not want to be seen to be helping him out. However he is really not doing himself or Labour any favours by sitting on his hands. He needs to put the case for a Progressive EU.Corbyn is not an enthusiastic Remainer we all know that. He has seen what happened to Labour after the Scottish referendum and does not want to be seen to be helping him out. However he is really not doing himself or Labour any favours by sitting on his hands. He needs to put the case for a Progressive EU.
Having said all that the media has focused on the Tory Civil War which makes getting air time very difficult for anyone else.Having said all that the media has focused on the Tory Civil War which makes getting air time very difficult for anyone else.
Related: John McDonnell: sharing EU platform with Tories discredits LabourRelated: John McDonnell: sharing EU platform with Tories discredits Labour
UpdatedUpdated
at 1.15pm BSTat 1.15pm BST
1.08pm BST1.08pm BST
13:0813:08
Sarah MarshSarah Marsh
An interesting response on Corbyn. People criticise his lack of involvement, but maybe it’s better than getting involved for all the wrong reasons and playing political games. What does everyone think?An interesting response on Corbyn. People criticise his lack of involvement, but maybe it’s better than getting involved for all the wrong reasons and playing political games. What does everyone think?
Jeremy Corbyn is the politician who has most singularly let himself down mostJeremy Corbyn is the politician who has most singularly let himself down most
How? Because he used Obama's African heritage against him? Because he accused a mayoral candidate of extremism? Because he is standing on a platform of fear?How? Because he used Obama's African heritage against him? Because he accused a mayoral candidate of extremism? Because he is standing on a platform of fear?
Or because he is connecting with the electorate by showing that we can have nuanced and authentic reactions to complex issues? Because he is standing on a platform of hope that we can build a better EU?Or because he is connecting with the electorate by showing that we can have nuanced and authentic reactions to complex issues? Because he is standing on a platform of hope that we can build a better EU?
What the hell are you talking about?What the hell are you talking about?
1.01pm BST1.01pm BST
13:0113:01
Referendums bring out the divisive worst in us all – leaving a bad, lingering smellReferendums bring out the divisive worst in us all – leaving a bad, lingering smell
Michael WhiteMichael White
Like all but the most fanatical partisans in the Brexit debate (yes, there are also still some on the Remain side), I read and listen to it all with only half an ear most of the time. Referendums are not meant to be a pub brawl or a multiple choice question which is how they are usually treated. It’s another reason why they’re such a bad idea.Like all but the most fanatical partisans in the Brexit debate (yes, there are also still some on the Remain side), I read and listen to it all with only half an ear most of the time. Referendums are not meant to be a pub brawl or a multiple choice question which is how they are usually treated. It’s another reason why they’re such a bad idea.
So Margaret Thatcher would never have held one and she didn’t. They bring out the divisive worst in us and will leave a bad, lingering smell like a house fire. Just look at Scotland’s independence referendum in 2014. Anyone who says it was more civilized than 23 June version obviously wasn’t there.So Margaret Thatcher would never have held one and she didn’t. They bring out the divisive worst in us and will leave a bad, lingering smell like a house fire. Just look at Scotland’s independence referendum in 2014. Anyone who says it was more civilized than 23 June version obviously wasn’t there.
But as in Scotland so in wider Britain, some politicians can rise above it. On Radio 4 I recently heard Vince Cable and Gisella Stuart thrashing out an issue on which both Lib Dem pro-EU man and Labour Brexit woman have long-held convictions. They managed to behave decently towards each other. It can be done.But as in Scotland so in wider Britain, some politicians can rise above it. On Radio 4 I recently heard Vince Cable and Gisella Stuart thrashing out an issue on which both Lib Dem pro-EU man and Labour Brexit woman have long-held convictions. They managed to behave decently towards each other. It can be done.
Compare that with the testosterone fuelled bravado coming from the posh boys, Dave, Boris and George, all too easily copied by members of their gangs, the likes of Chris Grayling and John Redwood, the Vulcan’s Vulcan. Norman Tebbit was born with a witty sneer on his lips, but what does weighty ex chancellor, Nigel Lawson, think he’s up to? Not trying to compete with his domestic goddess of a daughter, I hope. Even Michael Gove, a naturally courteous man, has said some rude and silly things.Compare that with the testosterone fuelled bravado coming from the posh boys, Dave, Boris and George, all too easily copied by members of their gangs, the likes of Chris Grayling and John Redwood, the Vulcan’s Vulcan. Norman Tebbit was born with a witty sneer on his lips, but what does weighty ex chancellor, Nigel Lawson, think he’s up to? Not trying to compete with his domestic goddess of a daughter, I hope. Even Michael Gove, a naturally courteous man, has said some rude and silly things.
The Labour leadership’s behaviour in the contest? Is Jeremy Corbyn involved ? Like many voters I had no idea. A classic left Euro-sceptic, the best Corbyn can manage is to do little positive harm. If Britain votes Brexit it won’t do him any good.The Labour leadership’s behaviour in the contest? Is Jeremy Corbyn involved ? Like many voters I had no idea. A classic left Euro-sceptic, the best Corbyn can manage is to do little positive harm. If Britain votes Brexit it won’t do him any good.
Who has behaved conspicuously badly? Toxic Nigel Farage would if they let him, but the plan seems to be to lock him in the coal shed as much as possible. That leaves Boris Johnson, Boris Trump as I have taken to calling him (“ Boris is a nicer chap, but their campaigns are the same,” says Ken Clarke), as the winner: an outrageous and shallow abuse of his talents, as he well knows.Who has behaved conspicuously badly? Toxic Nigel Farage would if they let him, but the plan seems to be to lock him in the coal shed as much as possible. That leaves Boris Johnson, Boris Trump as I have taken to calling him (“ Boris is a nicer chap, but their campaigns are the same,” says Ken Clarke), as the winner: an outrageous and shallow abuse of his talents, as he well knows.
But Priti Patel, the junior employment minister whom Brexit newspapers like to call a “cabinet member” (she’s not), has said harsh things that won’t be forgotten either. Ambition does funny things to people. Just look at Tony Benn who dreamed up the 1975 EU referendum and thought he’d win. It didn’t solve anything. For the losers it rarely does, they keep trying until they win or get hammered.But Priti Patel, the junior employment minister whom Brexit newspapers like to call a “cabinet member” (she’s not), has said harsh things that won’t be forgotten either. Ambition does funny things to people. Just look at Tony Benn who dreamed up the 1975 EU referendum and thought he’d win. It didn’t solve anything. For the losers it rarely does, they keep trying until they win or get hammered.
UpdatedUpdated
at 1.02pm BSTat 1.02pm BST
12.55pm BST12.55pm BST
12:5512:55
James WalshJames Walsh
Boris Johnson is a satirist’s dream, so it’s a shame we’re not living in a particularly golden age for satire, the Guardian’s Steve Bell notwithstanding.Boris Johnson is a satirist’s dream, so it’s a shame we’re not living in a particularly golden age for satire, the Guardian’s Steve Bell notwithstanding.
Leave campaigners were delighted when Johnson tied his colours to their mask, but his interventions have not been without controversy, whether it’s been making strange remarks about President Obama’s ancestry or comparing the EU to Hitler.Leave campaigners were delighted when Johnson tied his colours to their mask, but his interventions have not been without controversy, whether it’s been making strange remarks about President Obama’s ancestry or comparing the EU to Hitler.
Long-time Boris watcher Adam Bienkov notes that Johnson has a history of comparing his opponents to murderous tyrants, and the former mayor often resorted to using mental health terms as insuts during mayor’s questions. He’s not lost the habit, responding to a Cameron speech on the security implications of Brexit by saying, “I think all this talk of world war three and bubonic plague is demented, frankly.”Long-time Boris watcher Adam Bienkov notes that Johnson has a history of comparing his opponents to murderous tyrants, and the former mayor often resorted to using mental health terms as insuts during mayor’s questions. He’s not lost the habit, responding to a Cameron speech on the security implications of Brexit by saying, “I think all this talk of world war three and bubonic plague is demented, frankly.”
Ken Clarke recently compared Johnson to the similarly coiffured Donald Trump. Our own Jonathan Freedland has called him a “post-truth” politician.Ken Clarke recently compared Johnson to the similarly coiffured Donald Trump. Our own Jonathan Freedland has called him a “post-truth” politician.
If Britain votes Leave, he could very well be the next prime minister.If Britain votes Leave, he could very well be the next prime minister.
Related: Steve Bell's If ... on trying to control Boris JohnsonRelated: Steve Bell's If ... on trying to control Boris Johnson
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that Boris Johnson has been by far the most toxic of all the leading politicians on both sides of the divide.There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that Boris Johnson has been by far the most toxic of all the leading politicians on both sides of the divide.
His offensive and borderline racist observations about Obama, Germany, Turkey and its people and more have ensured that the debate has turned very ugly indeed. His contribution amounts to a litany of deliberately divisive and damaging comments on immigration and immigrants that will have major repercussions for racial and social harmony in Britain, possibly for years to come.His offensive and borderline racist observations about Obama, Germany, Turkey and its people and more have ensured that the debate has turned very ugly indeed. His contribution amounts to a litany of deliberately divisive and damaging comments on immigration and immigrants that will have major repercussions for racial and social harmony in Britain, possibly for years to come.
Many of the Brexiters I have had conversations with, have been articulate with their arguments. To the point where I can agree on some issues (democracy within the EU hierarchy, for example)Many of the Brexiters I have had conversations with, have been articulate with their arguments. To the point where I can agree on some issues (democracy within the EU hierarchy, for example)
However, when you speak with the majority of Brexiters, their arguments very quickly descend into name calling as soon as you refute any of their assertions. Why is this so? In my opinion, it's because they see this happening from from their "leaders" on a daily basis. Again, imo, Boris has been terrible for this kind of childish behaviour. With the others not far behind.However, when you speak with the majority of Brexiters, their arguments very quickly descend into name calling as soon as you refute any of their assertions. Why is this so? In my opinion, it's because they see this happening from from their "leaders" on a daily basis. Again, imo, Boris has been terrible for this kind of childish behaviour. With the others not far behind.
UpdatedUpdated
at 1.04pm BSTat 1.04pm BST