This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2017/oct/27/politics-live-high-court-citizenship-joyce
The article has changed 18 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
AFP won't hand over seized AWU documents until after December – politics live | |
(35 minutes later) | |
12.54am BST | |
00:54 | |
If necessary, the soonest a byelection in New England could be held is December 2. | |
From speaking to those in the government I get the feeling that now they are just waiting to see what switch they need to flick. They seem as keen to get this decision over and done with as you do. | |
As for what happens with the senators, those next in line seem ready to pick up the mantle, including Hollie Hughes (next in line for Nash) and Joanna Lindgren (next in line for Canavan) | |
12.45am BST | |
00:45 | |
Time is ticking closer to the high court decision. | |
For those needing a refresher, Paul Karp and Katharine Murphy have put together a nice story here , which includes the context of the week that was: | |
The controversy over Cash came as nervousness within the Coalition increased ahead of the high court ruling. | |
The “citizenship seven” are: Joyce, deputy Nationals leader Fiona Nash, former resources and Northern Australia minister Matt Canavan, One Nation senator Malcolm Roberts, senator Nick Xenophon and former Greens senators Larissa Waters and Scott Ludlam. | |
Joyce will face a byelection in New England if found ineligible, while senators will be replaced by a recount likely to return the next candidate on their parties’ 2016 Senate ticket. | |
If Joyce is found ineligible, the Turnbull government will have 75 lower house seats, making it more likely to lose house votes unless the Coalition retains Joyce’s seat against a likely run by former independent MP Tony Windsor. | |
12.41am BST | |
00:41 | |
AFP won't hand over seized AWU documents until after December | |
The court timetable means the AFP won’t hand over any of the documents it seized during the raids to the Registered Organisations Commission until after the court has heard the case. | |
The ROC have until 1 December to file their defence. That doesn’t leave a lot of time for the federal court to hear the case, because they usually go on Christmas break. So expect this to go on for a while. | |
Updated | |
at 12.45am BST | |
12.37am BST | |
00:37 | |
The court hearing, which was to set further directions on the AWU’s challenge of the validity of the raids on its office, has been cancelled. It was deemed not necessary as the parties both agreed on a timetable themselves. | |
Maurice Blackburn, which is representing the AWU; just released this statement: | |
A court timetable has been set in the AWU’s fight to challenge the validity of this week’s unprecedented police raids launched by the Registered Organisations Commission (ROC) on the union’s Sydney and Melbourne offices. | |
Maurice Blackburn Lawyers, who are representing the AWU, said today that court orders confirming a timetable for the case had been agreed to by all parties, removing the need for a federal court directions hearing that had been scheduled for this morning in Melbourne. | |
Maurice Blackburn Principal Josh Bornstein said critically that the orders were made together with commitments from both the ROC and AFP that no documents seized in this week’s raids by the AFP will be handed over to the ROC until the court has heard the case. | |
Mr Bornstein said the union’s case compromised two key parts, namely:· That the raid conducted by the AFP was illegal; and· That the investigation by the ROC is illegal because it is politically motivated. | |
“Prior to these raids, the union had handed over disclosure statements from 10 years ago in relation to Get Up donations to the ROC, but in doing so had pressed the regulator to provide it with information about the political interference by the Turnbull government in this matter. | |
“Disturbingly, the ROC has refused to hand over all file notes of its communications with minister Cash and her office and we will continue to seek all such documents as part of the federal court case,” he said. | |
Under the agreed timetable, evidence must be obtained from all parties next month, with the respondents required to file their defence by 1 December 2017. A substantive hearing will be held in December at a date to be set, following the filing of defences. | |
Updated | |
at 12.41am BST | |
12.28am BST | |
00:28 | |
Doug Cameron is back in the committee and he withdraws his previous statement about George Brandis. The hearing moves on, still on asbestos. | |
12.21am BST | |
00:21 | |
My colleague Calla Wahlquist is listening to the estimates hearing examining Indigenous issues. Follow her on @callapilla to learn more. | |
Dodson pushing Scullion on whether the govt might support a voice if it was established by simple legislation, not in the constitution. | |
Updated | |
at 12.39am BST | |
12.17am BST | 12.17am BST |
00:17 | 00:17 |
Meanwhile, back in Queensland, where everyone is on high alert, the election will be called within days, and Katter’s Australian party have made their position clear. | |
If it hold the balance of the power in the state (KAP has two Queensland MPs at this stage), state leader Robbie Katter, son of Bob, says the party will “immediately take the first step toward the establishment of north Queensland as a separate state”. | |
That first step is forming a committee “of independent experts with knowledge of the legal, economic and social factors to be considered”. | |
And the border? The KAP says it should be at Rockhampton, with Rocky becoming part of north Queensland. | |
Updated | |
at 12.40am BST | |
12.04am BST | 12.04am BST |
00:04 | 00:04 |
The meeting returns, although Doug Cameron doesn’t immediately return to the room. | The meeting returns, although Doug Cameron doesn’t immediately return to the room. |
George Brandis starts with a statement: | George Brandis starts with a statement: |
“Senator Cameron made a very serious and untruthful reflection on me, he said that I had been colluding with the prime minister’s office in relation to this morning’s hearing, not withstanding he asked me whether I discussed this morning’s hearing with the prime minister or his office or whether my staff had done so, to which the answer was a simple and unequivocal no. I require, I ask him to require that that reflection be withdrawn, so when senator Cameron returns, he does the appropriate thing and of course if he refuses to, then there are certain courses of action open to you, which I would ask you to follow.” | |
Linda Reynolds says she will raise it with Cameron when he returns. | Linda Reynolds says she will raise it with Cameron when he returns. |
Updated | |
at 12.42am BST | |
11.59pm BST | 11.59pm BST |
23:59 | 23:59 |
Doug Cameron asks George Brandis if he is aware why Michaelia Cash can’t be before the committee today. | Doug Cameron asks George Brandis if he is aware why Michaelia Cash can’t be before the committee today. |
“I am aware that she has a long-standing prior commitment,” Brandis says. | |
Cameron: Could you provide details as to what that engagement is to the committee? | |
Brandis: I’ll take that on notice. | Brandis: I’ll take that on notice. |
Cameron: I have just got to say we have a minister in senator Cash who has thrown one of her staff under the bus to protect her own, activity, her own position. | |
He is interrupted by Linda Reynolds who asks if it is a question or a general statement. | He is interrupted by Linda Reynolds who asks if it is a question or a general statement. |
The hearing dissolves into yelling, as Reynolds attempts to quiet Cameron, who, I can’t hear entirely but says something about “ collusion with the prime minister’s office, coming in here and actually trying to cover up, this is a ... ” | |
Reynolds cuts the microphones and the meeting goes private. | Reynolds cuts the microphones and the meeting goes private. |
Updated | |
at 12.43am BST | |
11.53pm BST | 11.53pm BST |
23:53 | 23:53 |
Doug Cameron has the floor in the committee and he is asking George Brandis whether steps have been taken to secure the computer and equipment of the “media director of the Fair Work Ombudsman”. | |
“I personally haven’t,” Brandis says. | “I personally haven’t,” Brandis says. |
“... I don’t know the answer to that question, senator Cameron, but the matter is the subject of a current investigation.” | |
Cameron asks if Brandis has attended a briefing from the prime minister’s office on this issue. | Cameron asks if Brandis has attended a briefing from the prime minister’s office on this issue. |
Brandis says he has not. And that none of his staff have, with two succinct no’s to each question. | |
But when it gets to whether any of Michaelia Cash has, he refers to the public interest immunity convention. | But when it gets to whether any of Michaelia Cash has, he refers to the public interest immunity convention. |
“The chair has ruled that this matter will not be dealt with until after the morning tea adjournment,” Brandis says. | “The chair has ruled that this matter will not be dealt with until after the morning tea adjournment,” Brandis says. |
That will be after the redacted letter will have been tabled, the one which will lay out all of the issues Brandis says he can’t talk about because of public interest immunity. | That will be after the redacted letter will have been tabled, the one which will lay out all of the issues Brandis says he can’t talk about because of public interest immunity. |
Updated | |
at 12.44am BST | |
11.43pm BST | 11.43pm BST |
23:43 | 23:43 |
Nick Xenophon is on the committee, asking questions of the asbestos safety and eradication agency. Today is his last chance to ask these questions. Even if the high court rules he is safe, he is resigning to run in the South Australian state election. | Nick Xenophon is on the committee, asking questions of the asbestos safety and eradication agency. Today is his last chance to ask these questions. Even if the high court rules he is safe, he is resigning to run in the South Australian state election. |
Updated | Updated |
at 11.44pm BST | at 11.44pm BST |
11.38pm BST | 11.38pm BST |
23:38 | 23:38 |
The committee has returned. | The committee has returned. |
Linda Reynolds says it is important for the committee to know what issues George Brandis will be claiming public interest immunity on. Brandis’s office are preparing that letter as we speak. | Linda Reynolds says it is important for the committee to know what issues George Brandis will be claiming public interest immunity on. Brandis’s office are preparing that letter as we speak. |
But the one which will be tabled publicly, will be redacted. | But the one which will be tabled publicly, will be redacted. |
11.35pm BST | 11.35pm BST |
23:35 | 23:35 |
While we wait on the committee to reconvene, I’ll remind you that Scott Morrison is due to meet with the state and territory treasurers today. | While we wait on the committee to reconvene, I’ll remind you that Scott Morrison is due to meet with the state and territory treasurers today. |
The Australian had a very interesting story ahead of this. | The Australian had a very interesting story ahead of this. |
11.29pm BST | 11.29pm BST |
23:29 | 23:29 |
In other news, Malcolm Turnbull was spotted out and about for his usual morning walk by Nine News this morning, leading to this exchange: | In other news, Malcolm Turnbull was spotted out and about for his usual morning walk by Nine News this morning, leading to this exchange: |
Nine: Morning, prime minister – big day today? | Nine: Morning, prime minister – big day today? |
Turnbull: It’s always a beautiful day in Canberra. | Turnbull: It’s always a beautiful day in Canberra. |
Nine: Will you still have a deputy PM this afternoon? | Nine: Will you still have a deputy PM this afternoon? |
Turnbull: We look forward to the high court’s decision. | Turnbull: We look forward to the high court’s decision. |
That’s a slight walkback from Turnbull’s declaration in August that Joyce was “qualified to sit in the house and the high court will so hold”. | That’s a slight walkback from Turnbull’s declaration in August that Joyce was “qualified to sit in the house and the high court will so hold”. |
Updated | Updated |
at 11.49pm BST | at 11.49pm BST |
11.25pm BST | 11.25pm BST |
23:25 | 23:25 |
AFP to investigate AWU raid leak | AFP to investigate AWU raid leak |
Michaelia Cash had “longstanding” electorate business in Western Australia and so is not before the estimates hearing looking into the Registered Organisations Commission today. | Michaelia Cash had “longstanding” electorate business in Western Australia and so is not before the estimates hearing looking into the Registered Organisations Commission today. |
But George Brandis is. | But George Brandis is. |
And he opens by announcing the Australian federal police have opened an investigation into the leak to the media of the raids of the AWU offices. | And he opens by announcing the Australian federal police have opened an investigation into the leak to the media of the raids of the AWU offices. |
He says given the investigation, questions over the leak – with a lot of this morning’s hearing, at least according to Labor members of the committee – meant to focus on who was the “media source” who alerted Cash’s staffer the raids were coming – would be inappropriate. As we already know, Cash’s staffer, David De Garis, alerted some media outlets. He has resigned. | He says given the investigation, questions over the leak – with a lot of this morning’s hearing, at least according to Labor members of the committee – meant to focus on who was the “media source” who alerted Cash’s staffer the raids were coming – would be inappropriate. As we already know, Cash’s staffer, David De Garis, alerted some media outlets. He has resigned. |
The minister denied five times in an estimates hearing on Wednesday that her office had anything to do with the leak. After the publication of a BuzzFeed article by Alice Workman, which confirmed journalists had been told about the raids by Cash’s office, Cash “corrected the record”. | The minister denied five times in an estimates hearing on Wednesday that her office had anything to do with the leak. After the publication of a BuzzFeed article by Alice Workman, which confirmed journalists had been told about the raids by Cash’s office, Cash “corrected the record”. |
Yesterday Cash faced a further two hours of questioning by the Senate committee, but didn’t reveal much more than she had on Wednesday evening, other than she had asked the ROC to consider referring the matter to the AFP. Today, Brandis said the ROC had decided to do just that, and the AFP had taken on the investigation. | Yesterday Cash faced a further two hours of questioning by the Senate committee, but didn’t reveal much more than she had on Wednesday evening, other than she had asked the ROC to consider referring the matter to the AFP. Today, Brandis said the ROC had decided to do just that, and the AFP had taken on the investigation. |
He says that would make it inappropriate for any further questions to be asked about the issue, which would gag Labor from integrating ROC officials over where the leak could have originated from. | He says that would make it inappropriate for any further questions to be asked about the issue, which would gag Labor from integrating ROC officials over where the leak could have originated from. |
Labor has protested that, with Doug Cameron pointing out that the matter is not before the court, and the AFP does not direct the Senate. Brandis suggested public interest immunity may prevent anyone from asking questions, and the chair, Linda Reynolds, is now looking at whether prejudicing an investigation (which is part of public interest immunity) will prevent questions from being asked. | Labor has protested that, with Doug Cameron pointing out that the matter is not before the court, and the AFP does not direct the Senate. Brandis suggested public interest immunity may prevent anyone from asking questions, and the chair, Linda Reynolds, is now looking at whether prejudicing an investigation (which is part of public interest immunity) will prevent questions from being asked. |
The committee is on break as it discusses the issue. | The committee is on break as it discusses the issue. |
Updated | Updated |
at 11.41pm BST | at 11.41pm BST |
11.12pm BST | 11.12pm BST |
23:12 | 23:12 |
Good morning and welcome to a special edition of politics live | Good morning and welcome to a special edition of politics live |
It’s Friday on a sitting week and usually we would be quietly twitching in a corner somewhere while madly working out what happened, what didn’t and what it all means. | It’s Friday on a sitting week and usually we would be quietly twitching in a corner somewhere while madly working out what happened, what didn’t and what it all means. |
But it’s not just any Friday – it’s high court Friday, when the high court will hand down its judgment on the seven MPs – Barnaby Joyce, Matt Canavan, Fiona Nash, Larissa Waters, Scott Ludlam, Nick Xenophon and Malcolm Roberts. | But it’s not just any Friday – it’s high court Friday, when the high court will hand down its judgment on the seven MPs – Barnaby Joyce, Matt Canavan, Fiona Nash, Larissa Waters, Scott Ludlam, Nick Xenophon and Malcolm Roberts. |
It’s Joyce who has captured most of the government’s attention. He’s the only lower house MP (in this round – David Gillespie is also before the high court on a separate section 44 matter) and if the high court rules him ineligible, we are headed to a byelection in New England. | It’s Joyce who has captured most of the government’s attention. He’s the only lower house MP (in this round – David Gillespie is also before the high court on a separate section 44 matter) and if the high court rules him ineligible, we are headed to a byelection in New England. |
But before we get to that, there is another estimates hearing involving the AWU raid saga, and the federal court will give further directions on what can happen to the documents seized by the Australian federal police, at the direction of the Registered Organisations Commission, after a referral from Michaelia Cash over the disclosure of donations by the AWU while it was helmed by Bill Shorten. | But before we get to that, there is another estimates hearing involving the AWU raid saga, and the federal court will give further directions on what can happen to the documents seized by the Australian federal police, at the direction of the Registered Organisations Commission, after a referral from Michaelia Cash over the disclosure of donations by the AWU while it was helmed by Bill Shorten. |
So let’s get started. | So let’s get started. |
Updated | Updated |
at 11.29pm BST | at 11.29pm BST |