This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/live/2016/jun/08/has-hillary-clintons-victory-finally-shattered-the-glass-ceiling-for-women-live

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Has the glass ceiling for women finally been shattered by Hillary Clinton? – live Has the glass ceiling for women finally been shattered by Hillary Clinton? – live
(35 minutes later)
2.01pm BST
14:01
James Walsh
Comments on our live blog will be closing shortly - thanks to all our contributors and commenters for taking part in such an interesting debate.
A quick glance at our poll shows 75% think Clinton’s victory does not constitute the breaking of the glass ceiling for women - a percentage that reflects the views coming in via our form and below the line. It feels like Clinton has plenty to do in terms of reaching out to Bernie Sanders supporters in particular.
We’ll host another debate next Wednesday - you can contact Sarah.Marsh@theguardian.com and / or James.Walsh@theguardian.com with your topic suggestions.
Thanks all.
1.57pm BST
13:57
A woman in the White House would bring to the surface existing concerns around structural, ingrained sexism
James Walsh
A few more comments from below the line from our readers.
I think, much like Obama's presidency has seemed to provide time and space for systemic issues of race discrimination to be highlighted and talked about openly and repeatedly, a woman in the White House would bring to the surface existing concerns around structural, ingrained sexism. Whether or not America has ways to address these problems around both race and gender is less clear.
She is a brilliant woman and the US will be in more capable hands than with Trump. But it is tough to see this as a watershed moment for a few reasons.
1. The taboo of women leaders is long past. Merkel is titan and Scotland's main parties are run by women. Clinton isn't making history so much as she is a beneficiary. Perhaps she should be doffing her cap to the likes of Thatcher.
2. It was as close to a coronation as you can get. Whatever you wish to say about Trump, he at least fought through 16 tough, big name candidates. The entire Democratic establishment rolled over for Hillary, thanks to the machine they've developed. It took a 70-something independent to give her any competition. There was a democratic deficit.
3. She is close to being unaccountable. She didn't take questions from the press for months. She got a documentary about her, made by Oscar winner Charles Ferguson, effectively shut down by ordering that nobody talks to him. Is this the kind of figure we should be celebrating just because of her body parts?
4. There are large demographics really suffering out there, and in need of true champions who offer radical policies. Clinton has not done that for them. There's a reason Sanders attracted such support, and it wasn't because of his gender. The status quo simply won't be good enough for a lot of people out there.
You ask the average liberal voter (probably conservative too), and they'd have little truck with Elizabeth Warren running for president. Indeed, she'd have unconditional support in most quarters. The issues with the Clintons of this world go way beyond gender.
1.46pm BST
13:46
Stop and think how women who reach positions of power are showered with contempt
Polly Toynbee
Hillary Clinton’s nomination is thrilling. She’s not just any woman, but a feminist who has fought all her life for every woman’s cause – from abortion to equal rights. That makes her unpopular – not unlike our own Harriet Harman, who is despised for her feminist campaigning, yet neither have ever been deterred by personal abuse. They grew thick skins through many hard years of feminist campaigns.
Stop and think how women who reach positions of power are showered with contempt – and if you, as a woman, think you don’t like Hillary (or Harriet), ask yourself if you are subtly influenced by the constant attacks on them by those who hate feminists? Worse still, is there some part of you that wants women to be fighting from the outside, always the victims, never the holders of power in a position to actually make changes to women’s lives?
Hurrah for Hillary!
1.26pm BST1.26pm BST
13:2613:26
I hope she does the job well under all the added pressure that being a woman in the public eye bringsI hope she does the job well under all the added pressure that being a woman in the public eye brings
James WalshJames Walsh
A comment via our form, which is still eagerly accepting reader views.A comment via our form, which is still eagerly accepting reader views.
Hilary does not represent all women. When a man runs for president or is elected, he is not expected to represent all men. The bar is always higher for women, she is more than qualified to be President. I think it is great that a woman is running for President. She will surely be a better president than Sanders or Trump. I don’t expect her to change things for women but hope that she brings a different perspective and a different way of looking and thinking about women’s issues that influences others. I hope she does the job well under all the added pressure that being a woman in the public eye brings, a scrutiny that, as we all know, men aren’t subjected to.Hilary does not represent all women. When a man runs for president or is elected, he is not expected to represent all men. The bar is always higher for women, she is more than qualified to be President. I think it is great that a woman is running for President. She will surely be a better president than Sanders or Trump. I don’t expect her to change things for women but hope that she brings a different perspective and a different way of looking and thinking about women’s issues that influences others. I hope she does the job well under all the added pressure that being a woman in the public eye brings, a scrutiny that, as we all know, men aren’t subjected to.
UpdatedUpdated
at 1.26pm BSTat 1.26pm BST
1.22pm BST1.22pm BST
13:2213:22
The nomination has been gifted to her by a bunch of elderly white superdelegatesThe nomination has been gifted to her by a bunch of elderly white superdelegates
Sarah MarshSarah Marsh
Some astute observations from commenters.Some astute observations from commenters.
"There can be no doubt that Hillary Clinton’s victory in the Democratic nomination race is a breakthrough for women""There can be no doubt that Hillary Clinton’s victory in the Democratic nomination race is a breakthrough for women"
Yep the nomination has been gifted to her by a bunch of elderly white Superdelegates. In exchange she'll do exactly what they tell her to and her policies will no doubt do more harm to women than menYep the nomination has been gifted to her by a bunch of elderly white Superdelegates. In exchange she'll do exactly what they tell her to and her policies will no doubt do more harm to women than men
Absolutely revolutionaryAbsolutely revolutionary
Here is a list where a women has been elected a PM/ President:-- Brazil- Australia- United Kingdom- Israel- Portugal- Norway- Canada- Turkey- A LOT MORE...To say that just because it is the US who COULD elect a Female Leader why is it a case where only she is eligible for breaking the 'Glass Ceiling', there have been loads of Female leaders over the past 50 years and even though Hillary isn't actually President yet, she's only the leader of the Democrats, she is automatically labelled as the one 'Who breaks the 'Glass Ceiling'.Here is a list where a women has been elected a PM/ President:-- Brazil- Australia- United Kingdom- Israel- Portugal- Norway- Canada- Turkey- A LOT MORE...To say that just because it is the US who COULD elect a Female Leader why is it a case where only she is eligible for breaking the 'Glass Ceiling', there have been loads of Female leaders over the past 50 years and even though Hillary isn't actually President yet, she's only the leader of the Democrats, she is automatically labelled as the one 'Who breaks the 'Glass Ceiling'.
1.13pm BST1.13pm BST
13:1313:13
James WalshJames Walsh
On the one hand:On the one hand:
“It’s exciting that she is the first woman nominee. It’s historic regardless what one may think of her personally.”“It’s exciting that she is the first woman nominee. It’s historic regardless what one may think of her personally.”
On the other:On the other:
“I understand that many people see this as historic because she ‘broke the glass ceiling’.” But didn’t you folks across the pond have Margaret Thatcher? Didn’t we have Sarah Palin running for VP? It has to be about more than gender.”“I understand that many people see this as historic because she ‘broke the glass ceiling’.” But didn’t you folks across the pond have Margaret Thatcher? Didn’t we have Sarah Palin running for VP? It has to be about more than gender.”
As mentioned earlier, we’ve been putting together reader reaction on Clinton’s candidacy. You can read the full vox pops below.As mentioned earlier, we’ve been putting together reader reaction on Clinton’s candidacy. You can read the full vox pops below.
Related: 'It’s between a buffoon and a vampire': readers on Clinton's candidacyRelated: 'It’s between a buffoon and a vampire': readers on Clinton's candidacy
1.13pm BST1.13pm BST
13:1313:13
What are the biggest challenges women face in the UK?What are the biggest challenges women face in the UK?
Sarah MarshSarah Marsh
It’s interesting to use this debate to also look at the biggest challenges for women in the UK. What do people think that they are? How far are we in terms of equality in politics? Sadiq Khan, the new mayor of London, just appointed two women in top roles.It’s interesting to use this debate to also look at the biggest challenges for women in the UK. What do people think that they are? How far are we in terms of equality in politics? Sadiq Khan, the new mayor of London, just appointed two women in top roles.
A while ago I ran a piece that explored challenges around the world. Here are two contributions from the UK that offer food for thought:A while ago I ran a piece that explored challenges around the world. Here are two contributions from the UK that offer food for thought:
Mary, 57: ‘We need more support for victims of domestic violence’Mary, 57: ‘We need more support for victims of domestic violence’
I am the parent of a young woman who is the victim of domestic violence. She feels powerless and let down by the lack of legal support (the government has removed legal aid for domestic violence cases and funding to support agencies), and the absence of police officers who know how to deal with these cases and provide the right information. My daughter doesn’t believe anyone is on her side or that she has any power. The passing of legislation, which includes bullying and coercive behaviour under the umbrella of domestic violence, has been a good move, but women really need more support to help them win these cases. They need to feel safe and that we’re on their side.I am the parent of a young woman who is the victim of domestic violence. She feels powerless and let down by the lack of legal support (the government has removed legal aid for domestic violence cases and funding to support agencies), and the absence of police officers who know how to deal with these cases and provide the right information. My daughter doesn’t believe anyone is on her side or that she has any power. The passing of legislation, which includes bullying and coercive behaviour under the umbrella of domestic violence, has been a good move, but women really need more support to help them win these cases. They need to feel safe and that we’re on their side.
Chardine, 30: ‘Street harassment and racism are daily occurrences’Chardine, 30: ‘Street harassment and racism are daily occurrences’
Street harassment, misogyny and racism are a daily occurrence for black women in this country. If we are not on the receiving end of those then we are treated as if we are invisible. I could give several accounts of situations where I have been outright ignored and then the very thing I said repeated by a white man and given praise. When you challenge that behaviour you are then called an “angry black woman” or told that you are “too proud”. We all need to be more open to listening to each other and stop building defences when someone challenges us on our behaviours that oppress others.Street harassment, misogyny and racism are a daily occurrence for black women in this country. If we are not on the receiving end of those then we are treated as if we are invisible. I could give several accounts of situations where I have been outright ignored and then the very thing I said repeated by a white man and given praise. When you challenge that behaviour you are then called an “angry black woman” or told that you are “too proud”. We all need to be more open to listening to each other and stop building defences when someone challenges us on our behaviours that oppress others.
1.03pm BST1.03pm BST
13:0313:03
How on earth could rallying around such a capable woman be a dreary chore?How on earth could rallying around such a capable woman be a dreary chore?
James WalshJames Walsh
Comments keep on heading in - remember, if you’d lacking a commenting account, we have a form you can fill out instead.Comments keep on heading in - remember, if you’d lacking a commenting account, we have a form you can fill out instead.
Here’s a reader who is slightly bemused at the lack of excitement at what a Clinton victory would represent.Here’s a reader who is slightly bemused at the lack of excitement at what a Clinton victory would represent.
I get the caveats, objections, dislike. What I don’t understand is the supposed lack of excitement. Isn’t it a pleasure to listen to somebody so very intelligent and knowledgeable, even if you partly disagree with her (if in every item, you’re a Republican anyway)? How on earth could rallying around such a capable woman be a dreary chore?And the impact of this news in, say, Saudi Arabia. Mmm. Great.I get the caveats, objections, dislike. What I don’t understand is the supposed lack of excitement. Isn’t it a pleasure to listen to somebody so very intelligent and knowledgeable, even if you partly disagree with her (if in every item, you’re a Republican anyway)? How on earth could rallying around such a capable woman be a dreary chore?And the impact of this news in, say, Saudi Arabia. Mmm. Great.
UpdatedUpdated
at 1.04pm BSTat 1.04pm BST
12.57pm BST12.57pm BST
12:5712:57
Clinton should reflect on how embedded in big business and the establishment she isClinton should reflect on how embedded in big business and the establishment she is
Dawn FosterDawn Foster
The Democratic race ended fittingly – a calculation by CNN rather than an outright win, figured that with the backing of undeclared super-delegates, Hillary Clinton had won the race. Little fanfare, and a quiet embarrassment that Clinton should have walked it, but struggled so much against an outsider, a more radical, much older senator from Vermont, who few had heard of before, but managed to whip young people into a frenzy.The Democratic race ended fittingly – a calculation by CNN rather than an outright win, figured that with the backing of undeclared super-delegates, Hillary Clinton had won the race. Little fanfare, and a quiet embarrassment that Clinton should have walked it, but struggled so much against an outsider, a more radical, much older senator from Vermont, who few had heard of before, but managed to whip young people into a frenzy.
Bernie Sanders appealed far more to me than Clinton throughout the race, and clearly many young people felt the same: the idea that gender trumps class and economic position is clearly bunk: economic inequality and gender inequality go hand in hand, and young women have had enough of both. That Clinton is the first female candidate to have a clear run for the White House is momentous: but the argument that women should by virtue of their gender have always supported Clinton over Sanders is patronising. Clinton should be shaken by how difficult she found it to win the nomination, and reflect on how embedded in big business and the establishment she is: many other women in US politics, such as Kshama Sawant and Elizabeth Warren, show you can be a woman in politics and kick back at traditional power structures and conventions: Clinton should follow suit.Bernie Sanders appealed far more to me than Clinton throughout the race, and clearly many young people felt the same: the idea that gender trumps class and economic position is clearly bunk: economic inequality and gender inequality go hand in hand, and young women have had enough of both. That Clinton is the first female candidate to have a clear run for the White House is momentous: but the argument that women should by virtue of their gender have always supported Clinton over Sanders is patronising. Clinton should be shaken by how difficult she found it to win the nomination, and reflect on how embedded in big business and the establishment she is: many other women in US politics, such as Kshama Sawant and Elizabeth Warren, show you can be a woman in politics and kick back at traditional power structures and conventions: Clinton should follow suit.
12.47pm BST12.47pm BST
12:4712:47
James WalshJames Walsh
We’re trying out our fancy new polling tool for the first time in a Guardian live blog: a historic moment, though perhaps not quite as historic as Clinton’s status as Democratic nominee.We’re trying out our fancy new polling tool for the first time in a Guardian live blog: a historic moment, though perhaps not quite as historic as Clinton’s status as Democratic nominee.
UpdatedUpdated
at 12.49pm BSTat 12.49pm BST
12.42pm BST12.42pm BST
12:4212:42
Clinton’s nomination is a crack in the glass ceiling – but there's a way to go to shatter itClinton’s nomination is a crack in the glass ceiling – but there's a way to go to shatter it
Harriet MinterHarriet Minter
There can be no doubt that Hillary Clinton’s victory in the Democratic nomination race is a breakthrough for women but I’m not sure it’s shattered the glass ceiling. The campaign against Clinton has focused a lot on how she might be a woman but she’s still old politics – she isn’t as radical as Sanders, as out-there as Trump. The sad reality though, is that had she been a bigger personality, with more extreme views and less interest in what people thought of her, she wouldn’t now have the nomination. You can be as radical as you like when you’re a white man and still command some level of respect. The rest of us are walking a very thin tight rope of trying to blend in enough that we’re accepted but not so much that we’re overlooked. We’re not yet at the point where women can do that in their own way, we still have to play the game to get ahead. The only way we’ll start to change this is when we reach a critical mass of women in power, when there are so many of us that standing out is not only necessary but desirable. Clinton’s nomination is a crack in the glass ceiling but it’s those who take up politics because of her, who see a female president and believe they can do that too (regardless of whether they want to endorse her policies or tear them down) that will really smash it.There can be no doubt that Hillary Clinton’s victory in the Democratic nomination race is a breakthrough for women but I’m not sure it’s shattered the glass ceiling. The campaign against Clinton has focused a lot on how she might be a woman but she’s still old politics – she isn’t as radical as Sanders, as out-there as Trump. The sad reality though, is that had she been a bigger personality, with more extreme views and less interest in what people thought of her, she wouldn’t now have the nomination. You can be as radical as you like when you’re a white man and still command some level of respect. The rest of us are walking a very thin tight rope of trying to blend in enough that we’re accepted but not so much that we’re overlooked. We’re not yet at the point where women can do that in their own way, we still have to play the game to get ahead. The only way we’ll start to change this is when we reach a critical mass of women in power, when there are so many of us that standing out is not only necessary but desirable. Clinton’s nomination is a crack in the glass ceiling but it’s those who take up politics because of her, who see a female president and believe they can do that too (regardless of whether they want to endorse her policies or tear them down) that will really smash it.
UpdatedUpdated
at 12.51pm BSTat 12.51pm BST
12.40pm BST
12:40
Two interesting comments:
Do people want a woman for a president or a president that cares about women? If it's the latter, you've picked the wrong horse. Bernie actually gives a rats whilst Hilary just wants to sit on the throne.
I would say it's a significant crack rather than a smash. One person getting in at the top/elite level doesn't create an immediate culture change - see how women starting to get into boardrooms hasn't overnight eliminated sexism in workplaces - and Clinton becoming President wouldn't necessarily change much in the day to day of women from less privileged backgrounds. But it's a big step.
12.39pm BST
12:39
James Walsh
Another view from the comments, from a reader who thinks Clinton’s establishment credentials “severely undercut” the historical impact of her candidacy.
Anyone out there excited or inspired by Clinton’s achievement?
I feel like the female factor is severely undercut by the fact that it's Clinton.The idea that Hilary Clinton is in anyway representative of women, or what it's possible for women to achieve seems warped to me.
Is she a good candidate for president irrespective of her being a woman?I don't think so. I think her politics is stale and her leadership is weak. I think she's more vulnerable to Trump than Sanders would have been. She's an establishment pick in the middle of the biggest outpouring of anti establishment fervour in the modern era and at a time when the world can ill afford "Business as Usual" politics she is a continuity candidate promising nothing but Business as Usual.
12.31pm BST
12:31
Sarah Marsh
Would like to highlight attention to this interesting comment from our anonymous form:
The election of Barack Obama in 2008 was held up by many as evidence of a “post-racial” US society. Well, eight years later we witness an openly racist candidate winning the Republican nomination. The temptation to see single events as shattering long-standing social structures is strong, but it’s just a way to avoid uncomfortable discussions on deep systematic discrimination (like racism and sexism).
Updated
at 12.31pm BST
12.25pm BST
12:25
Sarah Marsh
Many people in the comments have noted that the US is in fact behind in terms of the progress of other countries in this area (AKA Margaret Thatcher):
It is 37 years since Mrs Thatcher became UK prime minister.
Golda Meir was Israeli PM before that.
Just what is special about Clinton merely becoming a candidate in an election?
Meir, Ghandi, Thatcher, Gillard, Merkel and I bet several more beat the US by decades in some cases. They have a lot of catching up to do, particularly with the achievements of Aung San Suu Kyi.
Updated
at 12.30pm BST
12.23pm BST
12:23
James Walsh
We asked our readers in the US what they thought about Clinton’s candidacy, and we heard in particular from Bernie Sanders supporters who are weighing up whether to back the candidate they have been voting and campaigning against in the bruising primary process.
As both a woman and a member of the Democratic Party, I am horrified at the prospect of Clinton being the presidential candidate - a Democrat who, to add insult to injury, crows about how admired she is by one of the most reviled Secretaries of State in modern history, Henry Kissinger. Her gender is of little consequence when viewed in the totality of her person.
Hillary’s nomination is an example of how the establishment quells the progressive movement by giving us change on the outside and continuity on the inside. Having the first female candidate in a general election is our consolation prize. In return, we still have to vote for a broken and corrupt political system.
She’s such a divisive figure that I don’t know if we’ll really be able to celebrate the fact that a woman won.
Updated
at 12.27pm BST
12.17pm BST
12:17
That is the colossal event that guarantees Clinton a unique place in US history
Anne Perkins
How slowly revolutions seem to happen when you live through them. Nearly 100 years after women’s suffrage first arrived in the US, two generations after feminism began the gradual transformation of its public face, Hillary Clinton has at last become the first woman to win the presidential nomination of one of the two main parties.
That is the colossal, historic event that, win or lose, will guarantee Clinton a unique place in American history. The scale of it cannot be overstated. The world’s biggest economy might now be led by a woman; the world’s mightiest military may have a female commander in chief. There are many different versions of justice, but for women this is surely the pinnacle.
Already, Clinton is no longer a former first lady, nor a former secretary of state. If she wins, she will not be thought of as second or subordinate or wife of or mother of anyone. She will be It.
But her triumph means more than that. It is an astonishing personal achievement. The resilience she has shown throughout her public life is nothing short of an inspiration. As first lady, she has survived the wretched period of the Monica Lewinsky affair, the threat of impeachment, and two gruelling campaigns as wife of the nominee. She has been a senator, she has fought for her party’s nomination and been defeated by a challenger she had not seen coming. She was secretary of state for nearly four years.
That means the six months between now and polling day will be even more testing than they will be for her rival. She has so much to overcome – miscalls on Syria and Libya as secretary of state, questions over her use of a private email account, her huge income from public speaking, her chill public demeanour and the political challenge left to the Democrats by Bernie Sanders.
It means something else, though. She has been through so much already. She is truly fired in the unrelenting heat of the public gaze. She is not likely to crack now.
Updated
at 12.23pm BST
12.09pm BST
12:09
This job will never be open to those not born into class privilege
Julie Bindel
I do not care about the glass ceiling while millions of women and girls live in abject poverty. No working class girl who is growing up in this cruel, neoliberal world will look at Clinton and think, “I could be president/prime minister one day” because this job will never be open to those not born into class privilege.
Clinton is no feminist, and has betrayed the women that accused Bill Clinton of sexual assault in order to further her career. I would vote for any Democrat to keep the Republicans out, including Clinton, but she is no friend to women.
12.06pm BST
12:06
James Walsh
Here are a few responses to Clinton’s victory from popular social media platform Twitter. Lots of people expressing their admiration for the achievement, but plenty of dissenting voices too.
If you want to share you views on the debate via Twitter, we’re on @GuardianOpinion
Prez nominees 1789-2016 🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶🚶💃
A lot of little girls are in bed right now dreaming for the first time, without limits. You broke the mold @HillaryClinton 🇺🇸
Couldn't help thinking of my 12 year old daughter when I heard Hilary Clinton's speech. Today is an historic day.
Bull. Not under the plutocracy u represent. As a feminist, I should feel a thrill right now. I grieve that I don't. https://t.co/uz0y08mbbi
12.02pm BST
12:02
Sarah Marsh
Share your views via our anonymous form
10.36am BST
10:36
Welcome to the debate
Sarah Marsh
Last night Hillary Clinton claimed the Democratic nomination, embracing her role as the first woman in history to lead a major party’s bid for the White House.
The former secretary of state celebrated her victory in the nominating race over rival Bernie Sanders with supporters in New York. She described it as a “milestone” moment for women.
This comes despite the fact Sanders is still running, and the party’s nominee won’t be official until the delegate votes at the parties’ national conventions next month.
Clinton tweeted: “Tonight we can say with pride that, in America, there is no barrier too great and no ceiling too high to break.”
Tonight, we can say with pride that, in America, there is no barrier too great and no ceiling too high to break. pic.twitter.com/7vbGPJe543
Many women voters reacted to the news with emotion. “To paraphrase Neil Armstrong, this is one big step for women, and a bigger step for America,” said Barbara Lee, founder and president of the nonpartisan Barbara Lee Family Foundation which researches women’s races for executive office.
“A woman at the head of the table changes the conversation,” Lee continued. “A woman at the top of the ticket changes our perception of leadership – and the narrative about what girls can aspire to be.”
Certainly evidence would suggest that women in office inspire other women to run. Amelia Showalter, a political consultant specialising in data and analytics, studied the impact of electing women to statewide offices and found that the presence of a recruiting campaign could increase the share of women in the state legislature by about a percentage point. But what’s the impact beyond the political sphere?
Outside of the highest echelons of power, around the world women still face great challenges, including economic inequality, domestic violence, and other forms of violence against women.
What’s more, it’s been argued that Clinton does not represent values that help women, especially those from diverse racial and socioeconomic backgrounds. Speaking to The Guardian Anoa Changa said: “I’m sure for a certain class of women [Hillary Clinton] is perfect ... But there are a lot of issues that affect low-income women, immigrant women and women of color that her brand of doing things is not going to address.”
Changa said Sanders’ campaign for free tuition and a $15 minimum wage (among other things) tackles the roots of poverty, an issue that disproportionately affects women, better than Clinton’s platform.
Join us 12pm to 2pm to discuss the significance of this moment, as well as the challenges women still face today. Which industries are still rife with sexism? What can we do about the equal pay debate? How might Clinton be able to improve the situation?
Comments will be open at noon. Looking forward to kicking off at lunchtime, email ahead any comments to sarah.marsh@theguardian.com.
Updated
at 11.05am BST