This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/nov/27/general-election-leaders-try-to-steer-campaign-away-from-race-and-faith-live

The article has changed 29 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 12 Version 13
General election: Tories accuse Corbyn of 'lying to public' about what UK-US trade talks dossier reveals – live news General election: Tories accuse Corbyn of 'lying to public' about what UK-US trade talks dossier reveals – live news
(32 minutes later)
Labour leader says he has obtained 451 pages of unredacted documents that reveal the US is demanding NHS services are part of trade negotiationsLabour leader says he has obtained 451 pages of unredacted documents that reveal the US is demanding NHS services are part of trade negotiations
Boris Johnson is speaking now. He says it is great to be in Cornwall. He went for a run on the beach in St Ives this morning, he says.
He is now on to the standard stump speech – starting with why there must be an election, to get Brexit done etc etc.
Boris Johnson is doing a campaign event in Cornwall.
There will be a live feed at the top of the blog shortly.
These are from David Henig, a former UK civil servant specialising in trade policy who now runs the UK trade policy project for the European Centre for International Political Economy thinktank, on the leaked dossier about the UK-US trade talks.
These are from some journalists who have had a chance to look at the leaked documents about UK-US trade talks released by Labour this morning. Generally, they think they are not quite as incriminating as Jeremy Corbyn implied.
From Sky’s Ed Conway
From ITV’s Robert Peston
From the BBC’s Faisal Islam
From the Independent’s Benjamin Kentish
This is what Boris Johnson said in response to the Labour claims about the leaked documents from the UK-US trade deal talks. He said:This is what Boris Johnson said in response to the Labour claims about the leaked documents from the UK-US trade deal talks. He said:
Next up will be the Guardian’s defence and security editor, Dan Sabbagh. He will be answering any questions you may have about polling at 12.30pm on Friday.Next up will be the Guardian’s defence and security editor, Dan Sabbagh. He will be answering any questions you may have about polling at 12.30pm on Friday.
You can ask your question via our form here.You can ask your question via our form here.
Boris Johnson has apologised for the “hurt and offence” that has been caused by Islamophobia within the Conservative party ranks. Speaking on a campaign visit in Cornwall, Johnson said:Boris Johnson has apologised for the “hurt and offence” that has been caused by Islamophobia within the Conservative party ranks. Speaking on a campaign visit in Cornwall, Johnson said:
Asked whether he apologised for the Islamophobia that has taken place in the Tory party, he replied:Asked whether he apologised for the Islamophobia that has taken place in the Tory party, he replied:
Johnson’s decision to apologise may have been intended to mark a contrast with Jeremy Corbyn, who refused to for his handling of antisemitism in the Labour party in his Andrew Neil interview last night - even though he had apologised about it in the past. (See 7.43am.)Johnson’s decision to apologise may have been intended to mark a contrast with Jeremy Corbyn, who refused to for his handling of antisemitism in the Labour party in his Andrew Neil interview last night - even though he had apologised about it in the past. (See 7.43am.)
But there is also a contrast with the approach taken by Johnson himself in the BBC Question Time debate on Friday last week. Johnson was asked to apologise for a column he wrote last year describing Muslim women wearing burqas as looking like letterboxes. This was condemned as Islamophobic, and blamed for a 375% rise in incidents of Islamophobia, but Johnson refused to apologise.But there is also a contrast with the approach taken by Johnson himself in the BBC Question Time debate on Friday last week. Johnson was asked to apologise for a column he wrote last year describing Muslim women wearing burqas as looking like letterboxes. This was condemned as Islamophobic, and blamed for a 375% rise in incidents of Islamophobia, but Johnson refused to apologise.
Q: Just how radical is the Labour party manifesto – when compared to both traditional British politics, and to other European countries? Tom Bacon, freelance journalist in the entertainment sector, OrmskirkQ: Just how radical is the Labour party manifesto – when compared to both traditional British politics, and to other European countries? Tom Bacon, freelance journalist in the entertainment sector, Ormskirk
Hi Tom. So Jeremy Corbyn was right when he told my colleague Kate Proctor earlier this week that his plans wouldn’t put the UK significantly out of line with other European countries, in terms of tax and spending and the size of the state.Hi Tom. So Jeremy Corbyn was right when he told my colleague Kate Proctor earlier this week that his plans wouldn’t put the UK significantly out of line with other European countries, in terms of tax and spending and the size of the state.
But it’s the speed of the transformation that is so striking: the manifesto envisages a radical transformation of the economy and the role of government, in just five years. As director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies Paul Johnson put it, “this would be the biggest set of spending increases, and the biggest set of tax increases, and the biggest set of borrowing increases we’ve seen in peacetime history”.But it’s the speed of the transformation that is so striking: the manifesto envisages a radical transformation of the economy and the role of government, in just five years. As director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies Paul Johnson put it, “this would be the biggest set of spending increases, and the biggest set of tax increases, and the biggest set of borrowing increases we’ve seen in peacetime history”.
Q: What does the nationalisation of Openreach mean for the thousands of people currently working for Openreach’s competitors? There seems to have been no mention of this, with the implication being that given there will be no need for competitors of British Broadband, that their job losses will be the price to pay for ‘free’ broadband. Sam, West MidlandsQ: What does the nationalisation of Openreach mean for the thousands of people currently working for Openreach’s competitors? There seems to have been no mention of this, with the implication being that given there will be no need for competitors of British Broadband, that their job losses will be the price to pay for ‘free’ broadband. Sam, West Midlands
Good question, Sam. My colleague Peter Walker actually asked about the fate of those companies at the launch event for the broadband policy. The answer he was given was that they could continue to provide add-on services, such as subscription TV packages. But you’re right, the expectation would be that their broadband operations would wither away (while BT Openreach – renamed British Broadband – would expand its operations significantly, presumably).Good question, Sam. My colleague Peter Walker actually asked about the fate of those companies at the launch event for the broadband policy. The answer he was given was that they could continue to provide add-on services, such as subscription TV packages. But you’re right, the expectation would be that their broadband operations would wither away (while BT Openreach – renamed British Broadband – would expand its operations significantly, presumably).
Q: I’m aware that Labour are planning to decriminalise abortion – which I am wholly supportive of. However, I’m not clear on whether this also changes the law on the latest a woman can legally terminate? Many Tory supporters I know are posting pro-life website claims that abortion will be made legal at any point during pregnancy even when the baby is fully developed. I do not believe this to be true but struggling to find the details on the changes labour intend to make to abortion law and would like clarification. Nicole, HertfordshireQ: I’m aware that Labour are planning to decriminalise abortion – which I am wholly supportive of. However, I’m not clear on whether this also changes the law on the latest a woman can legally terminate? Many Tory supporters I know are posting pro-life website claims that abortion will be made legal at any point during pregnancy even when the baby is fully developed. I do not believe this to be true but struggling to find the details on the changes labour intend to make to abortion law and would like clarification. Nicole, Hertfordshire
Hi Nicole. I’m really interested (and concerned) to hear that that’s out there, because it’s not true. The only reference to abortion policy in the manifesto says: “We will uphold women’s reproductive rights and decriminalise abortions.” There is no reference to any plan to review the current policy. Thanks for asking that one.Hi Nicole. I’m really interested (and concerned) to hear that that’s out there, because it’s not true. The only reference to abortion policy in the manifesto says: “We will uphold women’s reproductive rights and decriminalise abortions.” There is no reference to any plan to review the current policy. Thanks for asking that one.
Just under 15 minutes left to ask any questions you may have on the Labour manifesto. Send them in to us here.Just under 15 minutes left to ask any questions you may have on the Labour manifesto. Send them in to us here.
Q: I have teenage grandchildren, one hoping to start higher education next year. Please can you clarify the Labour position on student grants – both for maintenance and tuition fees. Will there be means testing? If Labour takes over government after the election when would any new arrangements for student finances be introduced? Muriel, PrestonQ: I have teenage grandchildren, one hoping to start higher education next year. Please can you clarify the Labour position on student grants – both for maintenance and tuition fees. Will there be means testing? If Labour takes over government after the election when would any new arrangements for student finances be introduced? Muriel, Preston
Hello Muriel. Labour has said it will abolish tuition fees for all students – beginning immediately, so for those starting university in autumn 2020 – and bring back maintenance grants for the children of families on lower incomes.Hello Muriel. Labour has said it will abolish tuition fees for all students – beginning immediately, so for those starting university in autumn 2020 – and bring back maintenance grants for the children of families on lower incomes.
Q: Have Labour published any deeper details on what the £1bn public health investment might break down into? Health inequalities presumably need to be a focus. Joel, 30, working in the charity sector, EssexQ: Have Labour published any deeper details on what the £1bn public health investment might break down into? Health inequalities presumably need to be a focus. Joel, 30, working in the charity sector, Essex
Hi Joel. So yes: the manifesto says a Labour government would make reducing health inequalities a clear target of public policy.Hi Joel. So yes: the manifesto says a Labour government would make reducing health inequalities a clear target of public policy.
The £1bn planned increase in public health funding is part of that, and they say they would recruit 4,500 more health visitors and school nurses – and take a series of other steps on everything from increasing breastfeeding support for new mums, to widening the scope of the sugar tax to tackle obesity.The £1bn planned increase in public health funding is part of that, and they say they would recruit 4,500 more health visitors and school nurses – and take a series of other steps on everything from increasing breastfeeding support for new mums, to widening the scope of the sugar tax to tackle obesity.
To try and make the target stick, they also say they would introduce a new Future Generations Wellbeing Act: a law aimed at forcing the government to check the impact of all new policy on health inequality; and a new obligation on NHS agencies to cooperate with directors of public health.To try and make the target stick, they also say they would introduce a new Future Generations Wellbeing Act: a law aimed at forcing the government to check the impact of all new policy on health inequality; and a new obligation on NHS agencies to cooperate with directors of public health.
Nicola Sturgeon has said the Scottish National party would have “no great objection” if Jeremy Corbyn was replaced as Labour leader, and hinted strongly she would support that if it helped form an anti-Tory coalition at Westminster.Nicola Sturgeon has said the Scottish National party would have “no great objection” if Jeremy Corbyn was replaced as Labour leader, and hinted strongly she would support that if it helped form an anti-Tory coalition at Westminster.
The SNP leader said she “didn’t get to choose who leads the Labour party” but repeated several times at the launch of her party’s election manifesto she was no fan of Corbyn’s.The SNP leader said she “didn’t get to choose who leads the Labour party” but repeated several times at the launch of her party’s election manifesto she was no fan of Corbyn’s.
Asked whether the SNP would support replacing Corbyn as party leader if there were moves to do so at Westminster, to build a cross-party coalition with Labour, she said:Asked whether the SNP would support replacing Corbyn as party leader if there were moves to do so at Westminster, to build a cross-party coalition with Labour, she said:
The Labour adviser Lord Kerslake suggested earlier this week that Corbyn’s resignation as leader and a deal on staging a second independence referendum could be the price exacted by the Lib Dems and SNP for forming a post-election coalition.The Labour adviser Lord Kerslake suggested earlier this week that Corbyn’s resignation as leader and a deal on staging a second independence referendum could be the price exacted by the Lib Dems and SNP for forming a post-election coalition.
Opinion polling suggests Labour is well short of winning enough seats to form a majority government, increasing speculation that Corbyn will have to strike deals with other opposition parties to block Boris Johnson from forming the next government.Opinion polling suggests Labour is well short of winning enough seats to form a majority government, increasing speculation that Corbyn will have to strike deals with other opposition parties to block Boris Johnson from forming the next government.
Even so, Corbyn has repeatedly ruled out any pacts or deals, rejecting Sturgeon’s demands that he empower Holyrood to stage a fresh independence vote in late 2020. Jo Swinson, the Lib Dem leader, has repeatedly stated her party would never do deals with a Corbyn-led government.Even so, Corbyn has repeatedly ruled out any pacts or deals, rejecting Sturgeon’s demands that he empower Holyrood to stage a fresh independence vote in late 2020. Jo Swinson, the Lib Dem leader, has repeatedly stated her party would never do deals with a Corbyn-led government.
At the SNP manifesto launch this morning, Sturgeon was asked by Channel 4 News about the attacks on Corbyn’s suitability as prime minister by Ephraim Mirvis, the chief rabbi, and whether that gave her pause for thought about propping up a minority Labour government. She replied:At the SNP manifesto launch this morning, Sturgeon was asked by Channel 4 News about the attacks on Corbyn’s suitability as prime minister by Ephraim Mirvis, the chief rabbi, and whether that gave her pause for thought about propping up a minority Labour government. She replied:
But she said the SNP would exercise its duties at Westminster responsibly, pressing for its policy goals to be adopted by the next UK government. “We will not be signing any blank cheque to Jeremy Corbyn or to any leader of the Labour party.”But she said the SNP would exercise its duties at Westminster responsibly, pressing for its policy goals to be adopted by the next UK government. “We will not be signing any blank cheque to Jeremy Corbyn or to any leader of the Labour party.”
Some of you have been sending in your questions about the Labour manifesto which I will be answering until 1.30pm. You can share your questions with us via our form here.Some of you have been sending in your questions about the Labour manifesto which I will be answering until 1.30pm. You can share your questions with us via our form here.
Q: Labour has often hinted at electoral reform. Is there any commitment to scrapping the first past the post system for general elections? Daniel, 46, geologist, Leamington SpaQ: Labour has often hinted at electoral reform. Is there any commitment to scrapping the first past the post system for general elections? Daniel, 46, geologist, Leamington Spa
I’m afraid, not, Daniel. Labour’s manifesto says it will “take urgent steps to refresh our democracy”, and commits to a series of specific changes, including abolishing the hereditary principle in the House of Lords and lowering the voting age to 16; but there is no mention of voting reform.I’m afraid, not, Daniel. Labour’s manifesto says it will “take urgent steps to refresh our democracy”, and commits to a series of specific changes, including abolishing the hereditary principle in the House of Lords and lowering the voting age to 16; but there is no mention of voting reform.
It does say the reboot of democracy will be guided by a UK-wide constitutional convention, led by a citizens’ assembly. Its appears to be mainly focused on the balance of power between Westminster and the rest of the UK; but perhaps voting reform might emerge as a recommendation? That’s as close as the manifesto comes to the issue.It does say the reboot of democracy will be guided by a UK-wide constitutional convention, led by a citizens’ assembly. Its appears to be mainly focused on the balance of power between Westminster and the rest of the UK; but perhaps voting reform might emerge as a recommendation? That’s as close as the manifesto comes to the issue.
Q: Has Labour made any indication that they would have a gender balanced cabinet? Eric Ekong, 28, software engineer, LondonQ: Has Labour made any indication that they would have a gender balanced cabinet? Eric Ekong, 28, software engineer, London
So I haven’t seen Jeremy Corbyn make that commitment explicitly, Eric, but he has repeatedly highlighted the gender balance in his shadow cabinet, and contrasted that with the Conservatives’ more male-dominated top team. So while he hasn’t committed to keeping everyone in the same jobs if he got into Downing Street, I think it’s highly likely he would maintain a balance.So I haven’t seen Jeremy Corbyn make that commitment explicitly, Eric, but he has repeatedly highlighted the gender balance in his shadow cabinet, and contrasted that with the Conservatives’ more male-dominated top team. So while he hasn’t committed to keeping everyone in the same jobs if he got into Downing Street, I think it’s highly likely he would maintain a balance.
Here are the main points from the Conservative rebuttal released in response to the leaked UK-US trade talks dossier, and what Jeremy Corbyn was saying about it. (See 12.20pm.)Here are the main points from the Conservative rebuttal released in response to the leaked UK-US trade talks dossier, and what Jeremy Corbyn was saying about it. (See 12.20pm.)
The Tories claim Corbyn deliberately misrepresented what the documents say about the UK being willing to consider lengthening the time during which medicine patents apply. Corbyn argued that this meant drug prices could rise for the UK under a UK-US trade deal. (See 11.37am.) But the Tories accuse Corbyn of lying. They say:The Tories claim Corbyn deliberately misrepresented what the documents say about the UK being willing to consider lengthening the time during which medicine patents apply. Corbyn argued that this meant drug prices could rise for the UK under a UK-US trade deal. (See 11.37am.) But the Tories accuse Corbyn of lying. They say:
The Tories say the documents show the Americans accept that the UK does not want to include the NHS in a deal. They say (bold in original):The Tories say the documents show the Americans accept that the UK does not want to include the NHS in a deal. They say (bold in original):
The Tories say the documents show that, although the US “probed” the UK position, the British stressed that they did not want to include the health service in a deal. They say (bold in original):The Tories say the documents show that, although the US “probed” the UK position, the British stressed that they did not want to include the health service in a deal. They say (bold in original):
The Tories say the government has not accepted a negative listing approach to services in a trade deal (ie, the assumption that services are included unless the deal says specifically that they are not). Corbyn implied the opposite at the news conference this morning.The Tories say the government has not accepted a negative listing approach to services in a trade deal (ie, the assumption that services are included unless the deal says specifically that they are not). Corbyn implied the opposite at the news conference this morning.
The Tories says Corbyn was wrong to say trade negotiations have reached an advance stage with the US because formally they have not started. The UK cannot negotiate trade deals while it remains a member of the EU.The Tories says Corbyn was wrong to say trade negotiations have reached an advance stage with the US because formally they have not started. The UK cannot negotiate trade deals while it remains a member of the EU.
They say the documents have been online for two months. (My colleague Alex Hern has more on this at 12.28pm.)They say the documents have been online for two months. (My colleague Alex Hern has more on this at 12.28pm.)
The Tories say that, under Labour’s plan for a customs union with the EU, the UK could be bound by an EU-US trade deal over which it would have no say.The Tories say that, under Labour’s plan for a customs union with the EU, the UK could be bound by an EU-US trade deal over which it would have no say.
Many of your questions so far have been about how Labour will pay for free education and how EU citizens will be affected by Brexit.Many of your questions so far have been about how Labour will pay for free education and how EU citizens will be affected by Brexit.
Q: One of the most popular ideas in the Labour manifesto is free education for all. Where would the money to back up the abolition of tuition fees for undergraduate and postgraduate courses come from? And how would that affect the economy given the astronomical fees that students currently pay/get a loan from? Carina Nicu, 27 years old, research technician at the University of Manchester, ManchesterQ: One of the most popular ideas in the Labour manifesto is free education for all. Where would the money to back up the abolition of tuition fees for undergraduate and postgraduate courses come from? And how would that affect the economy given the astronomical fees that students currently pay/get a loan from? Carina Nicu, 27 years old, research technician at the University of Manchester, Manchester
Hi Carina, you’re right that abolishing tuition fees and restoring maintenance grants is the single most costly measure in the manifesto, at £13.6bn a year by the end of the parliament.Hi Carina, you’re right that abolishing tuition fees and restoring maintenance grants is the single most costly measure in the manifesto, at £13.6bn a year by the end of the parliament.
Labour says almost half of that, £6.4bn, will be offset by the savings from getting rid of the current system (it’s costly to administer, and many students have their fees written off anyway). They would also argue that ensuring kids from lower-income households are not deterred from going to university would have wider social/economic benefits – though of course it wouldn’t just be these students who would benefit.Labour says almost half of that, £6.4bn, will be offset by the savings from getting rid of the current system (it’s costly to administer, and many students have their fees written off anyway). They would also argue that ensuring kids from lower-income households are not deterred from going to university would have wider social/economic benefits – though of course it wouldn’t just be these students who would benefit.
Labour haven’t earmarked specific taxes to pay for each spending measure – but their biggest money-raiser is increasing corporation tax, which is expected to bring in a whopping £23.7bn a year within five years. The impact of that on the wider economy is contested: Labour say they’re just taking it back to 2010 levels, and the 26% rate still won’t be high by international standards.Labour haven’t earmarked specific taxes to pay for each spending measure – but their biggest money-raiser is increasing corporation tax, which is expected to bring in a whopping £23.7bn a year within five years. The impact of that on the wider economy is contested: Labour say they’re just taking it back to 2010 levels, and the 26% rate still won’t be high by international standards.
Critics say it will deter foreign investment – and that part of the cost will ultimately be passed on to customers and workers, as well as wealthy executives and shareholders.Critics say it will deter foreign investment – and that part of the cost will ultimately be passed on to customers and workers, as well as wealthy executives and shareholders.
Q: Are there any concrete measures for EU nationals living in the UK (in the context of Brexit) in the Labour manifesto? SabrinaQ: Are there any concrete measures for EU nationals living in the UK (in the context of Brexit) in the Labour manifesto? Sabrina
Hi Sabrina. Yes: the Labour manifesto reiterates the party’s longstanding commitment to uphold the rights of EU citizens already in the UK to remain here.Hi Sabrina. Yes: the Labour manifesto reiterates the party’s longstanding commitment to uphold the rights of EU citizens already in the UK to remain here.
And it goes a bit further, saying a Labour government would get rid of the legal requirement to register under the EU settlement scheme. It would instead become a “declaratory system”, under which EU citizens could register if they wished, but it wouldn’t be a requirement for continuing to live and work here, the manifesto says. (It doesn’t say how that would work for employers wondering if a particular individual has the right to be here). Labour would also expand the right of all migrants to bring their families to the UK.And it goes a bit further, saying a Labour government would get rid of the legal requirement to register under the EU settlement scheme. It would instead become a “declaratory system”, under which EU citizens could register if they wished, but it wouldn’t be a requirement for continuing to live and work here, the manifesto says. (It doesn’t say how that would work for employers wondering if a particular individual has the right to be here). Labour would also expand the right of all migrants to bring their families to the UK.
As for freedom of movement, that would depend on what happens with Brexit.As for freedom of movement, that would depend on what happens with Brexit.
I’m Heather Stewart, political editor of the Guardian, and will be answering your questions about the Labour manifesto today. I covered economics at the Guardian and Observer for 15 years before transferring to Westminster in 2016 – initially in a job share with Anushka Asthana. Since then I have covered a referendum and now two general elections.I’m Heather Stewart, political editor of the Guardian, and will be answering your questions about the Labour manifesto today. I covered economics at the Guardian and Observer for 15 years before transferring to Westminster in 2016 – initially in a job share with Anushka Asthana. Since then I have covered a referendum and now two general elections.
If you have a question you can send it to us by filling in the form here.If you have a question you can send it to us by filling in the form here.
The 451-page cache of US/UK trade negotiations shared by Jeremy Corbyn was published before today – by an unknown whistleblower to the social news website Reddit.In a post titled “OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE: Great Britain is practically standing on her knees working on a trade agreement with the US”, the whistleblower shared a link to the documents, which they said “sometimes give the impression that the second side of the process is not Great Britain, but a third world country”.But despite the poster’s belief that “this publication will make some noise”, the post attracted just a hundred or so “upvotes”, and 23 comments, in the month since it was made. The cache did slowly begin to be shared more widely, however, with Labour MEP Jude Kirton-Darling posting it on her Twitter account five days ago.Shortly before they posted the documents to Reddit, the original leaker, a user called gregoratior, set up a new subforum on the site: “ukwhistleblower”. But the subforum has not yet had anything posted in it, and had just five members before the news broke today.The 451-page cache of US/UK trade negotiations shared by Jeremy Corbyn was published before today – by an unknown whistleblower to the social news website Reddit.In a post titled “OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE: Great Britain is practically standing on her knees working on a trade agreement with the US”, the whistleblower shared a link to the documents, which they said “sometimes give the impression that the second side of the process is not Great Britain, but a third world country”.But despite the poster’s belief that “this publication will make some noise”, the post attracted just a hundred or so “upvotes”, and 23 comments, in the month since it was made. The cache did slowly begin to be shared more widely, however, with Labour MEP Jude Kirton-Darling posting it on her Twitter account five days ago.Shortly before they posted the documents to Reddit, the original leaker, a user called gregoratior, set up a new subforum on the site: “ukwhistleblower”. But the subforum has not yet had anything posted in it, and had just five members before the news broke today.
The Conservatives have released a four-page statement rebutting what was said by Jeremy Corbyn at his news conference this morning about the documents he has obtained about the UK-US trade talks.The Conservatives have released a four-page statement rebutting what was said by Jeremy Corbyn at his news conference this morning about the documents he has obtained about the UK-US trade talks.
I will post full details of what the Tory rebuttal says shortly, but the gist of it is that Corbyn has deliberately misrepresented what they say.I will post full details of what the Tory rebuttal says shortly, but the gist of it is that Corbyn has deliberately misrepresented what they say.
In a statement Liz Truss, the international trade secretary, has also sought to link Corbyn’s handling of this story to his approach to antisemitism. She said:In a statement Liz Truss, the international trade secretary, has also sought to link Corbyn’s handling of this story to his approach to antisemitism. She said:
Truss was referring to this article when she talked about Corbyn using the phrase “Zionist lobby”.Truss was referring to this article when she talked about Corbyn using the phrase “Zionist lobby”.
The Guido Fawkes website has published what it says are full versions of the documents released by Labour today.The Guido Fawkes website has published what it says are full versions of the documents released by Labour today.