This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2016/jul/07/malcolm-turnbull-to-meet-bob-katter-as-coalition-inches-towards-government-politics-live
The article has changed 16 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 7 | Version 8 |
---|---|
John Howard on Iraq: there was no lie, there were errors of intelligence – politics live | |
(35 minutes later) | |
4.13am BST | |
04:13 | |
John Howard does not share the view that Islamic state grew out of the Iraq invasion. | |
I don’t share the view that the terrible conflict in the Middle East is the direct consequence of the operation in March of 2003. I don’t share that view. | |
4.12am BST | |
04:12 | |
John Howard: there was no lie, there were errors of intelligence | |
Howard: | |
In the years that have gone by there’s been this constant claim that we went to war based on a lie. There was no lie. There were errors in intelligence but there was no lie and can I also make the observation that the Chillcot Report imposes a standard of beyond doubt. Can I offer the view that when you’re dealing with intelligence it’s very, very hard to find a situation where advice is beyond doubt. Sometimes if you wait for advice that is beyond doubt you can end up with very disastrous consequences. | |
4.09am BST | |
04:09 | |
John Howard says while it was subsequently found not to be the case, the advice was there were weapons of mass destruction. | |
It was the judgment not only of the joint intelligence committee in the United Kingdom, and that was informed principally but not only by MI6 but also the national intelligence assessment of October or November of 2002 in the United States which is a distillation of the views of all of the American intelligence agencies including the CIA was that Iraq did possess weapons of mass destruction. | |
Updated | Updated |
at 4.13am BST | |
4.08am BST | |
04:08 | |
Context is everything, says John Howard who disagrees with Chilcot | |
His views are naturally informed by subsequent events. We are all informed by subsequent events but as somebody who’s been in a decision-making position in relation to these matters, I make the obvious point that you make judgements based on the information available at the time. Context is everything, as a wise man once said, and it’s very important to keep that in mind. | |
His view seems similar to Tony Blair. | |
4.04am BST | |
04:04 | |
John Howard is speaking about the Chilcot report. He makes the caveat that he has not read the very large report entirely. | |
He does not think another enquiry is necessary. | |
3.57am BST | |
03:57 | |
Bob Katter: prayers to the good lord | |
Here is a little bit of Bob Katter from a release today: | |
The financial oppression of the elderly, the struggling abandoned young families will be addressed | |
It looks like we’ll be in a very powerful position. | |
We will be saying our prayers to the good Lord and we hope we can get enlightenment through to the people to have to date exercised power in Canberra. | |
3.54am BST | |
03:54 | |
Bob Katter and John Howard are both coming up in separate press conferences shortly. | |
3.51am BST | |
03:51 | |
Just a quick take from chief economist of AMP Capital, Shane Oliver, before doubling back to Bowen and Morrison. | |
Being put on negative credit watch by a ratings agency is not surprising. Australia has now seen years of slippage in returning the budget to surplus and the messy election outcome threatens more slippage whichever way it goes. | |
In short, a downgrade is not disastrous but it would be a bad sign for Australia. | |
Of course being put on negative watch is not the same as a downgrade and a country can remain on a negative outlook for up to two years without being formally downgraded. | |
But I suspect it’s probable that a formal downgrade will follow unless the new government is able to hold the line on the budget deficit projections which will be hard given the likely state of the Senate. | |
The $A fell slightly on the news from around $US0.753 to around $0.747 but has since recovered to around $US0.75. Bond yields were little changed. | |
Updated | Updated |
at 3.53am BST | |
3.48am BST | |
03:48 | |
Chris Bowen is asked, given the cost of Medicare’s growth into the future due to demographics (ageing population), do you need further revenue measures to pay for it? | |
And we have. We led the debate on negative gearing, capital gains tax reform, high income super, we were talking about this 18 months ago, announcing detailed policies. The now treasurer railed against it, tobacco (tax), and we have led that. If you’re asking will we support an increase in the GST, the answer is no. | |
Updated | Updated |
at 3.49am BST | |
3.45am BST | |
03:45 | |
Bowen is asked whether Labor will support more of the government’s savings measures. He says we have supported some, not others. Yet the Coalition is still relying on savings which will not pass the parliament. | |
Scott Morrison’s budget is based on those measures passing as well as highly heroic assumptions on things like the iron ore price. They will not pass and it is about time he was honest about it to the parliament and to the people. | |
3.43am BST | |
03:43 | |
Bowen is asked, given the statement, is now the time for a banking royal commission? | |
I think those two issues are completely unrelated, with respect. The ratings agencies have expressed no concerns about a royal commission into the banks. | |
3.42am BST | |
03:42 | |
Chris Bowen: | |
The Liberal and National parties said there was a budget emergency and that they that they would be the party to fix it and of course what we’ve seen is three years of policy missteps, false starts and missed opportunities, particularly since Malcolm Turnbull and Scott Morrison took the reins we’ve seen a lack of strategy and a lack of coherence in their economic approach. |